Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hsil Limited vs.altra Ceramic and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 841/2016 & IAs No.8281/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 4433/2017 (u/O VIII R-1 CPC), 14401/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) & 14402/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus ALTRA CERAMIC AND ORS Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ..... Defendants + CS(COMM) 842/2016 & IAs No.8302/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 14399/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) & 14400/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) AND + HSIL LTD Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus MARUTI CERAMIC AND ORS Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ..... Defendants AND CS(COMM) 844/2016 & IAs No.8315/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 14403/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) & 14404/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus ..... Defendants SAFFRON CERA ...
Sh. Dhanpal vs.land and Building Department and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision- 05.04.2018. + W.P.(C) 127/2013 SH. DHANPAL Through Mr.N.S.Dalal with Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advs. ........ Petitioner Versus LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rachana Srivastva with Ms.Monika Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the... Petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 30.10.2012 as also the Minutes of the Recommendation Committee dated 12.10.2012, whereby the... Petitioners case for grant of an alternative plot has been rejected on the ground that the... Petitioner was neither the recorded owner nor had received the compensation amount and was, therefore, not eligible as per the Rehabilitation Policy for allotment of an alternative plot.2. Mr.N.S.Dalal, learned counsel for the... Petitioner submits that the... Petitioners father late Shri Shiv Lal, was co-owner with certain other persons in land forming part of Khas...
Shiv Shakti Metal Works vs.m/s Thukral Steel Corp.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY28 2018 DECIDED ON : APRIL05 2018 CRL.REV.P. 841/2017 & Crl.M.B.1988/2017 SHIV SHAKTI METAL WORKS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Roshan Santhalia with Mr.Ankit Miglani, Advocates. versus M/S THUKRAL STEEL CORP. Through : Mr.Sanjay Abbot with Mr.Ankit Agarwal, Advocates. ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 842/2017 & Crl.M.B.1989/2017 M/S R K INDUTRIES Through : Mr.Roshan Santhalia with Mr.Ankit Miglani, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus M/S THUKRAL STEEL CORP Through : Mr.Sanjay Abbot with Mr.Ankit Agarwal, Advocates. ..... Respondent + + Crl.Rev.P.841/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 6 + CRL.REV.P. 846/2017 & Crl.M.B.1955/2017 SHIV SHAKTI METAL WORKS Through : Mr.Roshan Santhalia with Mr.Ankit Miglani, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus M/S THUKRAL STEEL CORP. Through : Mr.Sanjay Abbot with Mr.Ankit Agarwal, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P GARG, J.1. Revision petitions No.841/2017...
Madan Lal & Anr vs.state Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL05 2018 Versus 154........ Petitioners A & ORS Through : Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(CRL) 1627/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.11201/15, 154& + W.P.(CRL) 1626/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.111& 154........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Shashank Vaccher, counsel for STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Shashank Vaccher, counsel for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC. SI Bharti, PS Shalimar Bagh. MADAN LAL & ANR Through : Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus Mr.Avi Singh, ASC. SI Bharti, PS Shalimar Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. W.P.(Crl.) No.1627/2015 has been preferred by the prosecutrix A (assumed name). FIR No.8under Sections W.P.(Crl.)1627/2015 & connected matter Page 1 of 4 342/323/328/376/5IPC was registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh on her complaint on 19.07.2015. She had alleged commission of rape by her father. Grievance of the petitioners is that...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.suman & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ 27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"5th April, 2018 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD + MAC.APP. 685/2016 & CM No.10684/2018 SUMAN & ORS versus Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Bahal with Mr. Shailendra Verma, Advocates for R-1 & 3 along with R-1 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (MACT Old No.2 new No.15291/15) instituted for and on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 4 (collectively, the claimants) on 13.09.2010, by judgment dated 27.05.2016, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal returned finding to the effect that Vicky Chauhan, aged about 22 years had died in motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 22.06.2010 due to negligent driving by fifth respondent (driver) of motorcycle bearing registration DL-5-SAA-6639 registered in the name of sixth respondent (owner), and admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in q...
Sumer Singh & Anr. Vs.sunder Lal Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~15 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"5th April, 2018 RC Rev. 107/2016 SUMER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Deepak & versus Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. SUNDER LAL GUPTA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nishtha Garg, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondents concededly are the owners of property described as bearing no.489, Teliwara, Shahdara, Delhi 110031, of which one shop at ground floor (the subject premises) forms a part. The petitioners were concededly inducted as tenants in the said premises wherein they would run business in the name and style of Binni Garments. The respondents had instituted eviction case (E- 105/14) on 01.10.2014 against the petitioners under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 primarily on the ground that they required the subject premises for purposes of accommodating the need of Ms. Bharti Gupta, daughter of the second petitioner, who intended to s...
The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.aditya Pandey and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2018 CS(OS) No.1185/2006 & IA No.11203/2016 (of the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC). THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Himanshu Bagai, Adv. versus ADITYA PANDEY AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Malhotra and Mr. Angad S. Dugal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. instituted this suit, as per amended plaint dated 3rd April, 2009, for permanent injunction restraining the defendants Synergy Media Entertainment Ltd. and its Senior Manager (Finance) Aditya Pandey, both located at Bhopal and Jaipur, from broadcasting / performing or communicating to the public literary and / or musical works of the plaintiff Society or those of the foreign sister societies of the plaintiff Society and for recovery of damages.2. The suit came up first before this Court on ...
Raj Kishore vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1337/2013 4 + 5 + MANISH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CRL.A. 1369/2013 DAL CHAND Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra and Mr. Syed Meesam, Advocates ..... Appellant versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CRL.A. 716/2014 RAJ KISHORE STATE Through: Ms. ..... Appellant Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Crl.A. Nos. 1337/2013, 1369/2013 & 716/2014 Page 1 of 18 % JUDGMENT0504.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 8th July, 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West-II, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.63/2013 arising out of FIR No.179/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Adar...
United India Airways Ltd. & Anr. Vs.chief Enforcement Officer , Enforc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2018 CRL.REV.P. 642/2017 UNITED INDIA AIRWAYS LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus CHIEF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER , ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Shreya Sinha, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 642/2017 & Crl.M.A.14087/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioners impugns Order-on-Charge dated 11.07.2017 framing charge against the petitioners for alleged violation of Section 9(1)(e) of Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as FERA).2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that the respondent has failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of CRL.REV.P. 642/2017 Page 1 of 7 proviso to Clause (ii) of sub Section (2) of Section 61 of FERA and no opportunity notice, as mandated...
K N Aithal vs.canara Bank and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + K N AITHAL Date of Decision: April 05, 2018 W.P.(C) 10116/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohammad Sajid, Advocate versus CANARA BANK AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jasbir Bidhuri and Ms.Niyati Patwardhan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Quashing of Regulation 38 of Canara Bank (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 is sought by petitioner on the ground that it contravenes Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. A mandamus is sought by petitioner to respondents to release leave encashment benefit to petitioner. It is matter of record that petitioner was departmentally proceeded against and consequent upon a departmental inquiry, penalty of dismissal from service was inflicted upon petitioner in the year 2009 and there is no challenge to the penalty inflicted upon petitioner. What is sought in this petitioner is the encashment of leave of 240 days.2.... Petitioners counsel relie...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »