Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abdul Rehman & Anr. Vs.mohd. Ashqeen & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM (M) 656/2016 ABDUL REHMAN & ANR. Decided on :-"5th April, 2018 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Ruhini Dey & Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Advs. versus MOHD. ASHQEEN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Vashishta, Mr. S.P. Yadav & Mr. Mahesh Saroj, Advs. for R-1 to 4 with R-1 and 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petitioners had instituted a case (E-241/2014) for eviction under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against the sixth respondent on 21.10.2014 in respect of property described as 2561, Baradari Sher Afgan, Ballimaran, Delhi -110006 as specifically shown in the site plan (page 41 of the paper book) attached to the said petition. The eviction case resulted in judgment dated 30.03.2015 being passed by the Additional Rent Controller taking note of the fact that the sixth respondent had failed to come with the application for leave to contest within the statutor...
Rajbir Singh & Anr vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY02 2018 DECIDED ON : APRIL05 2018 + FAO272015 RAJBIR SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Anshuman, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of Railway Accident Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, impugning the judgment of the Railways Claims Tribunal dated 23.05.2014 whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants was dismissed. The appeal is contested by the respondent.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the deceased Mohan, appellants son, while travelling by train No.19023 Janta Express from Shakurbasti to Rohtak on 18.09.2012 accidently fell down from the running train near the housing board colony and suffered injuries. Subsequently, he succumbed to the injuries on FAO No.27/2015 Page 1 of 6 27.09.2012. It is claimed that the deceased was a bonafide passenger and had a valid MST. The cl...
‘A’ & Ors vs.state Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL05 2018 Versus 154........ Petitioners A & ORS Through : Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(CRL) 1627/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.11201/15, 154& + W.P.(CRL) 1626/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.111& 154........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Shashank Vaccher, counsel for STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Shashank Vaccher, counsel for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC. SI Bharti, PS Shalimar Bagh. MADAN LAL & ANR Through : Mr.Sunil Dalal, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus Mr.Avi Singh, ASC. SI Bharti, PS Shalimar Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. W.P.(Crl.) No.1627/2015 has been preferred by the prosecutrix A (assumed name). FIR No.8under Sections W.P.(Crl.)1627/2015 & connected matter Page 1 of 4 342/323/328/376/5IPC was registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh on her complaint on 19.07.2015. She had alleged commission of rape by her father. Grievance of the petitioners is that...
Ananya Kakkar vs.reena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~19 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"5th April, 2018 RC.REV. 295/2016 and CM APPL.20160/2016 (stay) ANANYA KAKKAR ........ Petitioner REENA Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Wills Mathews, Advocate with Mr. Ginesh P., Adv. with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The relationship of tenant and landlord between the petitioner on one hand and the respondent on the other is admitted. The tenancy portion is described as one room with kitchen, besides latrine and bathroom on the top floor of property No.40-A, Old DDA Janta Flats, Chilla Village, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi-110091. The respondent- landlady had moved a petition (E. No.73/2013) for an order of eviction against the petitioner-tenant on the ground under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The petitioner in response to the special summons under Section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act, 195...
Shital Prashad Kalra vs.naresh Bahadur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :05. 04.2018 RFA5142015 & REVIEW APPL. 355/2017 SHITAL PRASHAD KALRA ..... Appellant Through: Dr.Ashwani Bharadwaj, Advocate. versus NARESH BAHADUR & ORS. Through: None. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) REVIEW APPL. 355/2017 1. The petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 23.05.2017 passed in RFA5142015.2. The facts giving rise to filing of this Review Application are that in the month of May, 2010, the petitioner had deposited Rs.2,21,000/- in the bank account of proprietary firm of respondent No.1, Rs.1,49,000/- in bank account of respondent No.1 and Rs.1,50,000/- in the bank account of respondent No.3. These deposits were allegedly made by the petitioner on an assurance of respondents No.1 and 2 that the amount so deposited shall carry interest @24% per annum. The learned Additional District Judge-II, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (in short learned ADJ), by its j...
Jaideep Mohan vs.hub International Industries & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2018. CS(COMM) No.758/2016 JAIDEEP MOHAN .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. R.K. Jain & Mr. Devanshu Jain, Advs. Versus HUB INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES & ANR. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Sushant Singh with Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent injunction restraining the two defendants namely Hub International Industries and NV Distilleries & Breweries Pvt. Ltd. from manufacturing, bottling, selling, offering for sale or otherwise dealing in alcoholic beverages including premium whiskey blended with scotch, gin, rum, vodka, wine and brandy under the trade mark GOLDSMITH averring the same to be similar/deceptively similar to the plaintiffs registered trade mark BLACKSMITH and for ancillary reliefs of recovery of damages, destruction, etc.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 10th June, 2016 when though summons of the suit were ord...
Manish Chand vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1337/2013 4 + 5 + MANISH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CRL.A. 1369/2013 DAL CHAND Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra and Mr. Syed Meesam, Advocates ..... Appellant versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CRL.A. 716/2014 RAJ KISHORE STATE Through: Ms. ..... Appellant Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Crl.A. Nos. 1337/2013, 1369/2013 & 716/2014 Page 1 of 18 % JUDGMENT0504.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 8th July, 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West-II, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.63/2013 arising out of FIR No.179/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Adar...
Shiv Shakti Metal Works vs.m/s Thukral Steel Corp
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY28 2018 DECIDED ON : APRIL05 2018 CRL.REV.P. 846/2017 & Crl.M.B.1955/2017 SHIV SHAKTI METAL WORKS Through : Mr.Roshan Santhalia with Mr.Ankit Miglani, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus M/S THUKRAL STEEL CORP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Sanjay Abbot with Mr.Ankit Agarwal, Advocates ..... Respondent + S.P.GARG, J.The present revision petition is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.Rev.P.841/2017 titled Shiv Shakti Metal Works vs. M/S Thukral Steel Corp. APRIL05 2018/sa (S.P.GARG) JUDGE...
Benara Bearing & Pistons Ltd vs.mahle Engine Components India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. A. (COMM.) 11/2017 Reserved on:18. h January, 2018 Date of decision:5. h April, 2018 BENARA BEARING & PISTONS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. With Mr.Jayant K Mehtra, Mr.Ayush Agrawal, Mr.Himanshu Gupta & Mr.Tushar Bhardwaj, Advs. versus MAHLE ENGINE COMPONENTS INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sudhir Sharma, Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Mr.Akhil Anand, Mr.Abhishek Swaroop, Mr.Anirudh Krishan Gandhi & Ms.Abhilasha Vig, Mr.Mahboob Singh Sandhu, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the order dated 12.01.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator holding that there is no concluded Arbitration Agreement between the parties. ARB. A. (COMM.) 11/2017 Page 1 2. The main contention of the learned senior counsel for the appel...
A.k.raina vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~R-8 (Sr.Citizens) * + W.P.(C) 11020/2015 A.K.RAINA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr.Padma Kumar S., Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Mr.Ruchir Mishra & Mr.Mukesh Kr.Tiwari, Advocates for UOI ..... Respondent ORDER0504.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-adjudication of the pleas % 1. taken by him in O.A. No.2682/2012, that has been decided by the Tribunal vide common judgment dated 25.08.2015 in O.A. Nos.382/2006 & 2682/2012.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner clarifies that the petitioner was a co-applicant before the Tribunal in O.A. No.382/2006 and the sole applicant in O.A. No.2682/2012. He states that in O.A. No.2682/2012, the prayer made was for quashing and setting aside the order dated 18.03.2011, passed by the respondent, reducing the pay scale of the petitioner and others, working on the post of W.P.(C) 11020/2015 Page 1 of 4 Accounts Officer in R&AW...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »