Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vimmi Puri vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~8 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017 VIMMI PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1738/2017 SUNIL CHOPRA Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1740/2017 SAHIL PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1742/2017 SANJEEV PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang & Ms. Shivani Kant For the Respondent : Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State SI Ajay Kumar, PS Kirti Nagar BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017, 1738/2017, 1740/2017, 1742/2017 Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0604.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.133/2016 under Sections 420/4IPC, Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. Learned Senior...
Jewels India Hotels Private Limited and Anr. Vs.surender Bajaj and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h April, 2018 RFA762017 & CM APPL. 2452/2017 (Stay) JEWELS INDIA HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Mr. Sahil Agarwal & Ms. Barkha Khattal, Advocate (M-9810117465). versus SURENDER BAJAJ AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advocates for R-1 to 2 (M- 9810049061). Mr. Arjun Mitra, Standing Counsel Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Asst. Standing Counsel along with Ms. Jaskaran & Mr. Madhusudhan, Inspectro NDMC. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 2453/2017 (Delay for 201 days) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. Application is disposed of. RFA762017 2. This is an appeal arising out of a suit where the... RESPONDENTS/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Plaintiffs) seeking the following reliefs: (a) Pass a decree of declaration declaring that the RFA762017 Page ...
Laxmi Rana vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3362/2018 & CM132632018 W.P.(C) 3375/2018 & CM132822018 W.P.(C) 3376/2018 & CM132832018 PUJA KUMAR LAXMI RANA VASUDHA SRIVASTAVA .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pushpendra Kumar, Mr. Pavan Kumar and Mr. Prevendra Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent No.1-UOI Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above-captioned three petitions, the claim of petitioners is that they were appointed on compassionate ground and they have rendered service of about 16 years. It is case of petitioners that they had sought regularization of their service vide various Representations and the last Representation was made by petitioners to second respondent on 30th January, 2017, which was followed by Reminder of 9th March, ...
Ashok Kumar Choudhury and Anr. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3283/2018 & CM No.12903/2018 ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHURY AND ANR. Through: Ms.Sumita Hazarika, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) 1. Vide office order of 30th January, 2018, respondent-Sahitya Akademi has withdrawn the benefit of first ACP granted to Senior Library and Information Assistants while claiming that the Ministry of Culture has emphasized that while implementing 7th Central Pay Commission Scales, respondent-Sahitya Akademi shall ensure that all such erroneous pay fixation/ACP/MACP cases have to be identified and rectified under intimation to the Ministry of Culture.... Petitioners had made a representation (Annexure P-13) on 7th February, 2018 to respondent-Sahitya Akademi which has been summarily rejected vide impugned office memorandum of 19th/20th February, 2018....
Virender Singh Lakra vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3366/2018 and CM APPL. Nos.13270-71/2018 1. VIRENDER SINGH LAKRA Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate With Mr. Kshitij Mudgal, Mrs. Bandana Singh and Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Sanajay Pal, for R1 to R3. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER0604.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 09.02.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal disposing of O.A. No.636/2018 filed by him for seeking quashment of the notice dated 29.11.2017, issued by the respondent No.2/Office of the Chief Postmaster General, who is the Revisional Authority in this case and has expressed a tentative view that the penalty imposed on him by the Disciplinary Authority of reduction of rank to the postman cadre with immediate effect for a period of three 3 years, must be enhanced to ...
Shalini Yadav vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~21 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :5. h APRIL, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 679/2013 Through : Mr.Ravindra Narayan, Advocate. versus SHALINI YADAV STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr.Abdul Sattar, Advocate for R2. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.REV.P. 627/2014 & CRL.M.A.No.158........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Abdul Sattar, Advocate. RAJESH YADAV STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr.Ravindra Narayan, Advocate for R2. CRL.REV.P. 58/2015, CRL.M.A.Nos.1464-........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Ravindra Narayan, Advocate. SHALINI YADAV versus N C T OF DELHI & ANR Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr.Abdul Sattar, Advocate for R2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + + + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Revision Petition No.679/2013 has been filed by the petitioner Shalini Yadav to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 13.08.2013 of learned Family Court, Sake...
M/S R K Indutries vs.m/s Thukral Steel Corp
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY28 2018 DECIDED ON : APRIL05 2018 CRL.REV.P. 842/2017 & Crl.M.B.1989/2017 M/S R K INDUTRIES Through : Mr.Roshan Santhalia with Mr.Ankit Miglani, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus M/S THUKRAL STEEL CORP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Sanjay Abbot with Mr.Ankit Agarwal, Advocates. ..... Respondent + S.P.GARG, J.The present revision petition is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.Rev.P.841/2017 titled Shiv Shakti Metal Works vs. M/S Thukral Steel Corp. APRIL05 2018/sa (S.P.GARG) JUDGE...
Angelique International Limited vs.ssjv Projects Private Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) 14086/2017 (COMM.) 91/2017 & I.A. Nos.13595/2017, Reserved on:23. h February, 2018 Date of decision:5. h April, 2018 ANGELIQUE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.R.K. Sanghi, Mr.Ishan Sanghi, and Kumar Mr.Satendra Ms.Shreya Rao, Advs. versus SSJV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Prity Sharma and Ms.Rijuta Mohanty, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 19th September, 2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator terminating the arbitration proceedings as far as the claim petition filed by the petitioner is concerned, while proceeding further with the counter claims filed by the respondent no.1.2. Before adverting to the submissions made by the parties, a few facts may be note...
K L Jadhav & Anr vs.abhishek Kumar & Ors (New India Assurnace Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~26 * % + MAC.APP. 94/2018 K L JADHAV & ANR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h April, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Narula, Advocates. versus ABHISHEK KUMAR & ORS (NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for New India Assurance Co. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.40,57,375/- has been awarded to the appellants.2. The accident dated 2nd September, 2015 resulted in the death of Anish Kishor Jadhav. The deceased was aged 25 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition before the Claims tribunal. The deceased was working as Executive - Sales and Technical Support with M/s Nikon India Pvt. Ltd. at a salary of Rs.5 lakh per annum.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.4,61,500/- per annum afte...
Delhi Jal Board vs.vimal Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:05. h April, 2018 15th December, 2018 + W.P. (C) 11041/2004 DELHI JAL BOARD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. versus VIMAL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Avadh Kaushik with Mr.Devashish Maharishi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.Vimal Kumar, (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) 1. was working as Sewer Cleaning Machine (SCM) driver, with the petitioner which was earlier part of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi when he received Office Order No.257 (Distt.) CSE dated 10th September 1990, addressed to him by the petitioner, stating that his name had been struck off from the rolls of the petitioner as SCM driver with immediate effect i.e. 19th November 1990. He assailed his termination by raising an industrial dispute, which stands adjudicated by the Labour Court vide the impugned Award dated 29th May 2003, which holds the termination of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »