Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh @Prem@pawan vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : April 26, 2018 W.P.(CRL.) 2771/2017 RAJESH @ PREM @ PAWAN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jitendra Sethi and Mr.Hemant Gulati, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with SI Virender Kumar, PS Keshav Puram CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(Oral) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks the following prayers:-" In view of the submissions made above, it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may kindly issue writ of mandamous or any other writ or directions/orders to the respondents directing them that the sentence of 7 years awarded to the petitioner in case FIR No.270/2010, P.S. Keshav Puram under Section 392/3IPC and the sentence of 10 years awarded to the petitioner in case and in case FIR No.535/2009, P.S. Maurya Enclave under SectionIPC should run concurrently. Such other or further order(s) which ...
Icici Lombard General Ins. Co Ltd vs.jallan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~14 & 15 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h April, 2018 Through: Mr.Sandeep Jha, Advocate ..... Appellant versus JALLAN & ORS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO LTD + MAC.APP. 1023/2017 & CM No.42594/2017 + MAC.APP. 177/2018 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO LTD JALLAN & ANR versus Through: Mr.Vijay Babbar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vijay Babbar, Advocate ..... Appellants ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Jha, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.4,78,000/- was awarded to respondents no.1 and 2. Vide order dated 6th December, 2017, the Claims Tribunal modified the award to Rs.3,86,280/-.2. The appellant in MAC.APP.1023/2017 is seeking reduction of the MAC. APP. 1023/2017, 177-2018 Page 1 of 4 award amount whereas the appellants in MAC.APP.177/2018 are seeking enhancement of the award amount.3. The acciden...
Kashish Aujla vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2347/2017 KASHISH AUJLA THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Adv. Mr. Akshai Malik, APP SI Raj Kumar, P.S. Kotla Mubarakpur CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.467/2016 under Sections 420 and 120B of the IPC, PS Kotla Mubarakpur.2. The allegations are that the petitioner was one of the Directors of Cupid Holidays Pvt. Ltd. It is alleged that over 25 tickets were booked through the said company which were subsequently cancelled and refunds taken from the airlines and misappropriated.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and petitioner though was a Director was not handling the day- BAIL APPLN....
Manjula Saha & Anr. Vs.maya Rani Saha (Sd) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~3 & 4 * 3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h April, 2018 CONT.CAS(C) 836/2017 MANJULA SAHA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Ms. Aakriti Vohra and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates. (M:9811089104) versus MAYA RANI SAHA (SD) THROUGH LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Bindal and Mr. Anurag Bindal, Advocates (M:9999955947) with Respondent in person. 4 + AND RFA6082016 MANJULA SAHA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Ms. Aakriti Vohra and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates. (M:9811089104) versus MAYA RANI SAHA (SD) THR LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Bindal and Mr. Anurag Bindal, Advocates (M:9999955947) with Respondent in person. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Learned proxy counsel for Mr. S. K. Bhaduri, Advocate for Appellants/Petitioners appears and seeks discharge in the matter. Mr. S. K. Bhaduri, Advocate is discharged in the matter as Mr. Arun Vohra has CONT.CAS(C) 836/2017 & RFA6082016 P...
Uzma Tabassum vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 25, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4206/2018 & C.M. 16530/2018 1. UZMA TABASSUM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, Advocate Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 26th March, 2018 (Annexure P-5) relieves petitioner w.e.f. 24th March, 2018, as it was found that her appointment as Guest Lecturer, was not as per RR Rules.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the appointment of petitioner was as per RR Rules and so, quashing of impugned order of 26th March, 2018 (Annexure P-5) is sought.3. Despite service of advance notice, none appears on behalf of respondent No.4-School.4. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition and application are disposed of with permission to petitioner to make a concise Representation against impugned order of 26th March, 2018 W.P...
Ok Play Auto Pvt. Ltd. Vs.indian Commerce & Industries Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:25. 04.2018 $~J- * % + ARB.P. 637/2016 and I.A. No.4326/2017 OK PLAY AUTO PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Abhinandan Banerjee, Mr. Vipul Kumar and Mr. Akash Chandra Jauhari, Advs. versus INDIAN COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES CO. PVT. LTD. Through Ms.Shalini Kaul and Mr.Anandh K., ..... Respondent Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This petition is filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to secure appointment of an independent and impartial arbitral tribunal for adjudication of the disputes between the parties.2. The petitioner is a company having its registered office at Delhi. The respondent is also a private limited company but having its registered office at Chennai.3. The petitioner in the year 2011 floated a tender for the proposed construction of a factory building at Non-SEZ, Phase-III, Mugundarayapuram, Ranipet, Vellore, Tamil Nadu. The proposal of the ARB.PET.637/2016...
Gulshan Kumar vs.shyam Lal Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % GULSHAN KUMAR RFA No.349/2018 25th April, 2018 Mr. A.K. Sen, Advocate. ..... Appellant Through: versus SHYAM LAL THROUGH LRs CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.16410/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.349/2018 and C.M. No.16409/2018 (stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 23.12.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for specific performance filed by the appellant/plaintiff with respect to the Agreement to Sell dated 24.5.2006 for 1/5th undivided share for land of the RFA No.349/2018 Page 1 of 7 respondent/defendant being 1/5th undivided share in the agricultural land measuring 14 bighas and 8 biswas (equal to 2 bighas 17 bishwas and 1...
Travellers Exchange Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs.celebrities Manageme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~CS-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :25. h APRIL, 2018 + CS (COMM) 51/2016 & IA Nos.1110/2016 (u/O39R-1 & 2 CPC), 5793/2016 (u/O7R-10 CPC), 11(u/S124of the Trade Marks Act) TRAVELLERS EXCHANGE CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Sidhant Goel, Advocate with Mr.Bhardwaj Jaishankar, Advocate. CELEBRITIES MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED versus Through : Mr.Abhishek Puri, Advocate with Mr.V.Siddharth, Advocate. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) Review Petition 62/2018 1. The defendant / applicant seeks review of the order dated 07.12.2017 by which IA No.12078/2016 [u/O XI R-1(5) CPC]. and IA Nos.5793/2016 (u/O VII R-10 CPC and 8144/2016 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) were dealt with. The review petition is contested by the plaintiffs / non-applicants. CS(COMM) 51/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. On 06.09.2017, the case was received on transfer and matter was listed...
Ms. Meenakshi Sharma & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 1033/2018 MS. MEENAKSHI SHARMA & ORS versus Through: Mr. Yatender Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioners GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. K.P.S. Rao and Mr. Nimish Chib, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Received on remand.1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.2.... Petitioners seek compliance of order of 4th December, 2017 (Annexure P-26) passed by Deputy Director of Education (PSB).3. Learned counsel for respondent-School submits that the order of 4th December, 2017 (Annexure P-26) passed by the Deputy Director of Education is under challenge before the Director of Education. On the other hand, learned counsel for petitioners maintains that petitioners have not received any notice from Director of Education in respect of order of 4th December, 2017 (Annexure P-26). It is brought ...
Hemant Dandona vs.naveen Bareja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 537/2017 HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BAREJA Represented by: Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav ..... Respondent + CRL.L.P. 538/2017 Mehdiratta, Advocates. HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BAREJA Represented by: Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav ..... Respondent + CRL.L.P. 539/2017 Mehdiratta, Advocates. HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BAREJA Represented by: Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav ..... Respondent + CRL.L.P. 540/2017 Mehdiratta, Advocates. HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. CRL.L.P. 537/2017 and Conn. matters Page 1 of 4 versus Priyanka Tiwary an...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »