Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jallan & Anr vs.icici Lombard General Ins. Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~14 & 15 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h April, 2018 Through: Mr.Sandeep Jha, Advocate ..... Appellant versus JALLAN & ORS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO LTD + MAC.APP. 1023/2017 & CM No.42594/2017 + MAC.APP. 177/2018 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO LTD JALLAN & ANR versus Through: Mr.Vijay Babbar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vijay Babbar, Advocate ..... Appellants ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Jha, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.4,78,000/- was awarded to respondents no.1 and 2. Vide order dated 6th December, 2017, the Claims Tribunal modified the award to Rs.3,86,280/-.2. The appellant in MAC.APP.1023/2017 is seeking reduction of the MAC. APP. 1023/2017, 177-2018 Page 1 of 4 award amount whereas the appellants in MAC.APP.177/2018 are seeking enhancement of the award amount.3. The acciden...
Hsil Limited vs.saffron Cera and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 841/2016 & IAs No.8281/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 4433/2017 (u/O VIII R-1 CPC), 14401/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) & 14402/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus ALTRA CERAMIC AND ORS Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ..... Defendants + CS(COMM) 842/2016 & IAs No.8302/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 14399/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) & 14400/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) AND + HSIL LTD Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus MARUTI CERAMIC AND ORS Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ..... Defendants AND CS(COMM) 844/2016 & IAs No.8315/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 14403/2017 (u/O XI R-1(5) CPC) & 14404/2017 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Sahil Garg and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus ..... Defendants SAFFRON CERA ...
Big Shoe Bazar India Pvt Ltd. Vs.vivek Gandhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h April, 2018 + RFA7022016 BIG SHOE BAZAR INDIA PVT LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. (M:9958872981) VIVEK GANDHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shalabh Singhal, Advocate. (M:9810653635) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal against the final judgment and decree dated 26th May, 2016 by which the Trial Court has decreed the suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Franchisee) in the following terms: 50. In view of aforesaid discussion of the court, suit of the plaintiff is decreed with cost for recovery of Rs.7,07,981/- (Seven Lakh Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty One) alongwith pendente-lite and future interest @ 13% per annum. 2. A Franchise Agreement (hereinafter Agreement) was entered into between the Appellant/Defendant- BIG SHOE BAZAR INDIA PVT LTD (hereinafter, BSB) which operated an e-commerce website by the name www.bigshoeb...
Smita Chaudhry & Ors vs.lt Col Gaj Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h April, 2018 C.R.P. 96/2017 and CM APPL.14440/2017 (stay) SMITA CHAUDHRY & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Airi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashutosh Chaudhary, Ms. Sukanya Lal, & Ms. Sadhna Sharma, Advocates versus LT COL GAJ SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Bahl, Adv. for R-10. Lt. Col. Atul Chaudhary in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are legal representatives of Satish Chandra Yadav son of Surat Singh, who was impleaded as second defendant in the civil suit (presently registered as CS-DJ-12592/2016), pending on the file of additional district judge-14 of Central District at Tis Hazari Courts Complex. The suit was instituted seeking a decree of partition of the estate of Chaudhary Shib Sahai by Lt. Col. Gaj Singh Yadav CRP No.96/2017...
Lal Mahal Limited Vs.1. Abdul Ghaffar 2. Abdul Ghaffar Abdul Rehman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h April, 2018 CS(OS) No.2554/2008. LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Devander N. Grover, Vishal K. Panwar, Vishrut Raj and Mr. Rameez Siddiqui, Advs.. Versus 1. ABDUL GHAFFAR2 ABDUL GHAFFAR ABDUL REHMAN ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Mehta, Mr. Shreyans Singhvi, Mr. Sumer Singh Sandhu, Ms. Limayinla Jamir, Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat and Ms. Divija Rajkhowa, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff Lal Mahal Limited, then known as Shiv Nath Rai Harnarain (India) Ltd, prior to filing this suit, filed OMP No.300/2001 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), pleading that: (i) M/s. Abdul Ghaffar Abdul Rehman, Karachi, Pakistan, respondent therein and defendant No.2 in this suit, had during October November, 2000 approached the plaintiff for buying sugar and a number of invoices were raised for supplying sugar and a...
Virender Khanna & Associates vs.airport Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 160/2018 & IA52222018 & IA52232018 VIRENDER KHANNA & ASSOCIATES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ramesh Singh, Mr Ranjay Jain, N. and Mr Chiraya Advocates. versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sonal Kumar Singh and Ms Swati, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2604.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 29.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by an arbitral tribunal constituted by a sole arbitrator (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal) to the limited extent that (i) the Arbitral Tribunal has not granted the petitioners claim for recovering a sum of 26,00,000/- that was recovered by the Airport Authority of India (hereafter AAI) by encashment of the Bank Guarantee; and (ii) the Arbitral Tribunal has not awarded interest from O.M.P. ...
State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs.mohd. Faizan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24th February, 2018 Judgment pronounced on:26. h April, 2018 + CRL.A. 1277/2014 MOHD. YASIR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sarin Naved, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP. SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Chandni Mahal. + CRL.A. 320/2015 STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP. SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Chandni Mahal. versus MOHD. FAIZAN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Sarin Naved, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE S.P.GARG HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % (JUDGMENT) 1. On 23rd November, 2012, charges were framed, against Mohd. Yasir the appellant in Crl Appeal 1277/2014 and Mohd. Faizan the respondent in Crl Appeal 320/2015 under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Additionally, Crl Appeal 1277/2014 & Crl Appeal 320/2015 Page 1 of 76 charges were also framed, against, Mohd. Yasir under SectionIPC, and...
Hans Raj (Deceased) Through Lrs vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h April, 2018 CM (M) 25/2015 HANS RAJ (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Ms. Dezy Gaur & Mr. Ravinder Adlakha, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Ms. ...Respondents Soumya Kumar & Mr. Armaan Grover, Advs. for R-4 (f). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are the plaintiffs of the civil suit (suit No.171/2002) which was instituted in 1999 against first to fourth respondents for the reliefs of injunction mandatory and prohibitory, the cause of action claimed being that the said parties (defendants) had carried out certain unauthorized construction in property No.5404, New Market, Ghorewali Sarai, Sadar Bazar, Delhi in which the plaintiffs of the case claim to have an interest. The mandatory injunction sought was directed against the Municipal Corporation of CM (M) No 25/2015 Page 1 of 3 Delhi (MCD) which is impleade...
Harish Kumar Bandhu vs.navyug School Educational Society and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2018 W.P.(C) 6102/2016 HARISH KUMAR BANDHU Through: Ms. Shruti Munjal, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar and Mr. Adhiraj Choudhary, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, ASC for respondent No.2-NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) proceedings of 22nd March, 2016 declaring petitioner ineligible for promotion to the post of Post Graduate Teacher (Hindi) is sought by petitioner, who is a Trained Graduate Teacher in Sanskrit. It is the case of petitioner that he has been teaching Sanskrit for last more than two decades and denial of promotion to petitioner is not justified as in the same very DPC proceedings (Annexure P-6), Murari Lal, who was teaching Zoology, and Manju Devi, who was teaching Botany, have been promoted as PGT in Biology. The...
Professional Audio Video Pte. Ltd. Vs.m-3 Media Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~CP-30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:26. 04.2018 + CO.PET. 441/2016 & CA18932016 PROFESSIONAL AUDIO VIDEO PTE. LTD. Through Mr.Manoj ........ Petitioner Garg Kumar & versus Mr.Siddharth Patra, Adv. M-3 MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through Mr.Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under sections 433 (e), 434(1)(a) and 439(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking winding up of the respondent company.2. It has been pleaded in the petition that the respondent approached the petitioner for supplying of video and broadcasting equipment with top-notch quality. Accordingly, the petitioner agreed to consign the various audio and video broadcasting and sundry equipments through Air Cargo had then delivered at respondent registered office at 7-C, Doctors Lane, Gole Market, New Delhi. Against the said transactions, the petitioner sent various invoices/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »