Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Darshan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs. Vs.bhagya Wanti & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.357/2018 % DARSHAN SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS. 27th April, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. V.P. Rana and Ms. Pooja Wason, Advocates. versus BHAGYA WANTI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.16955/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.357/2018 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed by the plaintiffs in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 23.12.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for partition filed by the appellants/plaintiffs with respect to property of the father of the RFA No.357/2018 Page 1 of 11 appellant/plaintiff. I may note that original plaintiff was Sh. Darshan Singh son of Sh. Udai Singh, who expired during the pendency of the suit and he was th...
Smt. Santosh Kumari vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2846/2018 & CM No.11535/2018 % Date of decision :27. h April, 2018 SMT. SANTOSH KUMARI ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Neha Garg, Adv. along with petitioner in person. TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. AND ORS. versus Through : Mr. R.S. Lathwal, Adv. for R-1. ...... RESPONDENTS Ms. Renuka Arora and Mr. Sumit Rana, Advs. for R- 2/DSIDC. Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for North DMC with Mr. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The original record of the DSIDC - respondent no.2 relating to the petitioner has been produced before us.2. It appears that the DSIDC had allotted an industrial plot under the relocation scheme of industries to M/s Prakash Art Press, a business which was being run by Late Shri Prem Prakash, the deceased husband of the petitioner.3. The DSIDC had processed the requ...
The Kangra Co Operative Bank Ltd vs.seema Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
#21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 04.2018 LPA862018, C.M. Nos. 8590/2018 & 8591/2018 THE KANGRA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD ..... Appellant versus SEEMA SHARMA FortheAppellant FortheRespondent Advocates who appeared in this case: :Mr.RajatArora,Advocate : None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act assails the judgment and order dated 17.01.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (C) No.10740/2017 titled as The Kangra Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Ms. Seema Sharma, whereby the petition instituted on behalf of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as management) was dismissed, whilst holding that they LPA862018 Page 1 of 10 failed to prove that a fair and proper enquiry was conducted against the respondent (hereinafter referred to as workman).2. The facts as are necessa...
Ravinder vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3317/2017 Reserved on:16. h March 2018 Decided on:26. h April 2018 RAVINDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advocate Isha Aggarwal, with Ms. Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mrs. Tripathi, Advocate with Mr. Shikhar Khare, Mr. Motish Kumar Singh, Mr. Saurabh Sachdev, Advocates for R-3/IHBAS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Neelima JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. The... Petitioner came to this Court on 25th November 2017 with this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the release of his 71 year old father, Mr. Ram Kumar @ Ram Kanwar (Respondent No.4), from illegal detention at the Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) (Respondent No.3) at W.P.(C) No.3317/2017 Page...
S C Sood vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :26. h APRIL, 2018 Through : Mr.Girish Chandra, Advocate with Mr.Sankalp Agrawal & Mr.Rahul Pandey, Advocates. versus CRL.REV.P. 478/2014 S C SOOD GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP. Mr.Prakash Sharma, Advocate for R2. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 03.06.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A. 5/2014 whereby the appellate court declined to proceed with disposal of the appeal due to settlement arrived at between the parties before Lok Adalat. The petition is contested by the respondent No.2 (hereinafter as respondent).2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Indisputably, the respondent was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments ...
Gail(india) Ltd. Vs.m/s. Lanco Tanjore Power Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 179/2018 & IA No.5673/2018 & CAV3662018 GAIL(INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Yoginder Handoo, Advocate. versus Through: Mr Manu Seshadri and Mr Ishan Bisht, Advocates. M/S. LANCO TANJORE POWER CO. LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2604.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 GAIL (India) Ltd. (hereafter GAIL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 23.12.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the arbitral tribunal constituted by the sole arbitrator, Justice (Retired) Parthasakha Datta, (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. By the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has rejected GAILs claim for a sum of 2,43,74,932/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on account of price differential between Administered Price Mechanism (APM) Gas and non-APM Gas in respect of additional...
Ashok Kumar Gulati vs.reeta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~8 & 9 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 77/2017 & CM APPL. 2316/2017 ASHOK KUMAR GULATI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S. K. Vashistha along with Mr.Kartikay Sharma, Advs. versus REETA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. N. Parashar, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv for R-4. + MAC.APP. 683/2017 REETA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S. N. Parashar, Adv. versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv for R-3. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident dated 01st December, 2014 resulted in the death of Anjani Kumar. The deceased aged about 22 years at the time of accident and was survived by his mother and sister who claimed compensation before the MAC. APP. Nos.77/2017 & 683/2017 Page 1 of 4 Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 16,35,000/- to the claimants. The Claims Tribunal granted recovery rights to the ...
Gopal Dutt vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~R-41 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.928/2002 GOPAL DUTT Through: Mr. Rabindra Singh and Mr. Paras ........ Petitioner Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % ORDER2604.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10th October 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karkardooma Courts, Shahdara, Delhi in Sessions Case No.133/1999 arising out of FIR No.552/1997 registered at Police Station (PS) Gokulpuri, convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 11th October 2002 sentencing him to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. Original charges 2. At the outset, it should be noted that the Appellant was sent up for trial along with three other co-accused, i...
M/S Shreedhar Milk Food Ltd vs.m/s United India Insurance co.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h April, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 345/2017 M/S SHREEDHAR MILK FOOD LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Ritika Jhurani and Mr.Dinesh Sharma, Advs. versus M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Pradeep Gaur and Mr.Amit Gaur, Advs. . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 03.06.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Standard Fire and Special Perils Insurance Policy bearing Policy No.040801/11/13/11/00000259, taken by the petitioner from the respondent for a sum of Rs.98.50 crores for the period 26.03.2014 to 25.03.2015.2. On the night of 21.04.2014 a fire had broken out in the Milk Powder G...
Abdul Sattar (Decd.) Thru Lrs. Vs.mohd. Wakil & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2018
$~8 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"26th April, 2018 R.C. (REV.) 515/2011 ABDUL SATTAR (DECD.) THRU LRS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Bhalla, Adv. Versus MOHD. WAKIL & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Nikhil Malhotra & Mr. Vinod Malhotra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners was impleaded as respondent in the eviction case (E-352/2009) instituted by the respondents herein on 13.08.1998 seeking order of eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The case was contested and at the stage of trial, both sides led evidence. The Additional Rent Controller, by judgment dated 24.09.2011, repelled all the defences taken by the petitioners and granted eviction order which is under challenge by the petition at hand.2. The bone of contention here concerns premises described as property bearing No.946, Haveli Azam Khan, Jama Masjid, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »