Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narayan Diwakar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on :20. h March, 2018 Date of decision :23. d April, 2018 CRL.A452018 & Crl. M. (Bail) 73/2018 NARAYAN DIWAKAR ..... Appellant Through Dr. Sushil Gupta, Adv. versus CENRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP for CBI with Mr. Philomon Kani, Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Hansika Sahu, Ms. Damini K., Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ORDER ANU MALHOTRA, J.Crl. M. (Bail) 73/2018 1. The appellant/applicant seeks grant of interim suspension of the sentence imposed on him vide order on sentence dated 04.01.2018 of the learned Special Judge (PC Act) CBI-03, (North West District), Rohini Courts, Delhi in case No.CBI-102/2016 CNR No.DLNW-01- 000070-2006 whereby the appellant/applicant vide the impugned CRL.A4520187 & Crl. M. (Bail) 73/2018 Page 1 of 20 judgment dated 22.12.2017 was convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 419/468/471 as well as 420 of the Indian Penal Co...
National Highways Authority of India vs.mumbai Nasik Expressway Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 168/2018 & IA Nos. 5389-5391/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Manish K. Bishnoi and Ms ........ Petitioner Ila Haldia, Advocates. versus MUMBAI NASIK EXPRESSWAY LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2304.2018 Through ..... Respondent VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter NHAI) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning the orders dated 09.12.2017 and 23.01.2018 (hereafter the impugned orders) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). By the impugned order dated 09.12.2017, the Arbitral Tribunal declined to reconsider its directions in relation to the arbitral fee as contained in its earlier order dated 28.05.2017, whereby the Arbitral Tribunal had directed the parties to deposit a sum of 10,00,000/- in favour of each of the arbitrators to be shared equally by the part...
National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd vs.harvinder Singh & Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:23. d April, 2018 + FAO(OS) 259/2017 & CM No.34818/2018 NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD Appellant Through: Mr.Anup J.Bhambhani, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajat Arora, Advocate Versus HARVINDER SINGH & COMPANY Respondent Through: Mr. Bhrighu Dhami and Mr. Ankur Nagar, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % (JUDGMENT) C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. We had, after hearing learned counsel for the parties, pronounced our order, on 23rd April, 2018, dismissing the present appeal, for reasons to be recorded separately. This judgment proceeds to record the reasons for our decision. FAO (OS) 259/2017 Page 1 of 21 2. M/s Container Corporation of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as CONCOR) invited tenders for construction of the pavement for development of the DCT, Okhla, New Delhi. Among others, the appellant herein, M/s National Project Construction Corporation Ltd., submitted its...
M/S O-Zone Networks Private Limited & Anr. Vs.lt. Col. Pawan S. Yadav ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.335/2018 + % M/S O-ZONE NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. 23rd April, 2018 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellants versus LT. COL. PAWAN S. YADAV (RETIRED) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P. Bashista and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.345/2018 Counsel appears for the caveator. Caveat accordingly stands discharged. RFA No.335/2018 & CM Nos. 15673/2018 (stay) & 15674-77/2018 (Exemption) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant nos. 1 and 2 against the impugned order of the trial court dated 15.2.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff RFA No.335/2018 Page 1 of 5 under Order XXXVII CPC on account of non-compliance by the appellants/defendants of a conditional order of grant of leave to defend which w...
K. D. Biswal vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 714/2018 K. D. BISWAL ........ Petitioner CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : : Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Mr. Siddharth S. Yadav, Advs. Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Adv. JUDGMENT2304.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in RC No.09(A)/2018-DLI, U/S-(l)(d)/ 13 (2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station Anti Corruption Branch, CBI.2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2018. The petitioner is alleged to have demanded bribe @ 3% of the total bail amount (i.e. Rs. 19500/-). BAIL APPLN. 714/2018 Page 1 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation is complete and there is no likelihood of the petitioner either influencing the ...
Usha Rawat vs.ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3974/2018 & CMs 15694-95/2018 + W.P.(C) 3979/2018 & CMs 15701-02/2018 + W.P.(C) 4045/2018 & CMs 15965-66/2018 + W.P.(C) 4047/2018 & CMs 15969-70/2018 RIVA SINGH ANJU VERMA LEENA BHATTACHARYA USHA RAWAT Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate .....Petitioners versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS Through: Mr.Gursharan Singh, Advocate with Mr. Baljit Singh, OSD, Zone-18, DOE .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. The grievance made in the above-captioned four petitions is that petitioners are not getting their salary from the month of September, 2017 and therefore, they are finding it difficult to survive. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that although the case of petitioners is at par with the case of petitioner in W.P.(C) 3815/2018 titled Prakash Dagar v Ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors. decided on 18th April, 2018 by this Court, but petitioners are...
M/S Sikka Kwick Handling Services (P) Ltd vs.m/s Unistyle Images Pvt L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d April, 2018 + RFA6352016 & CM APPL. 31482/2016 M/S SIKKA KWICK HANDLING SERVICES (P) LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Sapra, Advocate (M- 9312223395). versus M/S UNISTYLE IMAGES PVT LTD Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) challenging the order dated 31st March, 2016. The Plaintiff had instituted a suit for recovery against the Defendant/Respondent (hereinafter, Defendant) claiming a sum of Rs.3,57,550/-. After summons was issued in this suit, the Defendant did not appear and accordingly on 13th May, 2015, the Defendant was proceeded ex-parte. The Trial Court, thereafter, recorded ex-parte evidence on behalf of the Plaintiff.2. The Plaintiffs witness Mr. Harvinder Singh, Assistant Manager, apart from his authorization produced the following documents: i) ii) RFA6352016 Original B...
Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10515/2016 Date of decision:23. d April, 2018. PUNJ LLOYD LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Sapre and Mr. K. Gurumurthy, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Sr. Advocate for UOI. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Advocate for R-2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) M/s Punj Lloyd Limited has filed the present writ petition impugning notices dated 11th July, 2016, 5th August, 2016, 29th September, 2016 and 17th October, 2016, issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Rajkot Regional Unit, Gujarat, as being without jurisdiction and arbitrary.2.... Petitioner submits that earlier investigation and inquiries against the petitioner had resulted in communication/letter dated 19th November, 2014.... Petitioner h...
Dinesh Singh Rawat vs.chairman & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:23. 04.2018 LPA2192018, CM APPL. 15839/2018, CM APPL. 15840/2018 & CM APPL. 15841/2018 DINESH SINGH RAWAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate. versus CHAIRMAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel (Service) for respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act impugns the judgment and order dated 23.03.2018 rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.8294/2017, titled as Dinesh Singh Rawat vs. Chairman, Ryan International School, whereby the same was disposed off with a direction to the respondent/School to conclude the enquiry in pursuance of the charge sheet dated 04.07.2017 issued to the appellant, within a period of three months from the date already fixed.2. Before we proceed to adjudicate ...
Patliputra Credit and Securities Ltd vs.prakash Chandra Yadav & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.P.A. 53/2013 #16 PATLIPUTRA CREDIT AND SECURITIES LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate versus PRAKASH CHANDRA YADAV & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Nitesh Jain with Ms. Shruti Pandey and Mr Abhinav Mukhi, Advocates Date of Decision:23. d April, 2018 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for possession, recovery of damages and mesne profit of Flat No.307, 3rd Floor, Adeshwar Apartments, 34, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi.2. 3. Initially, the suit was filed by the plaintiff as in forma pauperis. This Court vide a detailed order dated 28th August, 2017 dismissed the plaintiffs application under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC. However, this Court permitted the plaintiff to deposit the shortfall in the court fees IPA532013 Page 1 of 3 within three months. The matter was directed to be listed on 11th December, 2017.4. Thereafter the plaintiff filed two applications being I....
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »