Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Arora vs.shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~14 & 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 465/2017 SANJAY ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Singh & Ms. Kusum Lata, Advocates. versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani & Mr. + MAC.APP. 466/2017 Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advs. for R-1. SANJAY ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Singh & Ms. Kusum Lata, Advocates. SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani & Mr. Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Both these appeals arise out of common judgment rendered by 1. the motor accident claims tribunal on the file of two claim cases (suit MAC Appeal No.465-66/2017 Page 1 of 4 No.482/2013 and 427/2014) of Rushi and Tinku Gupta, seeking compensation for injuries suffered by them in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 07.04.2013 when the car in which they were travel...
Ashok vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :24. h APRIL, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 518/2018 ........ Petitioner Through : None. versus ASHOK STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel. SI Prashant, PS New Usmanpur. + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 427(1) and Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to direct the concurrent running of the sentences in FIR No.431/2009 registered under SectionsIPC at Police Station New Usmanpur. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner was convicted by the Trial Court for commission of offences punishable under SectionsIPC by a judgment dated 07.12.2010. By an order on sentence dated 10.12.2010, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo RI for three years with fine `1,000/- under Section 363 and RI for ten years with fine `5,00...
Himani Malhotra vs.the Indraprastha College for Women and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2018 W.P.(C) 4103/2018 & CMs 16151-53/2018 HIMANI MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Neela Gokhle and Ms. Shradha Agrawal, Advocates THE INDRAPRASTHA COLLEGE FOR WOMEN AND ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Prang Newmai and Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocates for respondent- University CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 4th April, 2018 rejects petitioners prayer for recusal by Inquiry Officer while noting as under: - To deal with her first contention, I fail to understand as to how my past membership of University Court and of Executive Council of University of Delhi can affect my independence and impartiality to conduct the present enquiry against the DE and how the same can be against the principles of natural justice. University Court of Delhi University is an Apex Body of University of Delhi comprising...
dr.lokesh Kumar Meena vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.T. Singhdev, Adv. for R- 2/MCI. Ms.Anita Sahani, Adv. for R- 3/GGSIP University. $~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) No.4131/2018 & & C.M. Nos.16251-16252/2018 DR.LOKESH KUMAR MEENA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.R.K. Saini, Adv. with Mr.Shekhar Kumar, Adv. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner, who is a Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidate for NEET Post Graduate 2018, has impugned the order dated 6th April, 2018, passed by respondent no.1/Union of India, whereby the respondent no.1 after consulting with respondent no.2/Medical Council of India, decided that the lowering, if any, of the cut-off percentile in NEET PG2018required for ST candidates in accordance with the discretion vested in the Union of India as per the proviso to Sub-Clause III of Clause 9 of Post Graduate Me...
Pawan Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI4 6 & 7 + CRL.A.188 /2018 & Crl.M.B.286/2018 SAVITRI DEVI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari and Ms. Surabhi Dhar, Advocates versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State + CRL.A.1106 /2017 PAWAN SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates versus ....Respondent Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State STATE + CRL.A.59 /2018 SUDHIR SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State Crl.A.188/2018 & connected appeals Page 1 of 25 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2404.2018 1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 28th November, 2016 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (DSJ) in Sessions Case No.483/2016 arising out of an FIR No.271/2013 regi...
N K Wadhwa vs.central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 6437/2017 & CM266852017 (ii) + W.P.(C) 6438/2017 & CM266862017 (iii) + W.P.(C) 6439/2017 & CM266872017 (i & ii) N K WADHWA (iii) A K RAJPUT .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Nischal and Mr. Arun Nischal, Advocates Versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. P.S. Datta, Ms. Anwesha Saha and Mrs. Shobha Bhisht, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) the above-captioned three petitions, vide impugned 1. In Memorandums of 22nd February, 2010 and 8th March, 2010, departmental proceedings stood initiated against petitioners. In the case of petitioner-N K Wadhwa [in W.P.(C) 6437/2017]., Inquiry Report of 10th February, 2015 indicts him of the charges framed against him, whereas Inquiry Report of 27th March, 2015 also indicts petitioner-N K Wadhwa [in W.P.(C) 6438/2017]. and holds him guilty in respect of one of the charges and ...
Janodaya Ekta Samiti (Regd.) vs.goverment of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~1, 4, 15, 17 & 18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2018 1 + W.P.(C) 1873/2018 & C.M.7782/2018 NAFISA BEGUM SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC) & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS 4 17 18 15 versus versus ........ Petitioner JANODAYA EKTA SAMITI (REGD.) GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. DWARKA SECTOR6VENDORS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10206/2017 + W.P.(C) 4818/2016, C.M.Nos.20093/2016 & 28458/2016 + W.P.(C) 8042/2016, C.M.Nos.33341/2016, 34847/2016, 45806/2016, + W.P.(C) 1711/2017 AJAY MAKEN COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. versus AJAY MAKEN GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI versus 36086/2016 & 38104/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) No.1873/2018 Page 1 of 5 Present: Mr.Rajat Malhotra and Ms.Veera Mehra, Advocates for the petitioner in item no.1. Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Adv. for SDMC/R-1 i...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.shama Parveen & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: April 24, 2018 + MAC.APP. 774/2014 ..... Appellant THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate 1. Versus SHAMA PARVEEN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Jha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Appellant is the Insurer of bus bearing No.DL-1PB-5035, which was involved in a vehicular accident on 29th November, 2010 and in the said accident, one Mohd. Jahangir, aged around 40 years (as per Post Mortem Report), who was working as rickshaw pullar, had died. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), vide impugned Award of 11th July, 2014, has awarded compensation of ` 9,53,476.80/- to respondents-claimants along with interest @ 9% p.a. The facts, as noticed in the impugned Award, are as under:-"Brief facts as epitomized in present petition are that on fateful day i.e. 29.11.2010 at about 08.05 pm, the driver of the offending vehicle bus bear...
Olympic Oil Industries Ltd. Vs.practical Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (MISC.) 3/2017 & IA Nos. 10353/2017 and OLYMPIC OIL INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Decree Holder 10355/2017 Through: Mr Jagdeep Anand with Ms Shakya Sen, Advocates. versus PRACTICAL PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. Through: Mr Ashish Virmani and Ms ..... Judgment Debtor Sukriti Gandhi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2404.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying as under:-"a) This Honble Court may kindly extend the period/mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal comprising Shri Dinesh Kumar Seth, Advocate, Sole Arbitrator by 12 months in Claim Petition No.5 of 2016 titled (titled M/s. Olympic Oil Industries Ltd. Vs. M/s. Practical Properties Pvt. Ltd.); 2. The petitioner claims that the disputes that are the subject matter of the arbitral proceedings in question relate to an Agreement OMP(MISC.) 3/2017 P...
Nafisa Begum vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation (Sdmc) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~1, 4, 15, 17 & 18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2018 1 + W.P.(C) 1873/2018 & C.M.7782/2018 NAFISA BEGUM SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC) & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS 4 17 18 15 versus versus ........ Petitioner JANODAYA EKTA SAMITI (REGD.) GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. DWARKA SECTOR6VENDORS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10206/2017 + W.P.(C) 4818/2016, C.M.Nos.20093/2016 & 28458/2016 + W.P.(C) 8042/2016, C.M.Nos.33341/2016, 34847/2016, 45806/2016, + W.P.(C) 1711/2017 AJAY MAKEN COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. versus AJAY MAKEN GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI versus 36086/2016 & 38104/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) No.1873/2018 Page 1 of 5 Present: Mr.Rajat Malhotra and Ms.Veera Mehra, Advocates for the petitioner in item no.1. Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Adv. for SDMC/R-1 i...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »