Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 24 2018

Aar Ess Remedies Pvt Ltd vs.glaxo Group Ltd and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2018 + RFA(OS)(COMM) 21/2017 and CM Nos. 41960/2017, 41963/2017, 15300/2018 AAR ESS REMEDIES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms Aastha Gupta, Adv for Mr Manish Vashisth, Adv versus GLAXO GROUP LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shwetasree Majumder and Ms Tanya Varma, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present Regular First Appeal is taken up for final hearing for disposal. The present appeal arises out of a judgment and decree dated 27.07.2017. The respondents had filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants (appellant being one of the defendants), their partners, proprietors, servants, agents, affiliates, sister concerns, etc. from manufacturing selling, offering for sale, advertising, dealing in products which are identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs r...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

M/S Salguti Industries & Anr. Vs.m/s j.p Textiles

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h April, 2018 + M/S SALGUTI INDUSTRIES & ANR. RFA3762017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shashi Shankar, Ms. Ekta Raghav and Mr. Subrat Tripathi, Advocates (M-9810433650) versus M/S J.P TEXTILES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.S. Verma, Advocate (M- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH997119041) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment/order dated 30th November, 2016 by which the suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff was decreed in the following terms:-"(15) In view of my findings on the various issues above, the plaintiff is held entitled to the principal amount of Rs.2,78,651/- with interest @ 10% per annum on the said amount from the date of filing of the suit till realization of the amount and costs of the suit. 2. A suit for recovery was filed by the Plaintiff M/s J.P. Textiles (hereinafter Plaintiff) against two Defendants, namely, Salguti Industries Ltd. (hereinafter Defendan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

A K Rajput vs.central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisatio ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 6437/2017 & CM266852017 (ii) + W.P.(C) 6438/2017 & CM266862017 (iii) + W.P.(C) 6439/2017 & CM266872017 (i & ii) N K WADHWA (iii) A K RAJPUT .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Nischal and Mr. Arun Nischal, Advocates Versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. P.S. Datta, Ms. Anwesha Saha and Mrs. Shobha Bhisht, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) the above-captioned three petitions, vide impugned 1. In Memorandums of 22nd February, 2010 and 8th March, 2010, departmental proceedings stood initiated against petitioners. In the case of petitioner-N K Wadhwa [in W.P.(C) 6437/2017]., Inquiry Report of 10th February, 2015 indicts him of the charges framed against him, whereas Inquiry Report of 27th March, 2015 also indicts petitioner-N K Wadhwa [in W.P.(C) 6438/2017]. and holds him guilty in respect of one of the charges and ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Savitri Devi vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI4 6 & 7 + CRL.A.188 /2018 & Crl.M.B.286/2018 SAVITRI DEVI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari and Ms. Surabhi Dhar, Advocates versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State + CRL.A.1106 /2017 PAWAN SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates versus ....Respondent Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State STATE + CRL.A.59 /2018 SUDHIR SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State Crl.A.188/2018 & connected appeals Page 1 of 25 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2404.2018 1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 28th November, 2016 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (DSJ) in Sessions Case No.483/2016 arising out of an FIR No.271/2013 regi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Dwarka Sector 6 Vendors Association vs.delhi Development Authority and ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

$~1, 4, 15, 17 & 18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2018 1 + W.P.(C) 1873/2018 & C.M.7782/2018 NAFISA BEGUM SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC) & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS 4 17 18 15 versus versus ........ Petitioner JANODAYA EKTA SAMITI (REGD.) GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. DWARKA SECTOR6VENDORS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10206/2017 + W.P.(C) 4818/2016, C.M.Nos.20093/2016 & 28458/2016 + W.P.(C) 8042/2016, C.M.Nos.33341/2016, 34847/2016, 45806/2016, + W.P.(C) 1711/2017 AJAY MAKEN COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. versus AJAY MAKEN GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI versus 36086/2016 & 38104/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) No.1873/2018 Page 1 of 5 Present: Mr.Rajat Malhotra and Ms.Veera Mehra, Advocates for the petitioner in item no.1. Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Adv. for SDMC/R-1 i...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Nitin Gupta & Anr vs.new Delhi Municipal Council

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"24.04.2018 NITIN GUPTA & ANR + W.P.(C) 2882/2018 & CM Nos.11607-609/2018 versus Through Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw, Adv. ........ Petitioners NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Malavika Trivedi, ASC with Ms.Sriparna Choudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner, who is the co-owner of property bearing Nos.1-7, 31-32 and 48-49 in block-F, has sought quashing of the assessment order dated 29.12.2017 passed by the respondent under Section 72 of the NDMC Act, whereby the rateable value in respect of the aforesaid property has been substantially increased w.e.f. 2002-03. The petitioner has also challenged the consequential demands raised by the respondent.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned assessment order has been passed after an inordinate delay. He submits that the petitioner was initially issued a notice ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

M/S Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. Vs.m/s Swadeshi Polytex Lim ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 550/2017 M/S INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Manoj Arora and Mr. Siddharth Shankar, Advocates. versus M/S SWADESHI POLYTEX LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Ghose and Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Having perused the impugned judgment dated 10th July, 2017 whereby on the day the evidence of the complainant was closed, statement of the accused was recorded and as per the learned counsel for the complainant without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the impugned judgment was passed. Thus this Court deems it fit to grant leave to appeal.2. Petition is disposed of granting leave to the petitioner. Crl.A.No./2018 1.2. Registry is directed to number the appeal. Admit. CRL .L.P. 550/2017 Page 1 of 4 3. Appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 Negotiable In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Laxmi Public School and Anr vs.ms. Nupur Mahajan and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3819/2018 & CM151472018 1. LAXMI PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR Through: Mr. Pramod Gupta, Advocate .....Petitioners versus MS. NUPUR MAHAJAN AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Advocate for respondent No.2 Dr. Surya Kant Prasad, DEO, Zone-01 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Vide order of 31st March, 2016 (Annexure P-6), first respondent has been relieved of her designation of Vice Principal w.e.f. 31st March, 2016, with clarification that the aforesaid relieving will not have any financial implication and first respondent shall continue to work as PGT (English) in petitioner-School. However, the aforesaid order was revised by way of Office Order of 1st April, 2016 (Annexure P-7) by petitioner- School. Aforesaid Office Order of 1st April, 2016 states that first respondent has been relieved from the post of Vice Principal w.e.f. 31s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018