Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt Arvinder Kaur Bedi and Anr. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) No.1010/2018 & C.M. No.4291/2018 SMT ARVINDER KAUR BEDI AND ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sriharsha Peechara, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) for NDMC.1. The... Petitioners, who were licensees of Shop Nos. 36 & 37, Gole Market, New Delhi from 17th November, 1998 have filed the present petition seeking quashing of order dated 29th November, 2017, vide which the aforesaid shops have been sealed. The... Petitioners also seek quashing of order dated 20th December, 2017, vide which the license in favour of the... Petitioners was cancelled.2. Learned counsel for the... Petitioners points out that the... Petitioners licenses were being renewed from time to time and the last renewal granted to the petitioners had expired on 31st WP (C) No.1010/2018 Page 1 of 6 March, 2013. ...
Rakesh @ Raju & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL24 2018 + CRL.A.1059/2017 RAKESH @ RAJU & ORS. ..... Appellants STATE Through : Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Jatan Singh, Mr.Gujral and Mr.Karan Khanuja, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP. Insp.Anish Tyagi, PS Shahbad Dairy. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.B.2052/2017 1. The appellants Rakesh @ Raju (A-1), Raj Kumar (A-2), Deepak @ Deepu @ DK (A-3), Krishan (A-4) and Bhagwan Singh @ Mukesh (A-5) seek suspension of sentence till the disposal of the appeal. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Learned Senior counsel for the appellants urged that the impugned judgment based upon dying declaration of the deceased Crl.M.B.2052/2017 in Crl.A.1059/2017 Page 1 of 5 cannot be sustained particularly when the trial court did not believe the testimonies of PW-1 (Azad Rathi) and PW-4 (Sunny). The sai...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.mukti Jana & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2018 + MAC.APP. 788/2015 & C.M. 23509/2015 1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Komal Dhingra & Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Advocates Versus MUKTI JANA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 16th July, 2015 grants compensation of (ORAL) `4,00,635/- with interest @ 9% per annum to respondent-injured-Mukti Jana, aged 39 years, on account of grievous injury suffered by respondent-Injured in a vehicular accident, which took place on 18th November, 2013. The facts as noticed in the impugned Award are as under:-"Brief facts, as stated in the petition are that on 18.11.2013 at about 08.30 AM, Mukti Jana along with his brother was riding a scooter No.DL-6SP-2546 was proceedings from their home at Hari Nagar, PS. Badarpur to Patiala House Courts and while they reached near Tata Indicom Office at Mathura Road, New Friends Colo...
Sunil Kukreja vs.north West Sales and Marketing Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~24 & 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h April, 2018 + 44 + O.M.P. (COMM) 456/2017 SUNIL KUKREJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil Kher, Sr. Adv. with Mr.D.R. and Bhatia, Mr.Kunal Kher Ms.Subiya Akbar Warsi, Advs. versus NORTH WEST SALES AND MARKETING LTD. ..... Respondent Singh, Ms.Manisha Through: Mr.Ramesh Handa and Mr.Chirayu Jain, Advs. O.M.P. (COMM) 56/2018 NORTH WEST SALES & MARKETING LTD.THROUGH IT'S AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SH. BABRU BAHAN SAMAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, Ms.Manisha Handa and Mr.Chirayu Jain, Advs. versus SUNIL KUKREJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Anil Kher, Sr. Adv. with Mr.D.R. and Bhatia, Mr.Kunal Kher Ms.Subiya Akbar Warsi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the Arbitral Award dated 22.08.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 456/2017 & OMP(COMM) 56/2018 Page 1 passed by the Sole Arb...
Mushtak Ahmed vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : April 24, 2018 CRL.A. 1034/2016 ..... Appellant MUSHTAK AHMED Represented by: Mr.Pawan Kumar Mittal, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Amit Gupta, APP for the State with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Govind Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A.No.14399/2017 By this application, the appellant seeks to place on record the compromise/settlement between the appellant and the complainant along with their affidavits. The same are taken on record. Application is disposed of. Crl.A.No.1034/2016 1. Appellant, Mushtak Ahmed has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326 IPC in case FIR No.159/2013 registered at PS Govind Puri on the complaint of Constable Mahender who had apprehended the appellant red handed at the spot giving knife injuries to his nephew Mobin Sidduqui. Later statement of Mobin Sidduqui was also recorded. Mobin Sidduqui appeared in the witness...
Sh. Prempal Singh & Anr. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2018 FAO2112014 ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Pankaj Kumari for Mr. S. N. Parashar, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Gurkirat Kaur and Mr. Archita Jain, Advocates. Versus SH. PREMPAL SINGH & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. UNION OF INDIA This appeal impugns an order dated 26.11.2013 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal dismissing the appellants claim for compensation on account of the demise of their son Mr. Lokender Singh in a rail accident. It is the appellants case that the deceased who used to work in Delhi, on 05.09.2011 during his return rail journey to Muradabad he got the space only near the gate, due to heavy rush in the rail compartment. En-route due to a sudden jerk and push in the train, he fell from the moving train, came under its track and his body was cut into two. It is not in dispute that a valid passenger ticket alongwith a mobile phone was fo...
Nitin Mewari vs.the State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1204/2017 NITIN MEWARI versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. Rajiv Khosla with Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocates. Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh, Advocate for the complainant. SI Harpal Singh, PS Paharganj. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2404.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.87/2017 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Pahar Ganj.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the prosecutrix as well as the petitioner were known to each other for last over five years. The petitioner is alleged to have entered into a physical relationship with the prosecutrix on the false promise to marry. The FIR alleges that both the parties belong to the same caste and, as such, their fam...
Shailendra Singh and Ors. Vs.lt. Governor Through: Chief Secretary Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4121/2018 & C.Ms. 16228-30/2018 SHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Mr. Tarun Kumar and Mr. Nikhil Patnail, Advocates Versus LT. GOVERNOR THROUGH: CHIEF SECRETARY DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, Mr. N.K. Singh, Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.1 to 3-GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners claim that they are working as Guest Teachers for the last 3 to 7 years and they have right to seek regularization of their service in terms of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Bill, 2017. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that a concise and composite Representation will be filed on behalf of the petitioners to third respondent within a week. If such a Representation is received by third respondent, then it be considered and decided within four weeks by passing a speaking o...
Akash Khilwani vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~45 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3390/2018 and CM No.13351/2017 % Date of decision :24. h April, 2018 AKASH KHILWANI UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Ishaan Madaan and Mr. Ayush S. Sahni, Advs. Through : Ms. Srivastava, CGSC ....Respondents Suparna CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The petitioner in this case was appointed as Additional Directors of the company being Open Kitchen on 6th April, 2011 but was never confirmed as a Director. Since his appointment was never confirmed as a Director, he ceased to be a Director from the date the AGM should have been held i.e. 30th September, 2011. As such the petitioner ceased to be the Directors of the company by operation of law but he continued to be shown as an Additional Director of the company. WP(C) No.3390/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The writ petition has been instituted in view of the notices dated...
Ashok Gupta vs.commissioner of Customs (Import & General)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~35 and 36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSTOM A. 1/2018 Date of decision:24. h April, 2018 ASHOK GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Madhumita Bhattachargee and Mr. Atanusaikia, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. ..... Respondent CUSTOM A. 2/2018 SANJAY SACHDEVA & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Madhumita Bhattachargee and Mr. Atanusaikia, Advocates. vesus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA J.(ORAL) CUSTOM A. Nos. 1/2018 & 2/2018 Page 1 of 8 At the outset, counsel for the appellants states that the afore- stated appeals may be treated as appeals preferred by Ashok Gupta, Sanjay Sachdeva and Anuradha Di...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »