Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjeev Sharma vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2018 CRL.REV.P. 199/2017 SANJEEV SHARMA GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Randhir Jain with Mr. Dhananjai Jain and Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocates with petitioner in person. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Inder Pal, PS Vikas Puri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2404.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 199/2017 & Crl.M.A.13186/2017 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 02.03.2017, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner seeking to plead guilty through counsel, in his absence, was rejected by the Trial Court and, further, he is aggrieved by the issuance of non-bailable warrants and initiation of proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. CRL.REV.P. 199/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. The petitioner was charged with having committed an offence under Section 40(a) of ...
Ritu Raj vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4117/2018 & CMs. 16223-24/2018 1. RITU RAJ Through: Mr. Amit Verma, Advocate .....Petitioner Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 3-GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief claimed in this petition, a Representation of 3rd July, 2017 (Annexure P-8) has been already made by petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to the said Representation. The result was declared in June 2017 and the said Representation was made in July, 2017. It is pointed out that thereafter, petitioner had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal in August, 2017 and the original application was withdrawn in December, 2017 to enable petitioner to seek remedy before appropriate Judicial Forum.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed ...
M/S N N Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS)(COMM) 75/2018 Date of decision:24. h April, 2018 $~37 * + % M/S N N BUILDCON PVT LTD Through Mr. Vineet Mendiretta and Mr. Imran Moulaey, Advocates. ..... Appellant Jhanji, Ms. Jyoti UNION OF INDIA versus Through Mr. Government Standing Counsel. Rajesh ..... Respondent Gogna, Central CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) This intra-Court appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, for short) and Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns the order dated 14th March, 2018 passed by a single Judge in O.M.P. (COMM) 119/2018, NN Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India. The impugned order dismisses the objection petition filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Act and upholds the arbitral Award dated 25th December, 2017 (corrected vide communication dated 5th J...
Sanjay Sachdeva & Anr. Vs.commissioner of Customs (Import & General)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~35 and 36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSTOM A. 1/2018 Date of decision:24. h April, 2018 ASHOK GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Madhumita Bhattachargee and Mr. Atanusaikia, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. ..... Respondent CUSTOM A. 2/2018 SANJAY SACHDEVA & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Madhumita Bhattachargee and Mr. Atanusaikia, Advocates. vesus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA J.(ORAL) CUSTOM A. Nos. 1/2018 & 2/2018 Page 1 of 8 At the outset, counsel for the appellants states that the afore- stated appeals may be treated as appeals preferred by Ashok Gupta, Sanjay Sachdeva and Anuradha Di...
Sonali G. Badhe vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
#25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24.04.2018 LPA2242018 & CM No.16085/2018 (stay) SONALI G. BADHE ..... Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : Mr. Kunal Cheema and Mr. Apoorv Shukla, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM No.16084/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. LPA2242018 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 read with Clause 10 of the Letters Patent (as applicable to LPA No.224/2018 Page 1 of 5 the Delhi High Court) assails the impugned judgment and order dated 23rd February, 2018, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1754/2018, whereb...
Lalit Kumar vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~ * CORAM: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 4085/2018 LALIT KUMAR Through Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner impugns the decision taken by 1. the respondent in its meeting held on 08.04.2016, whereby the petitioners application for allotment of an alternate plot had been rejected.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners application had been rejected only on the ground of delay by holding that while the petitioner had received the compensation for the acquired land on 28.09.2004, he had submitted the application for allotment of an alternate plot only on 28.09.2005, which according to the respondent was beyond the prescribed time limit of one year. He further submits that being aggrieved by the said rejection, the petitioner made a representa...
Garima Thakur and Ors. Vs.lt. Governor Through: Chief Secretary Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4124/2018 & C.Ms. 16235-37/2018 GARIMA THAKUR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Mr. Tarun Kumar and Mr. Nikhil Patnaik, Advocates Versus LT. GOVERNOR THROUGH: CHIEF SECRETARY DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, Mr. N.K. Singh, Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.1 to 3-GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners claim that they are working as Guest Teachers for the last 3 to 7 years and they have right to seek regularization of their service in terms of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Bill, 2017. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that a concise and composite Representation will be filed on behalf of the petitioners to third respondent within a week. If such a Representation is received by third respondent, then it be considered and decided within four weeks by passing a speaking orde...
M/S Krypton Heights Builders & Infrastructure vs.m/s Sun Control Syste ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h April, 2018 + RFA7362016 & CM APPL. 27349/2017 M/S KRYPTON HEIGHTS BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Alok Tripathi, Advocate with Mr. (M:9810606397), person. Sanjeev Ummat sole proprietor (M:8800482088) in versus M/S SUN CONTROL SYSTEMS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hem C. Vashisht and Mr. Rahul Malik, Advocates with Mr. Ramesh Gupta (9811070178), one of the partners in person. (M:9811039867) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. A suit under Order XXXVII of CPC for recovery of Rs.10 Lakhs was filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) before the Court of learned Additional District Judge.2. The transaction related to supply of UPVC Windows by the Plaintiff to the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter Defendant). It is the case of the Plaintiff that there was an outstanding amount of Rs.11,24,435/- towards the supplies made and in order to discharge the said a...
Ajay Maken vs.government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
$~1, 4, 15, 17 & 18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h April, 2018 1 + W.P.(C) 1873/2018 & C.M.7782/2018 NAFISA BEGUM SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC) & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS 4 17 18 15 versus versus ........ Petitioner JANODAYA EKTA SAMITI (REGD.) GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. DWARKA SECTOR6VENDORS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10206/2017 + W.P.(C) 4818/2016, C.M.Nos.20093/2016 & 28458/2016 + W.P.(C) 8042/2016, C.M.Nos.33341/2016, 34847/2016, 45806/2016, + W.P.(C) 1711/2017 AJAY MAKEN COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. versus AJAY MAKEN GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI versus 36086/2016 & 38104/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) No.1873/2018 Page 1 of 5 Present: Mr.Rajat Malhotra and Ms.Veera Mehra, Advocates for the petitioner in item no.1. Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Adv. for SDMC/R-1 i...
Usha Johri vs.syndicate Bank & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + W.P.(C) 4066/2018, CM Nos.16015/2018, 16016/2018 Decided on:24. 04.2018 USHA JOHRI Through: Mr Rahat Bansal, Adv. along with ..... Appellant Versus appellant in person. SYNDICATE BANK & ANR Through: None. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"Allow the present writ petition and issue an a. appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Honble Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in Appeal No.356 of 2016 and order dated 27.06.2016 passed by the Honble Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Delhi in O.A. No.189 of 2011. 2. The facts as are necessary for the adjudication of the present writ petition are adumbrated hereinbelow:-"a. The respondent/Bank filed an OA No.189/2011 on 16.05.2011 before the learned Debt Rec...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »