Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Ghanshyam Dass and Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 53/2018 $~36 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA SHRI GHANSHYAM DASS AND ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira, versus Advocates with... Petitioners No.1 & 6 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 & 2 Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for Respondent/LAC/L & B Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Advocate for Respondent/DDA ORDER3004.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayer in the present petition reads as under: (a) issue an appropriate writ, order or directions, thereby declaring the entire acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of... Petitioners comprised in Khasra Nos.394/324/3(1-16), 395/326/3(2-10) & 267 (0-19), totally measuring 5 Bighas and 5 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Said-UI-Ajaib, Tehsil Mehrauli (now Hauz Khas), New Delhi, initiated vide notification dated 13.11.1959, bearing No.F.15(111)/59-LSG, issue...
Mukul Agarwal vs.bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 27, 2018 + + W.P.(C) 4303/2018 W.P.(C) 4368/2018 MUKUL AGARWAL SH. NAVEEN KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. NEW DELHI Through: Mr. A.K. Roy, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above-captioned first petition, petitioner-Mukul Agarwal has resigned as Manager (Finance) from Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as BHEL) and his resignation was accepted by the Competent Authority w.e.f. 28th March, 2015. It is so evident from respondents Communication of 28th March, 2015 (Annexure P-5 colly.).2. In the above-captioned second petition, petitioner-Naveen Kumar Gupta had resigned as DGM (Finance) from BHEL on 17th October, 2015 and his resignation was accepted w.e.f. aforesaid date by respondent- BHEL vide Communication of 30th October, 2015 (Annexure P-10). Both petitioners had sought transf...
Mohd. Raees & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : January 09th, 2018 Date of Decision : April 27th, 2018 CRL.A. 1158/2016 MOHD. RAEES & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.V.P.Singh Bidhuri, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S. TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants, namely, Mohd. Raees and Mohd. Anees under Section 374(2) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 20.09.2016 and order on sentence dated 23.09.2016 passed by learned ASJ-05 (West) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default of fine to further undergo SI for one month each for the offence under Section 3IPC; and also to Crl.A.1158/2016 Page 1of 21 undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs...
Narender Sharma & Ors vs.pawan Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
$~13 * % + MAC.APP. 226/2012 versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h April, 2018 NARENDER SHARMA & ORS Through Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ..... Appellants PAWAN KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award dated 19th November, 2011 of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.4,03,200/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The accident dated 26th February, 2007 resulted in the death of Amber Sharma. The deceased was aged 27 years at the time of the accident and was working with Ms/ Perfect Planet Enterprise earning Rs.15,000/- per month.3. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of unskilled worker of Rs.3,470/- as the income of the deceased, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted towards personal expenses and applied the multiplier o...
Arun Kumar vs.airport Authority of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 27, 2018 W.P.(C) 4354/2018 & CMs.16866-67/2018 ARUN KUMAR Through: Mr. Vimal Dubey and Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dig Vijay Rai and Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief claimed in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-3), though dated 31st March, 2018, was made by petitioner on 2nd April, 2018, as claimed by petitioners counsel. The grievance of petitioner is that when he had requested the concerned staff to show the record of his timing of 100 meters race, he was bluntly told that no such display or record was maintained. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the fate of Representation (Annexure P-3) is not yet known.2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 ...
Ravi Kiran Katha and Anr. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h April, 2018 + W.P (C) 4321/2018 & CM Nos.16790-16791/2018 RAVI KIRAN KATHA AND ANR. Through: Mr.Gaurav Varma, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Suparna Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. At the oral request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad, 2nd Floor, Corporate Bhavan, GSI Post, Thatti Annaram, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad, Telangana-500068 is impleaded as Respondent No.2.2. 3. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning a list of disqualified directors to the extent that it includes the names of both the petitioners. The petitioners claim that M/s Callosmart Solutions Private Limited was incorporated on 22nd June, 2007, of which both the petitioners were directors. He, however, submits that the said company could not carry out business a...
Shubh Impex vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.138/2018 and CM No.593/2018 Date of decision:27. h April, 2018 SHUBH IMPEX ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Anjali J.Manish and Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai Advocate for Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner M/s Shubh Impex, sole proprietorship of Manish Sobti, had imported hooks and eyes fastening strips, the total value of which as per Bill of Entry dated 29th September, 2017 was Rs.13,28,470.20.2. The value of the consignment is not disputed by the respondents.3. The petitioner states that the imported goods fall under Custom Tariff Heading (CTH) 83081010 and accordingly customs duty of W.P. (C) 138/2018 Page 1 of 4 Rs.3,70,008/- would be payable.4...
Sh. Naveen Kumar Gupta vs.bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 27, 2018 + + W.P.(C) 4303/2018 W.P.(C) 4368/2018 MUKUL AGARWAL SH. NAVEEN KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. NEW DELHI Through: Mr. A.K. Roy, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above-captioned first petition, petitioner-Mukul Agarwal has resigned as Manager (Finance) from Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as BHEL) and his resignation was accepted by the Competent Authority w.e.f. 28th March, 2015. It is so evident from respondents Communication of 28th March, 2015 (Annexure P-5 colly.).2. In the above-captioned second petition, petitioner-Naveen Kumar Gupta had resigned as DGM (Finance) from BHEL on 17th October, 2015 and his resignation was accepted w.e.f. aforesaid date by respondent- BHEL vide Communication of 30th October, 2015 (Annexure P-10). Both petitioners had sought transf...
Sukhdev Singh vs.sheetal Suri & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 2/2018 % Date of decision :27. h April, 2018 SUKHDEV SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr. S.P. Kalra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Thukral, Adv. versus SHEETAL SURI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 10th October, 2017 passed by the ld. Single Judge in CS(OS)No.2092/2010.2. The appellant Sukhdev Singh before us was the defendant no.1 in the suit while the suit was filed by Sheetal Suri - respondent no.1 herein. The respondent no.2 - Raghubir Singh was defendant no.2 in the suit. The plaintiff and the defendant no.1 are siblings while the FAO(OS)No.2/2018 Page 1 of 4 defendant no.2 is their fathers brother i.e. paternal uncle.3. It is to be noted that the defendant no.1 (appellant herein) has filed counter claim which has been ...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.harbhajani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h April, 2018 $~15 * % + MAC.APP. 353/2017 & CM136532017 HARBHAJANI & ORS versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Nagender Deswal, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2. Mr.Lavkush Agnihotri, Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocates for respondents no.5 along with respondent no.5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.31,30,612/- has been awarded to respondents no.1, 2 and 5.2. The accident dated 8th December, 2009 resulted in the death of Praveen Kumar. The deceased was aged 24 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow and parents. The deceased was a contractual employee with NDMC. The deceased was working as Clerical Assistant with NDMC on contractual basis and was earning Rs.87,660/- per annum. MAC. APP. 353/2017 Pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »