Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pratyush Narnawre vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1993/2018 & CM No.8202/2018 PRATYUSH NARNAWRE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Lal Singh Thakur, Mr.Sudhir Tewatia, Mr.R.K. Solanki & Mr.Prabhas, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 & 2. + W.P.(C) 1994/2018& CM No.8204/2018 ALISHA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Lal Singh Thakur, Mr.Sudhir Tewatia, Mr.R.K. Solanki & Mr.Prabhas, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 & 2. + W.P.(C) 1995/2018& CM No.8206/2018 PARTH SALUJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Lal Singh Thakur, Mr.Sudhir Tewatia, Mr.R.K. Solanki & Mr.Prabhas, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus W.P.(C) 1993/2018 & conn. Page 1 of 9 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 & 2. + W.P...
Lancers Convent Senior Secondary School vs.jai Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t March, 2018 $~ * % + W.P.(C) 6279/2011 1. LANCER'S CONVENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus JAI PRAKASH Through: Mr. C.S. Parasher, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award dated 26th May, 2011 whereby the Labour Court has awarded reinstatement with full back wages to the respondent.2. The petitioner is a recognized private un-aided senior secondary school in which the respondent was working as a driver for a school bus. The respondent remained absent from duty without leave from 15th February, 2007 to 26th February, 2007. On 27th February, 2007, the respondent reported for duty when he was asked by the school to submit the medical fitness certificate to drive the school bus. W.P.(C) 6279/2011 Page 1 of 19 3. On 28th February, 2007, the respondent submitted a letter dated 28th February, 2007 in which he...
Institute of Home Economics vs.sh. Prem Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:4. h December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on:1. t March, 2018 W.P.(C) 8502/2011 & CM No.5502/2015 INSTITUTE OF HOME ECONOMICS Through Ms.Beenashaw N. Soni, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus SH. PREM PAL Through Mr.Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Respondent AND W.P.(C) 440/2014 Through Mr.Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus PREM PAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR INSTITUTE OF HOME ECONOMICS Through Ms.Beenashaw N. Soni, Advocate ..... Respondent CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner, i.e. Institute of Home Economics in W.P.(C) No.8502/2011 (hereinafter referred to as petitioner/Management) and the petitioner, i.e. Prem Pal in W.P.(C) No.440/2014 (hereinafter referred to as respondent/workman) have filed the petitions under Article 226 of the WP(C) Nos.8502/2011 & 440/2014 Page 1 of 41 Constitution of India, seeking quashing of the impugned Award dated 07.05.2011 passed by the Presiding Of...
Sorrel Hospitality Pvt. Ltd vs.nakodar Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
$~10 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t March, 2018 O.M.P (I) (COMM) 546/2017 SORREL HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jeevesh Nagrath, Mr.Pratham Sharma and Mr.Chitvan Singhal, Advs. versus NAKODAR HOTELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vatsal Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner inter alia seeking the following reliefs: (a) pass an interim order of injunction thereby restraining the Respondent, its agents, employees, officers, Directors, etc. from using or permitting to be used or making any reference of the Sub-Licensed Mark in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, including but not limited for and from the Hotel or any part concerning the same, and from all displays, hoardings, stationery, listings, internet, promotional material, ad...
Rahul Yadav vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: March 01, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 1120/2017 & Crl.M.A. 6294/2017 (stay) RAHUL YADAV ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Tarun Chandiok, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel with Ms. Kamna Vohra ASC with ACP K.P. Singh, Sub-Div. Najafgarh, SHO Naresh Sangwan, PS Najafgarh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of FIR No.310/2015 under Sections 195A/5IPC registered at PS Najafgarh, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 herein.2. Contents of FIR No.310/2015 are as under: It is stated that I reside at the above-noted address along with my family. On 02.02.2015, FIR No.88/2015 was registered upon my complaint against Rahul S/o Shri Bhagatram who had threatened me either to withdraw my complaint or else he would kill me and my family. That on 16.04.2015, at around 9:45 PM, when I was at my residence a...
M/S Krbl Limited vs.m/s P K Overseas Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t March, 2018 CM(M) 444/2014 and CM APPL.7745/2014 (stay) M/S KRBL LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Veerendra Kumar Sinha, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Rahul Sharma, & Mr. V.K. Shukla, Advs. versus M/S P K OVERSEAS PVT LTD Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar Advocate with ..... Respondent Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) The petition at hand challenged the order dated 14.12.2014 of 1. the Additional District Judge (ADJ) on the file of suit (TM No.63/2011) which was instituted by the petitioner (plaintiff) to the extent thereby it was directed that the matter arising out of application under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) of the respondent (defendant) seeking a review of order dated 15.05.2013 would be considered after the issue framed by the impugned order on the question of territorial jurisdiction had be...
R. S. Misra vs.director, Press and Publicity Centre & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
$~30 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:01. 03.2018 R. S. MISRA + W.P.(C) 8086/2011 & CM No.1741/2014 DIRECTOR, PRESS AND PUBLICITY CENTRE & ORS. versus Through : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Adv. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kanishk Rana, Adv. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed against the communication dated 20.7.2011, addressed by the respondents to the petitioner herein. The petitioner, as it appears from the record, had sought permission to sue the Tanzania Government via its High Commission in India.2. The impugned communication of the respondents dealt with the petitioners application made via letters dated 12.7.2011/28.4.2011.3. A perusal of these letters would show that no case is made out which is sought to be argued before me, which, is that the petitioner has copyright in the book in respect of which he claims royalty and that the provis...
Kevin c.c. Wong vs.delhi University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. 03.2018 LPA8072017 KEVIN C.C. WONG ..... Appellant Through : Sh. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Arun Monga, Ms. Divya Sharma, Sh. Archit Upadhayay and Sh. S. Singh Paul, Advocates. versus THE DELHI UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Mohinder. J.S. Rupal, Sh. Prang Newmai, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Sh. Abhishek Kumar, Ms. Sharmistha Ghosh and Sh. Mahipal Singh, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the decision of the learned Single Judge rejecting his writ petition; he challenged as unfair and arbitrary the selection and admission of the second respondent in the undergraduation programs of the Delhi University [hereafter referred to as the University - the first respondent in these proceedings]..2. The facts are few and not disputed. The appellant ...
Sanjeev Srivastava & Anr. Vs.idbi Trusteeship Services Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 91/2018 & IA No.2698-2699/2018 SANJEEV SRIVASTAVA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr Keshav Mohan, Mr Rishi K. Awasthi and Ms Ritu Arora, Advocates. IDBI TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES LIMITED & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocate with Ms Ranjana Roy Gawai, Ms Vasudha Sen and Mr Arjun Asthana, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0103.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 34 1. of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying for setting aside the arbitral award dated 23.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that had arisen in respect of the Personal Guarantees issued by the petitioners for due repayment of loans availed by Assotech Limited (hereafter As...
Akshay Chadha vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t March, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 334/2018 Represented by: Mr. Ravi Bassi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner AKSHAY CHADHA STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel and Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with DCP Vijay Kumar, West District, Inspector Keshav Mathur and SI Manoj Kumar, PS Rajouri Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.690/2017 under Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (in short JJ Act) registered at PS Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.2. The above noted FIR was registered when two Children in Conflict with Law (CCLs) were produced before the Juvenile Justice Board and stated that despite being juvenile they were being permitted smoking hukka at Keeva West Gate Mall. A raid was conducted at the premises and on inspection two hukkas ...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »