Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suraj Bhan vs.asha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~4 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 954/2015 Decided on:5. h March, 2018 + SURAJ BHAN ........ Petitioner ASHA Through: Mr. Deepak Sharma & Mr. Manish, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Jai Bansal, Advocate ..... Respondent RC.REV. 39/2018 & CM No.4377/2018 ASHA SURAJ BHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Bansal, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Deepak Sharma & Mr. ..... Respondent Manish, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both these petitions arise out of the proceedings relating to the eviction case (E No.68/2014 new ARC258672016) registered on the application of Suraj Bhan (landlord) who is petitioner in CM (M) CM (M) 954/2015 & conn. Page 1 of 6 954/2015 and respondent in RC Rev.39/2018 seeking an order of eviction on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 which is governed by the special procedure envisaged in Section 25 B of the said enactment, such proceedings being directed agains...
Rakesh Dhawan vs.om Prakash Dhawan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 03.2018 versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent % + RAKESH DHAWAN CRL.REV.P.105/2017 OM PRAKASH DHAWAN Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. R.C. Pathak, Advocate along with petitioner in person Mr. Jatin Rajput with Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0503.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P.105/2017 & CRL.M.A.1803/2017 (stay) & CRL.M.A. 1805/2017 (delay in filing for 41 days) 1. The petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 17.10.2016 passed by the Family Court under Section 125 Cr.P.C. awarding maintenance of Rs.1500/- per month to the respondent.2. Respondent is the father of the petitioner and aged 78 years. As per the respondent, he is receiving old age pension of Rs.1500/- per CRL.REV.P.105/2017 Page 1 of 4 month and is presently getting rent of approximately Rs.1265/- from the two shops in his possessi...
Abhishek Gupta vs.shree Salasar Polyflex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.628/2017 % ABHISHEK GUPTA5h March, 2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Mohit Kumar, Ms. Chetan Rai Wahi and Mr. Akshit Mago, Advocates. versus SHREE SALASAR POLYFLEX PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.13785/2017 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. CS(OS) No.628/2017 and I.A. No.13784/2017 (for stay) 2. This suit for declaration is filed by the plaintiff seeking the relief that the plaintiff be declared as a lawful joint owner of 9,95,000 shares as detailed in the prayer clause as also para 1 of the plaint. The 9,95,000 shares of which plaintiff claims declaration to be CS(OS) No.628/2017 Page 1 of 13 a lawful joint owner is of the defendant no.1 company. Plaintiff is seeking the relief of holding the plaintiff to be a lawful joint owner with ...
Rajesh Wadhwa vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~39 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:05. h March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 111/2017 RAJESH WADHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.N.S.Vasisht and Mr.M.P.Bhargava, Advts. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Kamaldeep, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated with respect to 1 bigha (1008 sq. yards) of agricultural land comprised in Khasra No.941/623 situated in revenue estate of Village Maidan Garhi, NCT of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have lapsed as neither physical possession has been taken nor compensation has been tendered to the W.P. (C) No...
Rahul Sahgal vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:5. 3.2018 + W.P.(C) 2027/2018 RAHUL SAHGAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Bisht, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rah, Mr. Siddharth Singh and Ms. Mahima Singh, Advocates. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.8389/2018 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2027/2018 & CM No.8388/2018 (Stay) 2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. W.P.(C) 2027/2018 Page 1 of4 4. Counsel for the petitioner says that issue raised in the present writ petition is similar to the issue which arose before the Division Bench in Prem Prakash Sethi and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.5. Copy of order dated 10.01.2018, passed in Prem Prakash Sethi and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr. has been placed before me. To be noted, the said order was pass...
Rohit Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 05, 2018 W.P.(C) 2000/2018 & C.M.8233/2018 ROHIT KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. CSS Tomar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) A mandamus is sought to third respondent to evaluate petitioners OMR Sheet and to appoint him on the post of Optical Worker if he has qualified. In pursuance of Advertisement (Annexure P-1) petitioner had applied for the post of Optical Worker and as per the List of Candidature Cancelled (Annexure P-6), petitioners Answer-sheet was not evaluated due to MISSING QP SERIES.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that it was due to inadvertence that the Question Paper Series was not mentioned by petitioner on his Answer-sheet and on account of this inadvertent error, petitioner ought not to suffer. To submit so, reliance is placed upon decision of a Division Bench of this Court in U...
Ashu Kumar vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~38 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2010/2018 & CM No.8283/2018 % Date of decision :5. h March, 2018 ASHU KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Amit Kumar and Ms. Varsha Rana, Advs. with petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC- GNCTD/R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition complains that the ARSS Mall located on Plot No.40, Community Centre, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-110063 has not complied with the requirements of the Delhi Fire Service Act, 2007 and Delhi Fire Service Rules, 2010.2. The writ petitioner has placed copy of an order No.Fb/DFS/MS/2016/Disc./10 dated 20th September, 2016 on record which has been passed by Sh. Mukesh Verma, Divisional Officer (West), Nominated Authority, Delhi Fire Services. W.P.(C)No.2010/2018 Page 1 of 3 By this order, the Delhi Fire Service has recorded its...
Jai Kishan Goel vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:5. h March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5396/2015 JAI KISHAN GOEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj with Mr.M. Tandon, Advocates. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms.Akshita Manocha and Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land measuring 5 bighas comprised in Khasra Nos.(2-4) and (2-16) situated in the revenue estate of village Kakrola, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement W.P.(C) 5396/2015 Page 1 of 4 Act...
M/S Engineers India Ltd. Vs.presiding Officer Labour Court
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:05. h March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 17858/2004 M/S ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Birbal, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Raavi Birbal and Mr.Govil Upadhyay, Mohit Daulatani and Mr. Maharshi Kaler, Advocates Mr. versus PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vimal Kumar Mehta, in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The name of Vimal Kumar Mehta - the respondent-workman before us - who was, theretofore, employed as Telex-cum-Teleprinter Operator with the petitioner, was struck off from the rolls of the petitioner, vide communication dated 11th October, 1991. This resulted in the raising, by the respondent, of an industrial dispute, which, vide order of reference dated 23rd September, 1994 was WP(C) 17858/2004 page 1 of 80 referred, by the Secretary (Labour), Government of NCT of Delhi, to the Labour Court for adjudication. Vide...
The Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School vs.the Directora ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : March 05, 2018 W.P.(C) 6155/2016 THE MANAGEMENT OF RUKAMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL Through: Dr. M Y Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner * % + Versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh K Tripathi, ASC, + GNCTD for respondent no.1 with Mr. R K Gambhir, DEO of R-1/Directorate of Education Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for Respondent -Bharti Sharma W.P.(C) 6156/2016 + THE MANAGEMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL Through: Dr. M Y Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh K Tripathi, ASC, GNCTD for respondent no.1 with Mr. R K Gambhir, DEO of R-1/Directorate of Education Mr. Ashok Aggarwal & Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates for Respondent no.2 W.P.(C) 6513/2016 THE MANAGEMENT OF RUKMANI DEVI W.P.(C) 6513/2016, 6155/2016 & 6156/2016 Page 1 of 9 JAIPURIA PUBLIC SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. M Y Kha...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »