Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subodh Dalal vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 15,2018 Judgment delivered on: March 05, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8507/2017 SUBODH DALAL Through: Mr. Mayank Mehandru and Ms. Charu Tandon, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. Through: Ms. Namrata Mukim, Adv. for NDMC with Mr. Yashpal, PHI, Keshowpuram, for R1/NDMC ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of order dated September 19, 2017 passed by Deputy Health Officer, North Delhi Municipal Corporation thereby rejecting the application of the petitioner dated December 19, 2016 for grant of Health Trade License and has directed for closure of the Spa of the petitioner situated at A215, Princess Road, Model Town I, Delhi.2. The facts leadings to the filing of the present petition are, the petitioner is running and operating the Spa in the name of Spa Life Wellness, w...
Mahendra Gupta and Anr vs.delhi Legislative Assembly Secretariat and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2032/2018 & CM No.8395/2018 MAHENDRA GUPTA AND ANR Through: Mr.Pardeep Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus DELHI LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT AND ORS Through: None for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Palak Rohmeta, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Stading Counsel of GNCTD Services for R-2 to R-5 Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-6 and R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER0503.2018 Representation for grant of upgraded grade pay and grant of non- % 1. functional selection grade (NFSG) has been remitted back by second respondent to first respondent on 22nd August 2017 with a direction to take action in terms of Services Department letter of 19th January, 2016 and circular dated 21st October, 2016 whose copies have been enclosed with the aforesaid Communication.2. The grievance of petitioners is that despite the aforesaid Communication of 22nd August, 2017, petitioners have not been granted the upgraded grade pay and non-...
Raj Kumar Garg vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2013/2018 and CM Nos.8285-86/2018.1. RAJ KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Varun Singh, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sarat Chandra, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER0503.2018 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying inter alia for directing the respondents/CRPF to permit him to join the Force on the post of SI (GD).2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents/CRPF had issued an advertisement on 28.03.2015, for conducting recruitment to the post of Sub-Inspectors in Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspectors in CISF Examination-2015. The petitioner applied for the post of SI (GD) in response to the aforesaid advertisement and participated in the written examinations as also the Physical Endurance Test (PET). The results were declared on 16.03.2016, wherein the petitioner's name feat...
Smt. Neeta Datta vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11818/2009 SMT. NEETA DATTA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Shruti Munjal and Ms.Akanksha Narang, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for R-1 with Mr.Ajay (Zone 1), DOE Mr.Sachin Jain, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % CM No.45800/2017 ORDER0503.2018 By way of this application, early hearing of the writ petition is sought. For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing is allowed and hearing of the writ petition is preponed for today. The application is allowed. W.P.(C) No.11818/2009 Against termination of her service, petitioner had approached the Delhi School Tribunal. Vide impugned order of 30th April, 2009, petitioner has been relegated to seek redressal under Industrial Disputes Act. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that petitioner would seek the redressal of her grievan...
Kamaluddin Khan vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 03.2018 BAIL APPLN. 919/2017 KAMALUDDIN KHAN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus Through STATE OF DELHI Through Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal with Ms. Prasanna and Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates. : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. SI Surekha, PS Malviya Nagar. JUDGMENT0503.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks bail in case FIR No.423/2016 under Section 354/376/506/363 IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of POSCO Act, Police Station Malviya Nagar.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner, on 22.03.2016, called the complainant, aged 17 years, to his house. The complainant is alleged to have gone to the house of the accused at 1 BAIL APPLN. 919/2017 Page 1 of 3 pm and thereafter the accused is alleged to have taken the complainant to a hotel at Gurgaon a...
Mobile Telesystems Ojsc and Anr. Vs.mr. Bhagat Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
14 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 371/2018 & I.As. 3872/2015 MOBILE TELESYSTEMS OJSC AND ANR. Through: Mr. Shantanu Sahay, Advocate with .....Plaintiffs Mr. Aasish Somasi, Advocate. versus MR. BHAGAT SINGH AND ANR. Through: ..... Defendants None. % Date of Decision:05. h March, 2018. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed against the defendants for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademarks, copyrights, passing off, dilution and tarnishment, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"43. In the light of the aforesaid, it is humbly prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to grant: a. An order injunction restraining for permanent the Defendants, their partners or proprietor, as the case may be, their principal officers, servants and agents, distributors, and all others acting on their behalf, from manufacturing, sel...
Bhawani Singh Rathore vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~30 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9355/2017 % Date of decision :5. h March, 2018 BHAWANI SINGH RATHORE ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Tushar Mathur, Adv. for Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC for UOI/R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petitioner appearing in person is a committed sports person, who has raised several issues in this writ petition relating to the jurisdiction of the respondents to bind themselves to the stipulations made by the World Anti-Doping Agency to compel Indian Sports Persons to undergo the tests prescribed by it. The petitioner also challenges the constitution of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, Geneva, Switzerland and its jurisdiction to bind Indian Sports Personnel by its decision.2. This writ petition has been filed without making any representation...
Rajinder Bali vs.sabh Infrastructure Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d January, 2018 Date of decision :5th March, 2018 + RFA3552017 & CMNo.13404/2017(stay) RAJINDER BALI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Leena Tuteja, Ms. Diksha Bhatia and Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advocates. (M:9910264203) versus SABH INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Mehrotra, Advocate with AR of the Respondent in person. (M:9811353874) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 A collaboration agreement was entered into on 30th April, 2012 between the Appellant/Mrs. Rajinder Bali (hereinafter owner) and the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter builder). The collaboration agreement was in respect of property bearing no.D-49 situated at Greater Kailash, Enclave-II, New Delhi measuring 408.33 sq. yds (hereinafter, suit property)..2. The relevant clauses of the Collaboration agreement are set out herein below: 1 2. That the Builder shall demolish the existing s...
Aksh Vardhan vs.karur Vysya Bank Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 05, 2017 W.P.(C) 2023/2018 & CM83832018 AKSH VARDHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubham Gupta and Ms. Prerna Gupta, Advocates versus KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD. AND ANR. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo ORDER (ORAL) The grievance of petitioner is that upon being relieved on 17th February, 2018, he has not been issued Experience Certificate despite his request (Annexure P-9) made to first respondent on that very day i.e. 17th February, 2018.2.... Petitioners counsel submits that petitioner upon his selection as Credit Officer in respondent No.2-Bank had to join on 31st August, 2017. Attention of this Court is drawn to email communication of 24th November, 2017 (Annexure P-7) [received by petitioner from second respondent]. to show that the time for joining has been extended till 1st March, 2018 and that the Experience Certificate is an essential pre- requisite to permit petitioner to ...
Goa Optolab p.ltd. Vs.naresh Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA1452007 & CM APPL. 419/2008 Date of Decision:5. h March, 2018 GOA OPTOLAB P.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sushant Kumar and Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocates. (M:8953712999) NARESH GUPTA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. M. Gupta, Advocate (M:9891363447) with Respondent in person. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.(Oral) Present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 1. 22nd December, 2006 by which the suit filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter Plaintiff) has been decreed for the sum of Rs.20,00,000/- along with pendente lite and future interest @ 9% per annum. Plaintiffs Case 2. Plaintiff is in the business of optical goods under the name of M/s. Naresh Optics at 214/2, Kandlekashan Street, Fatehpuri, Delhi. Shri Naresh Gupta is the proprietor of the firm M/s. Naresh Optics. It is the Plaintiffs case that the supplies were made by the Plaintiff to the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafte...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »