Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 06 2018

M/S Gulmehar Green Producer Company vs.commissioner Under Employees Co ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:06. 03.2018 W.P. (C) 2047/2018 M/S GULMEHAR GREEN PRODUCER COMPANY Through: Mr.Raveesh Thukral, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER UNDER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT (NORTH-EAST) LABOUR DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Through: Ms.Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CM No.8439-8440/2018 (exemptions) Exemptions allowed subject all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. W.P. (C) 2047/2018 & CM No.8438/2018 (for stay) 1.2. On an advance copy having been served, Ms.Jyoti Taneja, Advocate appears for respondent no.1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Articleof the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 01.08.2017 by which ex-parte Award was W.P (C) 2047/2018 Page 1 of 10 passed by Commissioner Employees Compensation (in brief CEC) against it granting Rs.7,13,086.08 as comp...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Kallu & Ors. Vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h March, 2018 Reserved on:21. t February, 2018 + ASLAM CRL.A. 336/2002 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Mohin Khan and Mr. S. Sagar, Advocates versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. + KALLU & ORS. STATE CRL.A. 393/2002 Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Mohin Khan and Mr. S. Sagar, Advocates ..Appellants versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State.... RESPONDENTCORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 15th April, 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.1registered at Police Station (PS) Nabi Karim convicting the four Appellants i.e. Aslam Crl. A. Nos. 336/2002 & 393/2002 Page 1 of 21 Accused No.1 (A-1'), Kallu (A-2), Shamim Ahmed (A-3) and Rafiq Ahmed (A-4) for the offence under Section 3Ind...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Mohit Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 18, 20 to 26 * + W.P.(C) 8318/2017 & CM No.34197/2017 (Directions) + W.P.(C) 9158/2017 & CM No.37461/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9160/2017 & CM No.37470/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9162/2017 & CM No.37477/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9171/2017 & CM No.37494/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9255/2017 & CM No.37805/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9256/2017 & CM No.37807/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9288/2017 & CM No.37967/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9360/2017 & CM No.38191/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9364/2017 & CM No.38198/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9425/2017 & CM No.38349/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9427/2017 & CM No.38351/2017 (Stay) SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV JITENDRA YADAV HITESH KUMAR YADAV SUBHASH CHAND CHARAN SINGH YADAV NAVEEN KUMAR YADAV MOHIT YADAV PARMENDAR KUMAR NITESH KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR RINKU AMIT YADAV ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.mamta Devi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h March, 2018 $~10 * % + MAC.APP.405/2017 & CM No.15718/2017 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv. versus MAMTA DEVI AND ORS Through: Mr. Samrendra K. Das, Adv. for respondent No.1 with respondent No.1 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.1,18,000/- has been awarded to her.2. On 21st December, 2013 at about 11:30 A.M., respondent No.1 was going to Rajan Babu Hospital, Kingsway Camp, Delhi along with her husband for his treatment when she was hit by car bearing No.DL-6CJ-9360 which resulted in the grievous injuries to respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 was taken to Nulife Hospital at GTB Nagar, Delhi where she was referred to Hindu Rao Hospital. Respondent No.1 was taken to Hindu Rao Hospital where her X-ray was done and left leg was plastered ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Hasnain Azim vs.afroz Abedin & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MARCH06 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 188/2018 & Crl.M.A.Nos.4200-4201/2018 HASNAIN AZIM ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Shekhar Gupta, Advocate. versus AFROZ ABEDIN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present Revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 30.01.2018 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.388/2017 whereby the orders dated 06.07.2017 and 13.09.2017 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate were upheld.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. Respondent No.1 had filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The petitioner along with his counsel put appearance in the said proceedings before the Trial court on 27.09.2016; it was adjourned to 17.11.2016. The matter was referred to Mediation; however it did no...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Pyari Rauthan vs.land Acquisition Collector / a.d.m. And Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~53 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:06. h March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7356/2016 PYARI RAUTHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pankaj Vivek, Ms.Manpreet, Mr.Anurag and Mr.Atul Tripathi, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR / A.D.M. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Advocate Tyagi, Ms.Jyoti respondent/LAC. Mr.Virender Pratap Singh Charak and Ms.Shubhra for respondent no.4/UOI. Parashar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. On 13.02.2018, when the matter was taken up for hearing, we were informed that the counter affidavit has been filed and on the basis of this statement the order was dictated. Subsequently, it was found that the counter affidavit of the LAC was not on record. Accordingly, the matter was listed today for directions.2. Ms.Joyti Tyagi, counsel for the LAC clarifies that in fact, the counter affidavit was filed on 28.08...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Mr Rajesh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

Through: Mr.James P.Thomas, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr.Harsh Pandit & Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Shahi, Advocates IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~3 * + W.P.(C) 509/2018 & CM No.2204/2018 (Stay) MR RAJESH KUMAR CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0603.2018 This order is in continuation of the order dated 13.02.2018, on % 1. which date, learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that his daughter has to undergo a spinal surgery at the AIIMS Hospital, Delhi and the petitioner had submitted an application to the respondents for release of money for his daughters implant, as prescribed by the attending doctor at the Hospital, which has yet to be released.2. In view of the aforesaid submission, directions were issued to the learned counsel for the respondents to check the status of the petitioners application.3. Today, Mr.Vivek Goyal, learned counsel for the r...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Charan Singh Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Amit Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Rajesh Dang and Anr vs.brij Mohan

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2018 FAO1652017 & CM APPL. 10805/2017 RAJESH DANG AND ANR Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. ..... Appellants Versus BRIJ MOHAN ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anubha Kaushal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) The appellants impugn an order dated 08.02.2017 awarding an amount of Rs. 1,27,711/- in favour of the respondent for the injury suffered by him during the course of employment. It is the respondents case that he used to work for the appellants at his power-press machine at monthly wages of Rs. 9,000/-. On 11.12.2014, while operating the said machine, suddenly its brakes malfunctioned due to which three fingers of his right hand were badly crushed leading to permanent disablement of 16%. The workman had sought compensation for 100% disability. The appellant had denied the employment of the workman. However, he admitted that the workman used to work for him on dail...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.