Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rohit @ Rahul vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 139/2015 Decided on:6. h March, 2018 Reserved on:12. h February, 2018 ROHIT @ RAHUL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam, Mr.Sachin Gautam, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP + AND CRL.A. 1541/2014 & Crl.M.A.6882/2017 SUNIL Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 22nd August, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge II (North- Crl.A. 139/2015 & 1541/2014 Page 1 of 34 West) (ASJ), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.85/2013 arising out of FIR No.278/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Adarsh Nagar convicting Rudramani @ Rukmani @ Guderia @ Rohit (Accused No.1 A-1') and both the Appellants Rohit Kumar @ Ra...
Sandeep Jain & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~42 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:6. 3.2018 W.P. (C) 2051/2018, CM APPL.8448-8449/2018 SANDEEP JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.8449/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 2051/2018, CM APPL.8448/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, who appears for respondents, accepts notice. 2.1 Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of W.P.(C) 2051/2018 Page 1 of 4 Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter ...
Amit Agarwal vs.religare Securities Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
+ % AMIT AGARWAL6h March, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Pinaki Addy, Advocate. Through: versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.980/2017 and C.M. No.42738/2017 (stay) RELIGARE SECURITIES LTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. When notice was issued in this RFA on 24.11.2017 the following order was passed:-"Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.Ms. stand disposed of. C.M. Appl. Nos. 42739-40/2017 (for exemptions) RFA No.980/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.42738/2017 (for stay) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant places reliance upon a judgment delivered by this Court in the case of IFCI Factors Limited Vs. Maven Industries Limited and Ors., 2015 (255) DLT32 to argue that the subject suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff could not have been instituted under Order 37 CPC, inasmuch as, the amount claimed in the suit is the amount claimed as a balance at the foot of an account a...
Jitendra Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 18, 20 to 26 * + W.P.(C) 8318/2017 & CM No.34197/2017 (Directions) + W.P.(C) 9158/2017 & CM No.37461/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9160/2017 & CM No.37470/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9162/2017 & CM No.37477/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9171/2017 & CM No.37494/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9255/2017 & CM No.37805/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9256/2017 & CM No.37807/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9288/2017 & CM No.37967/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9360/2017 & CM No.38191/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9364/2017 & CM No.38198/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9425/2017 & CM No.38349/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9427/2017 & CM No.38351/2017 (Stay) SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV JITENDRA YADAV HITESH KUMAR YADAV SUBHASH CHAND CHARAN SINGH YADAV NAVEEN KUMAR YADAV MOHIT YADAV PARMENDAR KUMAR NITESH KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR RINKU AMIT YADAV ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner .....
Nokia India Private Limited vs.additional Commissioner of Income Tax a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2974/2013 Reserved on :6. h November, 2017 Date of decision :6. h March, 2018 NOKIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Srivastava, Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Mr. Sumit Mangal & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advocates. Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. N.P. Sahani & Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Nokia India Private Limited has filed the afore-stated writ petition praying for multifarious reliefs, albeit during the course of arguments primarily one contention was raised and argued; assessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2009-10 have abated as time barred.2. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in manufacture and sale of telecommunication handsets.3. For the A...
Pushpender Kumar & Anr vs.indian Bank & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 06, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2076/2018 & CMs 8603-04/2018 PUSHPENDER KUMAR & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Dagar and Mr. Madhuvendra Jha, Advocates Versus INDIAN BANK & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) petitioners application seeking appointment on 1. First compassionate grounds stands rejected vide impugned order of 7th September, 2017 (Annexure-E). Similar application of first petitioner also stands rejected vide impugned order of 21st October, 2017 (Annexure-H). The rejection of first petitioners application for appointment on the post of Clerk on compassionate grounds is by Chief Manager (HRM) whereas as per the Scheme of Compassionate Appointment in Public Sector Banks (Annexure-A), the competent authority to make appointment on compassionate grounds ...
j.h.jewelers vs.umed Chindaliya & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h February, 2018 Pronounced on:06. h March, 2018 + CS(COMM) 180/2017 J.H.JEWELERS ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Manav Gupta, Ms.Esha Dutta and Mr.Sahil Garg, Advs. versus UMED CHINDALIYA & ORS Through Mr.Ateev Mathur, Adv. for D-4 ..... Defendant Mr.Dalip Mehra and Mr.Siddharth Yadav, Advs. for D-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.24903/2015 1. This application is moved on behalf of the defendant no.2 under Section 94 read with Section 151 of CPC seeking discharge from the order and/or modification/ clarification of the order dated 07.02.2014 passed by this Court. The said order is as follows: I.A. No.2387/2014 The abovementioned application has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 read with Section 151 CPC for CS (COMM) 180/2017 Page 1 of 8 attachment of the properties of defendants No.1 and 2. Issue notice to the defendants, returnable before the Joint Registrar on the date...
Vijay Pal @ Sittu vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2018 BAIL APPLN. 310/2018 VIJAY PAL @ SITTU versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Siddharth Pandit, Mr J.K.Sharma and Mr Atul Bansal For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr Akshai Malik, APP. SI Sandeep Yadav, PS Mehrauli. : % ORDER0603.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks interim bail in case FIR No.189/2014 under Sections 302/3IPC read with Section 25/of the Arms Act, PS Mehrauli, on the ground that his mother has to be operated for Gall Bladder stone.2. It is contended that the father of the petitioner is also suffering from severe heart ailment and there is blockage of 92% in his artery and he is not capable of looking after himself and even his wife is not keeping well. Surgery has been advised for 15.03.2018.3. Learned Counsel for the... Petitioner submits that ...
Ravinder Kumar vs.the Director General Indo Tibetan Border Police and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7319/2016 & CM No.30110/2016 (Stay) RAVINDER KUMAR Through: Mr.Vivek Sheel & Mr.Anshul Mahajan, Advocates versus ........ Petitioner THE DIRCTOR GENERAL INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE AND ANR Through: Mrs.Bharathi Raju, CGSC with Mr.Rohit Saroj, Adv. for R-1 & R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0603.2018 The petitioner, who is presently working on the post of a % 1. Constable (GD), has filed this petition praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside an order dated 07.02.2014 (wrongly typed as 07.12.2014 in Annexure-P1), passed by the respondent No.1/DG, ITBP, cancelling his promotion to the post of Head Constable (GD).2. A glance at the relevant facts of the case is necessary. In the year 2000, the petitioner had joined the respondent/ITBP in the cadre of Constable (Cook). On 03.04.2004, the petitioner was shifted from the cadre of Constable (Cook) to the Constable ...
Naveen Kumar Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 18, 20 to 26 * + W.P.(C) 8318/2017 & CM No.34197/2017 (Directions) + W.P.(C) 9158/2017 & CM No.37461/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9160/2017 & CM No.37470/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9162/2017 & CM No.37477/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9171/2017 & CM No.37494/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9255/2017 & CM No.37805/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9256/2017 & CM No.37807/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9288/2017 & CM No.37967/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9360/2017 & CM No.38191/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9364/2017 & CM No.38198/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9425/2017 & CM No.38349/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9427/2017 & CM No.38351/2017 (Stay) SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV JITENDRA YADAV HITESH KUMAR YADAV SUBHASH CHAND CHARAN SINGH YADAV NAVEEN KUMAR YADAV MOHIT YADAV PARMENDAR KUMAR NITESH KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR RINKU AMIT YADAV ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner .....
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »