Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 06 2018

Sandeep Kumar Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 18, 20 to 26 * + W.P.(C) 8318/2017 & CM No.34197/2017 (Directions) + W.P.(C) 9158/2017 & CM No.37461/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9160/2017 & CM No.37470/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9162/2017 & CM No.37477/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9171/2017 & CM No.37494/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9255/2017 & CM No.37805/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9256/2017 & CM No.37807/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9288/2017 & CM No.37967/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9360/2017 & CM No.38191/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9364/2017 & CM No.38198/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9425/2017 & CM No.38349/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9427/2017 & CM No.38351/2017 (Stay) SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV JITENDRA YADAV HITESH KUMAR YADAV SUBHASH CHAND CHARAN SINGH YADAV NAVEEN KUMAR YADAV MOHIT YADAV PARMENDAR KUMAR NITESH KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR RINKU AMIT YADAV ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Nitesh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Suresh Kumar Kaushik & Ors vs.government of Nct Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 2075/2018 & CM86022018 SURESH KUMAR KAUSHIK & ORS Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna and Ms. Anushruti, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 3-GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners are discharged Home-Guards who seek their absorption in suitable Group C and D posts in government departments by relaxing the recruitment rules and 50% reservation in Group C and D posts, as they claim to have specialized training in Disaster Management/Civil Defence. Although petitioners claim to have made various representations in the year 2016 and had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi to seek the relief as sought in this petition, but the Original Application filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi was withdrawn by petitioners due to lack of j...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Mahender Singh vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:6. March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10870/2016 MAHENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rahul Kadyan, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. Through Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC .Respondents for R-1 & 2. Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. for R-3. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition in which a direction is sought that respondent no.2/Child Welfare Committee should hand over the custody of Jyoti, Yuglesh and Jatin to the petitioner, i.e., their father.2. It appears that the petitioner and his wife, one, Ms. Sarita/respondent no.3 had a matrimonial dispute; resultantly, the children were put in custody of childrens home by the name Sweet Home pursuant to an order passed by respondent no.2/Child Welfare Committee. This order was passed by respondent no.2/Child Welfare Committee in the best interest of the children as according to its assessment they required ca...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Sunil vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 139/2015 Decided on:6. h March, 2018 Reserved on:12. h February, 2018 ROHIT @ RAHUL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam, Mr.Sachin Gautam, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP + AND CRL.A. 1541/2014 & Crl.M.A.6882/2017 SUNIL Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Prasanna, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 22nd August, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge II (North- Crl.A. 139/2015 & 1541/2014 Page 1 of 34 West) (ASJ), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.85/2013 arising out of FIR No.278/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Adarsh Nagar convicting Rudramani @ Rukmani @ Guderia @ Rohit (Accused No.1 A-1') and both the Appellants Rohit Kumar @ Ra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Bishnu Narayan Singh & Anr vs.union of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

$~60 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:06. 03.2018 + W.P.(C) 2003/2018 & CM Nos.8236-37/2018 BISHNU NARAYAN SINGH & ANR Through : Mr. Raj Rishi, ........ Petitioners Ms. Preeti Kumra and Mr. Nirbhey Kumar Pathak, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.8237/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2003/2018 & CM No.8236/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, who appears for respondents, accepts notice. 2.1 Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017, titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for W.P.(C) 2003/2018 Page 1 of 3 the respondents. Therefo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Sanjay Chauhan vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :29. h November, 2017 Date of decision :6. h March, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4965/2017 SANJAY CHAUHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sujit Gupta, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State with SI Naresh Kumar, PS Connaught Place. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Sanjay Chauhan assails the impugned order dated 28.02.2017 of the Court of the learned ASJ-02/FTC, Patiala House Court, New Delhi in Criminal Revision No.14 of 2017, which upheld the order dated 28.04.2016 of the Court of the learned MM-01, Patiala House Court, New Delhi in relation to the FIR No.192/08, registered at PS Connaught Place holding that a prima facie case was made out against the accused persons including the present petitioner qua the offences punishable under Sections 420/467/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, it having been held vide the impugne...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Subhash Chand vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Rinku vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2018

Brijpal vs.pgf Limited and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h March, 2018 CS(OS) 95/2018 & IA Nos. 3143-3145/2018 BRIJPAL ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. , Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Pandit, Mr. Atul Bansal, Advs. versus PGF LIMITED AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit (i) for specific performance of an ..... Defendants Through : None agreement to sell of property situated at A-52 (New number RZ D-92), which is part of Khasra No.78/24, admeasuring 500 sq. yds., in the locality Tej Ram Park, Nihal Vihar, Village Nagloi Jat, Delhi; and in the alternative, (ii) for the refund of earnest money with interest at 18% per annum; and, (iii) for permanent injunction restraining the two defendants i.e. PGF Limited and its director Mr. C. B. Dhillon from dealing with said property; and, (iv) for declaration of the plaintiff as owner of the property.2. The plaint is accompanied with IA31432018 under Section 5 of ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.