Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Upender Kumar Shastri & Ors vs.bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % 14 + MAC. APP. 376/2017 and C.M. Appl. 14647/2017 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Date of Decision:07. h March, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar and Mr. Vikas Bhadana, Advocates versus UPENDER KUMAR SHASTRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 4 15 + MAC. APP. 126/2018 UPENDER KUMAR SHASTRI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar and Mr. Vikas Bhadana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.30,05,000/- has been awarded to the appellants in MAC APP.126/2018. The appellant in MAC APP. 376/2017 is MAC.APP.376/2017, 126/2018 Page 1 of 6 seeking reduction of the compensation amount whereas the appellants in MAC APP.126/2018 are seeking enhancemen...
Aslam vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h March, 2018 Reserved on:21. t February, 2018 + ASLAM CRL.A. 336/2002 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Mohin Khan and Mr. S. Sagar, Advocates versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. + KALLU & ORS. STATE CRL.A. 393/2002 Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Mohin Khan and Mr. S. Sagar, Advocates ..Appellants versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State.... RESPONDENTCORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 15th April, 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.1registered at Police Station (PS) Nabi Karim convicting the four Appellants i.e. Aslam Crl. A. Nos. 336/2002 & 393/2002 Page 1 of 21 Accused No.1 (A-1'), Kallu (A-2), Shamim Ahmed (A-3) and Rafiq Ahmed (A-4) for the offence under Section 3Ind...
Harjeet Kathuria & Anr. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~48 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:6. 3.2018 W.P. (C) 2059/2018, CM APPL.8506-8507/2018 HARJEET KATHURIA & ANR. Through: Mr. Praveen K. Mittal, Advocate. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Singh with Ms. Annu Singh, Advocates for R-1 & 2. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.8507/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 2059/2018, CM APPL.8506/2018 (stay) 2. Issue notice. Mr. P.S. Singh who appears for respondents, accepts notice. 2.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit W.P.(C)2059/2018 Pag...
Dolby International Ab & Anr. Vs.das Telecom Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) No.1426/2016 + % DOLBY INTERNATIONAL AB & ANR. 6th March, 2018 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan, Mr. Rupin Bahl, Mr. Ujjwal Sinha, Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Mr. Saksham Garg, Mr. Devanshu Khanna and Ms. Karnika Kanwar, Advocates. versus DAS TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajgopal, Ms. Julien George, Mr. Yatinder Garg, Ms. Anu and Ms. Arundhati Gopal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A.No.12309/2017 (U/s 151 CPC) 1. This application is disposed of as not pressed as plaintiffs have filed their evidence and the subject documents as per the plaintiffs have been proved by the plaintiffs. CS(COMM) No.1426/2016 Page 1 of 14 I.A.No.1216/2018 (15A(M) & Order XI(7) &(10) r/w 151 CPC) 2. This application is disposed of without prejudice to the rights and ...
Hitesh Kumar Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 18, 20 to 26 * + W.P.(C) 8318/2017 & CM No.34197/2017 (Directions) + W.P.(C) 9158/2017 & CM No.37461/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9160/2017 & CM No.37470/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9162/2017 & CM No.37477/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9171/2017 & CM No.37494/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9255/2017 & CM No.37805/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9256/2017 & CM No.37807/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9288/2017 & CM No.37967/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9360/2017 & CM No.38191/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9364/2017 & CM No.38198/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9425/2017 & CM No.38349/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9427/2017 & CM No.38351/2017 (Stay) SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV JITENDRA YADAV HITESH KUMAR YADAV SUBHASH CHAND CHARAN SINGH YADAV NAVEEN KUMAR YADAV MOHIT YADAV PARMENDAR KUMAR NITESH KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR RINKU AMIT YADAV ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner .....
dr.navtej Singh vs.state of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. 10.2017 Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 725/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.3947/2017 DR. NAVTEJ SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Malhotra, Mr. Ranjeet Malhotra & Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocates along with petitioner - Dr.Navtej Singh, and Mr. Mohinder Singh - in person. versus STATE OF NCT & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS SI Surender Kr., PS Hari Nagar, for the State. Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Prianka Rao & Ms. Rytim Vohra, Advocates for and along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner herein has preferred the present writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus for production of his minor children, Ishnoor Kaur and Paramvir Singh, who are presently of ages five years and W.P.(CRL) 725/2017 Page 1 of 54 one year respectively. Ishnoor who was born in U.S.A on 27.08.2012 is a permanen...
Deepak Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 18, 20 to 26 * + W.P.(C) 8318/2017 & CM No.34197/2017 (Directions) + W.P.(C) 9158/2017 & CM No.37461/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9160/2017 & CM No.37470/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9162/2017 & CM No.37477/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9171/2017 & CM No.37494/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9255/2017 & CM No.37805/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9256/2017 & CM No.37807/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9288/2017 & CM No.37967/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9360/2017 & CM No.38191/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9364/2017 & CM No.38198/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9425/2017 & CM No.38349/2017 (Stay) + W.P.(C) 9427/2017 & CM No.38351/2017 (Stay) SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV JITENDRA YADAV HITESH KUMAR YADAV SUBHASH CHAND CHARAN SINGH YADAV NAVEEN KUMAR YADAV MOHIT YADAV PARMENDAR KUMAR NITESH KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR RINKU AMIT YADAV ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner .....
Manoj Gupta vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~41 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:6. 3.2018 W.P. (C) 2044/2018, CM APPL.8430-8431/2018 MANOJ GUPTA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC with Mr. Rohit Saroj, Advocates. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.8431/2018 (exemption) 1 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 2044/2018, CM APPL.8430/2018 (stay) 2. Issue notice. Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC who appears for respondents, accepts notice. 2.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of W.P.(C)2044/2018 Page 1 of 3 Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit wo...
Ranjit Kumar Gupta vs.chief Commissioner for Persons With Disabilities ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : March 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 2046/2018 & CM No.8435-37/2018 RANJIT KUMAR GUPTA Through: Ms.Surabhi Kumari, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES AND ANR Through: Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner had filed a complaint in September, 2016 in the Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disability asserting that petitioner was called for document verification on 12th August, 2016 and this call letter appeared on the official website of second respondent only on 12th August, 2016 and since petitioner was located in Delhi, he could not appear for document verification in Kolkata. Impugned order of 6th November, 2017 notes that prima facie there is violation on the part of respondent with reference to the rights of the complainant/petitioner who is a disabled person with 100% visual impairment. However, while relying upon ...
Ashok Nanda vs.mohinder Kumar Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ASHOK NANDA RFA No.225/2018 6th March, 2018 Through: Mr. Advocate. ..... Appellant Khetrapal, Sauyam versus MOHINDER KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.8433/2018 (delay in re-filing of 26 days) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.225/2018 & CM No.8432/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 27.9.2017 by which the trial court has while dismissing the suit for specific performance RFA No.225/2018 Page 1 of 8 granted relief of return of the amount of Rs.7,10,000/- paid along with interest at 18% per annum.2. The subject suit was filed by the appellant/plaintiff for specific performance of the agreement to sell wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »