Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mayur Seeds & Agritech vs.national Seeds Corporation Ltd (Nsc)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 548/2016 MAYUR SEEDS & AGRITECH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Ranu Purohit, Advocate and Mr Rishabh Gupta, Advocate versus NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD (NSC) Through: Mr Yashvardhan, Advocate with Mr Ankit Goyal, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0703.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 05.08.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of the sole arbitrator.2. The impugned award is rendered in the context of two agreements for supply of Soyabean seeds entered into between the parties.3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts that are necessary to address O.M.P. (COMM) 548/2016 Page 1 of 13 the controversy are as under:-"3.1 The respondent (hereafter NSC) issued a notice inviting tender (NIT) on 04.06.2011,...
Lakhan Singh @ Vicky vs.kaushal Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :7. h MARCH, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 189/2018 LAKHAN SINGH @ VICKY KAUSHAL KUMAR versus Through : Respondent in person. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Hamid Ali, Advocate along with petitioners wife in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.4226/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 189/2018 & CRL.M.B. 394/2018 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner Lakhan Singh @ Vicky to challenge the correctness of a judgment dated 06.02.2018 of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge in Crl.A.272/2017 whereby findings on conviction recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for commission of offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act were endorsed. The revision petition is not contested by the respondent. Crl.Rev.P.189/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The petitioner was convicted...
Vanshika Tarachandani and Anr. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:7. March, 2018 + W.P. (C) 2098/2018 VANSHIKA TARACHANDANI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Ms. Preeti Kumra and Mr. Raj Rishi, Advs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for UOI CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No.8687/2018 1. W.P. (C) 2098/2018 & CM No.8686/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Ajay Digpaul who appears for respondents accepts notice. W.P.(C) 2098/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017, titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter ...
Novex Communication Private Ltd. Vs.national Restaurant Association of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:07. MARCH, 2018 CS(COMM) 192/2017, IA No.3194/2017 (u/O XXXIX R- 1&2 CPC) & IA No.8323/2017 (u/S151r/W O-XII R-6 CPC) NOVEX COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LTD..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Versus NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Ajay Verma & Ms. Diviani Khanna, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Anip Sachthey, Ms. Anjali Chauhan & Ms. Ria Sachthey, Advs. for D-3. Mr. H.L. Rana, Adv. for D-4. Mr. Anuj Sharma, Adv. for D-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff, claiming to be an assignee, licensee or authorized agent of various copyright owners, has instituted this suit against defendant no.1 National Restaurant Association (NRA), an association of restaurants and against defendants no.2 to 5 viz. Essex Farms Pvt. Ltd., The Embassy Restaurant, Azure Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Kapco Banquet and Catering Pvt. Ltd., being a few of...
M/S. Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd. Vs.ministry of Coal, Govt. Of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:07. 03.2018 + M/S. VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LTD. R.A. No.102/2018 IN W.P.(C) 10614/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Ms. Aanchal Mullick and Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Advocates. MINISTRY OF COAL, GOVT. OF INDIA & ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Viplav, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Saeed Badri, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Advocate with Group Captain Karan Singh Bhati and Mr. Srehatosh Majumder, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) C.M. APPL. No.7040/2018 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. R.A. No.102/2018 & C.M. APPL. No.7039/2018 2. I have been called upon to deal with an interlocutory application and a review application. The interlocutory application has been filed by respondent no.2/ Coal Indi...
Kirti Kumar @ Nikhil vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h March, 2018 CRL.A. 612/2017 KIRTI KUMAR @ NIKHIL ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. C.M. Thapliyal, Mr. M.P. Shukla, Mr. S.P. Paul, Ms. Kiran Lata Pal, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP with SI Sanjeev Choudhary PS Vasant Kunj (S) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 9578/2017 Since this court has heard the appeal, application for suspension of sentence is dismissed as infructuous. CRL.A. 612/2017 1. By the present appeal the appellant challenges the judgment dated 18th March, 2017 convicting him for offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and the order on sentence directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of 50,000/- in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.2. The case of the prosecution is that at about 9.34 PM on 5th September, 2015 a PCR call was received th...
Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pte Ltd vs.sara International Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) 2/2017 SWISS SINGAPORE OVERSEAS ENTERPRISES PTE LTD Through: Mr S.N. Mitra and Ms Ekta Bhasin, Advocates. versus SARA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner .....Respondent Through: Mr Virender Ganda, Senior Advocate with Mr Vipul Ganda, Mr Raghav Kakkar and Ms Shreya Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0703.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 M/s Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Private Limited (hereafter SSOEPL), a company registered under the laws of Singapore has filed the present petition for enforcement of a foreign award dated 16.10.2016 (hereafter the arbitral award) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in respect of an arbitration conducted under the aegis of Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).2. The respondent (hereafter SARA), a company incorporated in India, has filed objections to the enforcement of the arbitral award under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Saxena vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~69 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:7. 3.2018 W.P.(C) 2057/2018, CM APPL.8471 & 8473/2018 MR. RAMESH KUMAR SAXENA Through: Mr. Pulkit Deora, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, who appears for respondents, accepts notice. 1.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit would serve no purpose as the stand of the respondents is the same as in Sandeep Singh & Anr. (supra). W.P.(C) No.2057 of 2018 Pg. 1 of 3 2. It is the case of the petitioner that...
Jag Ram vs.the Chief Executive Officer Bses Yamuna Power Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 07, 2018 JAG RAM W.P.(C) 2111/2018 Through: Nemo ........ Petitioner versus THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anupam Varma and Mr. Rahul, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) On the subject of revision of pension of petitioner, who had retired on 31st December, 2011 as Senior Manager in BSES, a Communication of 29th April, 2014 (Annexure P-4) was sent by the Deputy Manager (PT), DVB Employees Terminal Benefits Fund-2002 to release the revised pension to petitioner. According to petitioner, aforesaid Communication of 29th April, 2014 (Annexure P-4) was not given effect to by respondent- BSES, which led to filing of a Representation (Annexure P-1) by petitioner to respondent-BSES on 9th June, 2017. It is averred in this petition that there is no response to the said Representation (Annexure P- 1).2. In the facts and circu...
M/S Welcure Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs.fresenius Kabi Oncology Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2018
$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 215/2017 % Date of decision :7. h March, 2018 M/S WELCURE DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD Through : Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Adv. ..... Appellant versus FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saumya Gupta and Mr. Sudhanshu Suman, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 By way of the present appeal, filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, the appellant assails an order dated 31st January, 2017 whereby the ld. Single Judge held the arbitral proceedings itself to have been closed, without considering or passing an order on the objections filed by the respondent herein against an interim Arbitral Award dated 18th October, 2010.2. The primary ground of challenge is that by the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has not returned any finding that the interim award ...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »