Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P K Singh vs.national Insurance Company Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 2849/2018 & CM115522018 P K SINGH Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta and Mr. Rahul Sinha, Advocates .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for respondent No.1 .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Consequent upon a departmental inquiry, vide order of 10th November, 2015 (Annexure P-8), penalty of dismissal from service was inflicted upon petitioner, who was working as Assistant at Noida Division in respondent-National Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company). Against dismissal order (Annexure P-8), petitioner had filed a statutory appeal (Annexure P-9) on 12th January, 2016, which has been dismissed vide order (Annexure P-10) in April, 2016. Thereafter, against appellate order, petitioner had submitted a Memorial (Annexure P-11) on 15th September, 2016 to respondent-Company wherein it has ...
Felix Stefan Kaye vs.foreigners Regional Registration Office (Frro) De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~41 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:23. 03.2018 + W.P.(C) 2862/2018 & CM Nos.11574-576/2018 FELIX STEFAN KAYE ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arjun Mukherjee and Mr. Pradeep, Advs. versus FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICE (FRRO) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Mahima Bahl and Mr. Seerat Singh, Advs. Mr. Harwinder Singh, Inspector/OCI/CEIC, FRRO with Mr. Satwinder Singh, Inspector FRRO. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM Nos.11575-76/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2862/2018 & CM No.11574/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Akshay Makhija accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.3. In view of the order that I propose to pass, Mr. Makhija says that a counter affidavit may not be required. W.P.(C) 2862/2018 Page 1 of 4 4. The... Petitioner claims he married an Indian Citizen, one, Ms. Ritika Singh in 2009 and from wedlock ...
National Highways Authority of India. Vs.hindustan Construction Co. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Pronounced on:23. d March, 2018 FAO(OS) 192/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. Through : Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain and Mr. .... Appellant versus Mukesh Kumar, Advs. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD..... Respondent Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Malavika Ms. AakashiLodha and Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. Lal, FAO(OS) 195/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. Through : Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain and Mr. .... Appellant Mukesh Kumar, Advs. versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD...... Respondent Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Malavika Ms. AakashiLodha and Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. Lal, CORAM: HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR FAO(OS) 192/2017 & FAO(OS) 195/2017 Page 1 JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has, in FAO(OS) 192/2017 and FAO(OS) 195/2017,filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration ...
Naresh Yadav vs.union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.750/2018 % Reserved on:28. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 KAILASH GAHLOT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr. Manashwy Jha and Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocates. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Ayiala Imti and Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates for ECI. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, Ms. Rajul Jain with Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. Mr. Mudit Gupta and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates for R-4. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.751/2018 RAJESH RISHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr....
M/S. Pearey Lal and Sons (P) Ltd. Vs.ndmc and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 03.2018 Pronounced on:23. 03.2018 + W.P.(C) 2198/2017 SAURABH MALHOTRA AND ORS NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC) AND ORS. Versus ..... Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS versus M/S. PEAREY LAL AND SONS (P) LTD. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS And connected matters: + W.P.(C) 3995/2017 + W.P.(C) 4789/2017, C.M. APPL.20759/2017 M/S. MEHRA JEWEL PALACE PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS ..... Petitioner ..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. B.B. Jain, Mr. Amitabh Marwaha and Mr. Abhay Jain, Advocates, in W.P.(C) 188/2018, W.P.(C) 2198/2017 & W.P.(C) 3995/2017. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Ms. Diksha Mathur, Advocates, for petitioner, in W.P.(C) 4789/2017. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Kaskaran Kaur, Advocates, with Mr. Puneet Gupta, DEO and Mr. Hardeep Singh, Jr. Assistant, NDMC, in all matters. Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal and Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates, for UOI, in W.P.(C) 188/2018...
Ram Kawar Huf vs.m/s Smc Global Securities Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1494/2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 03.2018 RAM KAWAR HUF M/S SMC GLOBAL SECURITIES LTD. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : :... Petitioner in person. Mr. Prince Jain, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2303.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.5425/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1494/2018 & Crl.M.A.5426/2018 (stay) 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing today.2. The petitioner impugns order dated 14.12.2017, whereby, the Revisional Court has allowed the revision petition filed by the petitioner CRL.M.C. 1494/2018 Page 1 of 9 subject to certain conditions.3. The petitioner is an accused in a case filed by the respondent under Section 138 of Negotiab...
Neelam Sharma vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : March 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 5942/2017 & CM No.7443/2018 NEELAM SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Sharma, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC (GNCTD) with Mr.Shashank Tiwari, Advocate for DOE Mr.V.S.R.Krishna and Mr.V.Shashank Kumar, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of suspension order of 15th October, 2016 is sought by petitioner on the ground that there is no prior approval from respondent- Directorate of Education to suspend petitioner. It is brought to the notice of this Court that a charge sheet has been served upon petitioner on 30th December, 2016 to which petitioner has duly responded. It is matter of record that petitioner has retired on 30th October, 2017. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioners claim for grant of Assured Career Progression also survives.2. Upon hearing, thi...
Ht Media Limited & Anr vs.sandeep Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 284/2017 HT MEDIA LIMITED & ANR Through Ms. Julien George with ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Dhavish Chitkara, Advocates versus Through None SANDEEP SINGH & ORS % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ..... Defendants Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018. MANMOHAN, J (Oral): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, unfair business practice, rendition of accounts, damages, etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-""30. It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may please grant the following reliefs in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants: a) Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their Directors, principal Officers, Partners, Proprietors, financers, Domain keepers, Publishers, editors, employees, reporters, servants, agents and/or any one claiming under them from in any manner ...
Wx vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.999/2016 WX .....Appellant Reserved on:12. h March, 2018 Decided on:23. d March, 2018 Through: Mr. Ajay Verma with Ms Sudha Reddy and Ms Katyayni, Advocates. versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Ms Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20th May, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Fast Track Court, Shahdara District in Sessions Case No.2/2011 arising out of an FIR No.311/2010 registered at Police Station (PS) Madhu Vihar convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appeal is also directed against the impugned order on sentence dated 28th May, 2016 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo Crl.A. 999 /2016 Page 1 of 16 s...
Karti P Chidambram vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h MARCH, 2018 DECIDED ON :23. d MARCH, 2018 * + ........ Petitioner BAIL APPLN. 573/2018 KARTI P CHIDAMBRAM Through : Mr.Kapil Sibbal, Sr.Advocate; Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr.Advocate; Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, Sr.Advocate; Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate; Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Arshdeep Singh, Mr.Amit Bhandari, Mr.Prateek Chadha, Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Mr.Akshat Gupta, Mr.Aditya Chopra, Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri & Mr.Nikhil Bhalla, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION..... Respondent Through : Mr.Tushar Mehta, Sr.Advocate/ ASG with Mr.D.P.Singh, Ms.Sonam Gupta, Mr.Rajat Nair, Mr.Kanu Agrawal & Mr.Manu Mishra, Advocates. IO DSP R.Parthasarthy. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case RC2202017-E-0011 dated 15.05.2017 registered under Section 120B read with Section 420 IPC; Section 8 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of Preventio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »