Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Polo/Lauren Company L P vs.m/s Varsha & Co and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ 6 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 673/2016 THE POLO/LAUREN COMPANY L P ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocates. versus M/S VARSHA & CO AND ANR Through ..... Defendants Ex-Parte Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off, damages, delivery up, rendition of accounts etc. against the defendants. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"43. That under the facts and circumstances of the present case the Plaintiff most respectfully prays that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to: (a) Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant No.1 and 2 by themselves as also through their individual proprietors/partners/principles, agents, representatives, distributors, assigns, heirs, successors, stock...
Saurabh Malhotra and Ors. Vs.ndmc and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 03.2018 Pronounced on:23. 03.2018 + W.P.(C) 2198/2017 SAURABH MALHOTRA AND ORS NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC) AND ORS. Versus ..... Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS versus M/S. PEAREY LAL AND SONS (P) LTD. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS And connected matters: + W.P.(C) 3995/2017 + W.P.(C) 4789/2017, C.M. APPL.20759/2017 M/S. MEHRA JEWEL PALACE PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS ..... Petitioner ..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. B.B. Jain, Mr. Amitabh Marwaha and Mr. Abhay Jain, Advocates, in W.P.(C) 188/2018, W.P.(C) 2198/2017 & W.P.(C) 3995/2017. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Ms. Diksha Mathur, Advocates, for petitioner, in W.P.(C) 4789/2017. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Kaskaran Kaur, Advocates, with Mr. Puneet Gupta, DEO and Mr. Hardeep Singh, Jr. Assistant, NDMC, in all matters. Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal and Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates, for UOI, in W.P.(C) 188/2018...
Anil Kumar vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
Judgment delivered on:23. 03.2018 BAIL APPLN. 584/2018 $~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ANIL KUMAR STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Man Tripathi, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Vinay Tyagi CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2303.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.64/2008 under Section 302 registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi.2. The allegations made in the FIR are that the daughter of the complainant who was aged 7 years of age had been murdered by someone.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner BAIL APPLN. 584/2018 Page 1 of 3 has been falsely implicated. He submits that the petitioner has been implicated solely on the basis of theory of last scene. However, the evidence does not support the theory of the last scene....
Dinesh Singh Rawat vs.chairman, Ryan International School and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 8294/2017 & CM428912017 DINESH SINGH RAWAT Through: Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate .....Petitioner versus CHAIRMAN, RYAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Romy Chako and Mr.Chandan Kumar, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocates for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the first round of litigation, consequent upon a departmental inquiry, penalty of dismissal was inflicted upon petitioner which he had challenged by way of an appeal before Delhi School Tribunal. Vide order of 17th October, 2016, the Delhi School Tribunal had set aside the penalty imposed upon petitioner and directed his reinstatement within four weeks. The said order was challenged by respondent herein by way of a writ petition which stood allowed vide order of 16th May, 2017 (Annexure P-2). The order (Annexure P-1) of Delhi School Tribun...
Hitachi Payment Services pvt.ltd. Vs.state and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : MARCH23 2018 W.P.(Crl.)870/2018 & Crl.M.A.5444/2018 HITACHI PAYMENT SERVICES PVT.LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : versus STATE AND ORS. ..... RespondentS Through : Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC with Mr.Premsagar Pal and Ms.Suman Saharan, Advocates. SI Ranvir Singh, PS Burari. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of FIR No.664/2014 under Section 304-A IPC registered at Police Station Burari. Status report is taken on record.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the matter has been settled with the legal heirs of the deceased. No useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial court. `6.5 lacs has been agreed to be paid to the legal heirs of the deceased and they have no objection to the quashing of the FIR. Reliance is placed on Smt.Anita Maria...
State of Nct of Delhi vs.dharmender
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5. * + % CRL.A. 1184/2017 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Date of Decision:23. 03.2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. versus DHARMENDER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sherawat and Mr. Shashidhar Mishra, Advocates along with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The State has preferred the present appeal upon grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 24.03.2017 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01-cum-Presiding Officer [Special Court designated under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act)]., District South-East, New Delhi in Case No.1806/16, Sessions Case No.194/2013 arising out of FIR No.351/2013 registered at Police Station Kalkaji under Sections 377 IPC and Sections 3 & 6 of the POCSO Act.2. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has acquitted the respondent accused on the premis...
Dinesh Kumar Sharma vs.sudhir Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.287/2018 + % DINESH KUMAR SHARMA Reserved on:21. t March, 2018 Pronounced on:23. rd March, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. versus ........ RESPONDENTS SUDHIR KUMAR & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. No.11195/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.287/2018 2. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 15.4.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for partition and injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff. The suit properties are the properties RFA No.287/2018 Page 1 of 7 situated on a plot of 3660 sq. yards in Khasra No.146 of village Burari, Delhi and a plot of 220 sq. yards in the same village. Appellant/plaintiff claims to be the adopted son of ...
Sanjeev Jha vs.union of India, Ministry of Law & Justice & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.750/2018 % Reserved on:28. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 KAILASH GAHLOT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr. Manashwy Jha and Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocates. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Ayiala Imti and Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates for ECI. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, Ms. Rajul Jain with Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. Mr. Mudit Gupta and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates for R-4. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.751/2018 RAJESH RISHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr....
Union of India vs.national Project Construction Corp. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:06. h February, 2018 Pronounced on:23. h March, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 35/2018 and IA Nos.1200, 1202, 1203/2018 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.N Prashant Kumar Nair, Advocate. versus NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORP. LTD. Through : Mr.Sanjoy Bhaumik, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition is under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 challenging the award dated 11.05.2015. The brief facts as alleged by the petitioner are : a) "Balance work of construction of 10 Nos. Major Bridges on Broad Gauge Railway Line across river of spans 9.15 Meter, 12.20 Meter and 30.50 Meter of PSC Girders on well foundations/open foundations with RCC abutments, Piers and other allied works like protection works from KM72400 to 113.750 in between Chakki Bank and Mukerian (including yards) in connection with doubling on Jalandhar Cant.- O.M.P. (COMM.) 35/...
Rajan Goel vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~25(management dispute matter) *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10298/2017 and CM No.42013/2017 % Date of decision :23. d March, 2018 RAJAN GOEL Through : Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Ms. ........ Petitioner Charu Tyagi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC along with Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who was a Director in M/s Royal Hindustan Ltd., a company incorporated and registered under the provisions of the Companies Act.2. Apart from this company, the petitioner is stated to be a Director in other companies as well.3. The writ petition has been instituted in view of the notice dated 6th September, 2017 and 12th September, 2017 issued under Section W.P.(C)No.10298/2017 Page 1 of 3 164(2)(a) of the Compan...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »