Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Singh and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:20. h March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2387/2016 & C.M.10226/2016 JAI SINGH AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Mr.Harpreet Singh & Mr.Mool Chand Verma, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Ms.Shubhra Parashar & Dr. G.L. Bhatia, Advs. for UOI/respondents no.1 and 2. Mr.Sachin Nawani, Advocate for R-4 & R-5. Ms.Renuka Arora, Adv. for DSIIDC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to their respective lands, are deemed to have lapsed as actual physical possession of the land has not been taken.2. The petitioners claim to be the co-owners of land bearing Khasra No.80//16/1, 16/2, 17, 18, 23, 24, 25 in the revenue estate of Village Sultanpur Dabas, Delhi. The resp...
Neeraj Mishra vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1004/2017 Reserved on:7. h March, 2018 Decided on:20. h March, 2018 ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anand Shankar, Advocate for Mr. Bipin Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State. NEERAJ MISHRA CRL.A. 1107/2017 ...Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate(DHCLSC). versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment dated 3rd August 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions JudgeI (North- East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.44875/2015 arising out of FIR No.182/2010 registered at Police Station (PS) New Usmanpur convicting Abhay Kumar Mishra (Appellant in Crl.A.No.1004/2017) Crl.A.1004/2017 & Crl.A.1107/2017 Page 1 of 20 (Accused No.3: A-3)...
Ernst and Young Private Limited vs.ministry of Youth Affairs and Sport ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) 71/2018 Reserved on:13. h February, 2018 Date of decision:20. h March, 2018 ERNST AND YOUNG PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Thakur, Mr.R.K.Mishra, Mr.Rishi Raj, Ms.Kavita Singh, Advs. versus MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Neeraj Choudhary, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11th December, 2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal allowing the claims of the respondent no.1.2. The Organizing Committee Common Wealth Games 2010 (OC CWG), was a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and was entrusted by the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) to organize the Common Wealth Games, 2010 in the National Capital Region of Delhi. OC CWG stand...
Ashish Kumar Verma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * + W.P.(C) 974/2018 with CM Nos.4142-4143/2018 ASHISH KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Surya Nath Pandey, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI with Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocate with Lt.Col.(Dr.) Ashok Kumar, Cl. Spl. (Ophthal) & VR Surgean Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Devik Singh & Mr.Akash Mohapatra, Advocates for R-2 & R-3/UPSC CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER2003.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by his non selection in the National % 1. Defence Academy and Naval Academy Examination (1) -2017 for NDA-139 Course and has prayed for issuance of a writ/directions to the respondents to constitute a Review Medial Board to re-examine him. W.P.(C) 974/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. The brief facts of the case are that in January, 2017, the respondent No.2/UPSC had published an Examination Notice for conducting examinations for admission to the Army, Na...
Dharampal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~83 and 84 * % + W.P.(C) 2608/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:20. h March, 2018 CHATAR SINGH AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 2695/2016 DHARAMPAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Mr.Harpreet Singh & Mr.Mool Chand Verma, Advocates for the petitioners in both the matters. Ms.Shubhra Parashar and Dr.G.L.Bhatia, Advocates for UOI/respondents no.1 and 2. Ms.Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for the LAC/L&B department in Item No.83. Mr.R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the LAC/L&B department in Item No.84. Ms.Renuka Arora, Adv. for DSIIDC in both the matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Since both the writ petitions raise a common question of law, for the sake of convenience a common judgment is being rendered although both the petitions have been heard separately.2. These are pet...
Mehjabin Kousar vs.director of Education & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order: March 19, 2018 W.P.(C) 4686/2017 MEHJABIN KOUSAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashok Agarwal, Advocate versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC (GNCTD) and Mr.Shahsank S.Tiwari, Advocate Mr.Rajiv Mishra and Ms.Shruti Sharma, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner claims to be suspended on 9th September, 2016 vide order (Annexure P-2) and had sought payment of subsistence allowance vide letters (Annexure P-3 Colly) in January, February, March and May, 2017. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that neither any response to the said letters was received by petitioner nor subsistence allowance was paid to her. By way of this writ petition, revocation of the suspension order of 9th September, 2016 (Annexure P-2) is sought with direction to respondent-school to pay full salary for the period of suspension. As per W.P.(C) No....
Dharmender & Anr vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DHARMENDER & ANR CRL.A. 888/2016... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr. Y.P. Sirohi along with Ms. versus Neha, Advocates STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. .... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER1903.2018 % 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 22nd July 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (South-West)-02 Dwarka Courts, Delhi (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.61 of 2015 arising out of the FIR No.13 of 2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Najafgarh convicting the two Appellants i.e. Dharmender [Accused No.1 (A-1)]. and Jitender [Accused No.2 (A-2)]. for the offence punishable under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 29th July 2016 whereby for the offence under Section 3IPC each of the Appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.20,000/- each; and in default of payment of fine, to undergo ...
p.p. Sharma vs.honble the Chief Justice of Delhi, Delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2018
Date of Decision:19. 03.2018 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 206/1988 Through: None. P.P. SHARMA versus ........ Petitioner HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF DELHI, DELHI HIGH COURT Through: Mr. K.K. Bhuchar, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. In these writ proceedings despite repeated adjournments since 1988, the most recent ones in the year 2018 being on 03.01.2018, 04.01.2018, 01.03.2018, 05.03.2018, 08.03.2018, 09.03.2018, 12.03.2018, 13.03.2018 and 14.03.2018, the counsel for the legal representatives of the petitioner have not appeared and assisted the Court.2. The petitioner Shri P.P. Sharma challenges his dismissal from service, by the impugned order of 03.07.1987.3.... Petitioner joined the Rajasthan Judicial Services in 1961 and was later inducted to Delhi Judicial Services in 1971. He was constituted as a Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicles Accident Claims W.P.(C) 20...
Springdales Education Society vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h March, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4943/2015 & CM No.8939/2015 SPRINGDALES EDUCATION SOCIETY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil K. Kher, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kher and Ms. Namita Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Vikram ........ RESPONDENTS for Jetley, CGSC respondent no.1/ UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Ms. Ms.Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates for DDA. Relan Gupta Dhanesh Kajri and and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner forming part of Khasra Nos. 1817 (416), 1818 (2 14), 1819 (4-6), 1820 (1-2), 1821 (4-16), 1822 (3-18), 1823 (2-1), 1832 (3-18), 1835 (4-16) and 1836 (4-16), totally...
Sqn Ldr Rajashree Abhiraman vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2018
$~21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2564/2018 1. SQN LDR RAJASHREE ABHIRAMAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Kakkar and Ms.Sampanna Pani, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Ms. Rabiya Singh and Ms. Shalini Nair, Advocates. Wg. Cdr. Ashish Tripathi and Wg. Cdr. N. Kishore CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER1903.2018 The present petition has been filed the petitioner praying inter alia for grant of co-location posting and last leg posting to her alongwith her husband at any unit in Delhi NCR; alternatively, the petitioner seeks premature retirement from service with the respondents No.2 to 4/Indian Air Force.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was commissioned in the Indian Air Force on 13.07.2009, as an Aeronautical Engineer (Electrical). Between 22.04.2011 to 13.09.2015, the petitioner remained posted at Arjangarh, New Delhi. In th...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »