Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Urmil Modi vs.angel Commodities Broking Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) 91/2017 Reserved on:18. h January, 2018 URMIL MODI Date of decision:20. h March, 2018 Through: Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with versus Mr. R.K. Modi, Advocate ........ Petitioner ANGEL COMMODITIES BROKING PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Tomar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated May, 2013 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in Arbitration Case No.MCX/Legal/913A/12.2. The petitioner claims that she had been dealing with M/s Angel Broking Private Limited, an associate company of the respondent since the year 2007. She submits that the said dealings were confined to the sale and purchase of shares against cash payments alone.3. The petitioner entered into a relation with the respondent herein by executing Client Registration Form, ...
The New India Assurance Company Limited vs.chaitanya Kumar Bhardwaj & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~1 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 20, 2018 MAC.APP. 718/2015 & CM No.19672/2015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Awantika Manohar, Advocate versus CHAITANYA KUMAR BHARDWAJ & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Lokesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Himanshu Sharma, Advocates for R-1 + MAC.APP. 132/2018 CHAITANYA KUMAR BHARDWAJ ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Lokesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Himanshu Sharma, Advocates versus ABHISHEK SINGH AND ORS (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate and Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocate for R-2 Ms.Awantika Manohar, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Mac.A.Nos. 718/2015 & 132/2018 Page 1 of 7 1. Impugned Award of 8th July, 2015 grants compensation of `34,19,342/- with interest @ 9% to Chaitanya Kumar Bhardwaj on account of the injuries sustained by him in a vehicular accident on 27th December, 2012. The breakup of the c...
Baldev Singh vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~10. * + % W.P.(CRL) 513/2018 BALDEV SINGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 03.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Advocate versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS Through: Mr. Satish ..... Respondent with Aggarwal, Ms.Gitanjali Kumar, Adv for DRI Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Shakshi Aggarwal, G.P., Mr. Shyam Sundar Rai, Mr. Deepak Goyal, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek a declaration that Section 32A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) is ultravires to the extent it prevents the W.P.(CRL) 513/2018 Page 1 of 17 convicts under the said Act from getting remission under the Delhi Jail Manual.2. The petitioner is a convict under the NDPS Act. He stands convicte...
L&t-Sucg Jv Cc27 Delhi vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 03.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 121/2018 L&T-SUCG JV CC27 DELHI ........ Petitioner versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: ..... Respondent Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms Megha Mehta Agrawal, Ms Aakashi Lodha and Mr Samith Sagaranahalli. Mr Tarun Johri, Mr Ankit Saini and Mr Ankur Gupta. For the Respondent: CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 17.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in the context of the disputes relating to the Contract Agreement dated 22.01.2013 (hereafter the Agreement). The controversy involved in the present petition relates to the petitioners claim for reimbursement of O.M.P. (COMM) 121/2018 Page ...
M/S Classic Motors Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Goyal m.g Gases Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 143/2015 AND O.M.P. 301/2015 & IA99262015 Reserved on:27. h February,2018 Date of decision:20. h March, 2018 O.M.P1432015 M/S CLASSIC MOTORS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui and Mr. B. Anand, Advs. versus M/S GOYAL M.G GASES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Simran Mehta, Adv. O.M.P3012015 & IA99262015 M/S GOYAL M.G GASES PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui and Mr. B. Anand, Advs. versus M/S CLASSIC MOTORS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Simran Mehta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been OMP Nos.143/2015 & 301/2015 Page 1 filed by the parties challenging the Arbitral Award dated 25th September, 2014 read with the correction of the same vide order dated 22nd November, 2014 ...
Daksh Bassi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * + W.P.(C) 977/2018 & CM No.4144/2018 (Stay) DAKSH BASSI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Surya Nath Pandey, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocate with Lt.Col. Ravikanth & Swg. Cdr. S.N.Singh, Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Devik Singh & Mr.Akash Mohapatra, Advocates for R-2 & R-3/UPSC. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER2003.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by his non-selection by the % 1. respondents in the National Defence Academy and Naval Academy Examination (1)-2017 for NDA-139 Course and has prayed for issuance of a writ/direction to the respondents to constitute a Review Medial Board to re-examine him.2. The brief facts of the case are that in January, 2017, the respondent No.2/UPSC had published an Examination Notice for W.P.(C) 977/2018 Page 1 of 4 conducting examinations for admission to the Army, Navy and Air Fo...
Puran Chand (Since Deceased Thr His Lrs) vs.prabhat (Since Deceased Th ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~34 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 03.2018 RSA472018, CAV2222018, C.M.Nos. 10494-95/2018 PURAN CHAND (SINCE DECEASED THR HIS LRS) Through: Mr. Bharat Arora, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus PRABHAT (SINCE DECEASED THR HIS LRS) ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This second Appeal impugns an order dated 03.01.2018 passed by the learned ASCJ in RCA No.18/2016 which allowed the respondents appeal against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2014 in Suit No.313 of 2014, a suit for mandatory injunction. The appellant contends that he is the owner of the property C-57, Shiv Gali, Nanak Chand Basti, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi (referred to as suit property) by way of a family settlement but the impugned order has recorded that the plaintiff has proven his right, title and interest to the property by way of a registered Sale Deed of 1966.2. The impugned order considered the judgment of this ...
Satinder Kaur & Ors. Vs.amrik Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.277/2018 + % SATINDER KAUR & ORS. 20th March, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate with AMRIK SINGH & ORS. versus Mr. Preet Singh, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.10928/2018 & 10930/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. C.M. No.10929/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 71 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.277/2018 and C.M. No.10931/2018 (u/s 151 CPC) 3. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the plaintiffs in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 18.7.2017 by which RFA No.277/2018 Page 1 of 8 trial court has dismissed the suit for partition, declaration and injunction filed by the appe...
Ascot Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd & Anr. Vs.connaught Plaza Restaurant ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h February, 2018 Date of decision:20. h March, 2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 12/2017 ASCOT HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajat Arora Vishalakshi Singh, Advs. . Appellants and Ms. CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Kanika Agnihotri, Mr.Preet Singh Oberoi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 37(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the order dated 12th April, 2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in arbitration proceedings No.DAC/1476/12-16, Connaught Plaza Restaurant vs. Ascot Hotels & Resorts Ltd. & Anr. The Arbitrator vide his impugned order has directed maintenance of status quo with respect to the license area that is an area of approximately 2500 sq.ft, covered area along with terrace in the building constructed on Khasra No.65and Khasra No.621 in Mauja Gahi, ...
Chaitanya Kumar Bhardwaj vs.the New India Assurance Company Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~1 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 20, 2018 MAC.APP. 718/2015 & CM No.19672/2015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Awantika Manohar, Advocate versus CHAITANYA KUMAR BHARDWAJ & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Lokesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Himanshu Sharma, Advocates for R-1 + MAC.APP. 132/2018 CHAITANYA KUMAR BHARDWAJ ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Lokesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Himanshu Sharma, Advocates versus ABHISHEK SINGH AND ORS (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate and Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocate for R-2 Ms.Awantika Manohar, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Mac.A.Nos. 718/2015 & 132/2018 Page 1 of 7 1. Impugned Award of 8th July, 2015 grants compensation of `34,19,342/- with interest @ 9% to Chaitanya Kumar Bhardwaj on account of the injuries sustained by him in a vehicular accident on 27th December, 2012. The breakup of the c...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »