Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lalit Kumar vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2519/2017 and CM APPL. 10882/2017 (stay) 1. LALIT KUMAR Through: Mr. Ram Kumar, Mr. K.K. Nangia and Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocates with Mr. Vinesh Kr., SO, SSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % The petitioner is aggrieved by his non-selection to the post of ORDER2003.2018 Constable (GD) in the recruitment examination conducted in the CAPFs, NIA & SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles Examination, 2015.2. The facts of the case as narrated in the writ petition are that the respondent No.3/SSC had issued an advertisement in the Employment News on 24.01.2015 for filling up 62,390 vacancies to the post of Constable (GD) in the CAPFs, NIA & SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles Examination, 2015. Under the scheme of the examination, the candidates were required to fulf...
Altus Group India Private Limited vs.darrameks Hotels & Developers Pri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h March, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 499/2016 ALTUS GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Savita Sarna, Ms.Chinmayee Chandra and Ms.Manila Munjal, Advs. versus DARRAMEKS HOTELS & DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Saurabh Banerjee and Mr.Bikranu Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 06.07.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator inter-alia holding therein that the termination of the Agreement dated 14.02.2011 by the respondent was invalid and consequentially granting the claims of the respondent for refund of the mobilization advance as also awarding damages for such unlawful termination in favour of the respondent and against the petitio...
Abhay Kumar Mishra vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1004/2017 Reserved on:7. h March, 2018 Decided on:20. h March, 2018 ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anand Shankar, Advocate for Mr. Bipin Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State. NEERAJ MISHRA CRL.A. 1107/2017 ...Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate(DHCLSC). versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment dated 3rd August 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions JudgeI (North- East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.44875/2015 arising out of FIR No.182/2010 registered at Police Station (PS) New Usmanpur convicting Abhay Kumar Mishra (Appellant in Crl.A.No.1004/2017) Crl.A.1004/2017 & Crl.A.1107/2017 Page 1 of 20 (Accused No.3: A-3)...
Shaleen Jain vs.rishabh Kumar Jain and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 291/2015 & I.A.Nos.2320/2015, 10659/2015, 10957/2015 SHALEEN JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Ritu Gupta with Mr.Aman Rastogi, Advocates with plaintiff in person. versus RISHABH KUMAR JAIN AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate for D-1 with D-1 in person. Mr.Ashish Sharma, Advocate for D-2 & 3 with D-2 & 3 in person. Mr.Sunil K.Chaudhary with Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Advocates for D-5 & 6 with D-5 & 6 in person. Ms.Sadhna Jain, D-7 in person. Mr.Sidharth Jain, D-8 in person. Date of Decision:20. h March, 2018 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. In pursuance to the last order, the plaintiff as well as defendant nos.1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 are personally present in Court.2. After some discussions, learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant nos.1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 pray that a final decree of partition be passed CS(OS) 291/2015 Page 1 of 3 defining the share of the parties in property bearing ...
Beena Mahajan & Anr. Vs.smriti Sangeeta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos.262/2018 & 266/2018 RFA No.262/2018 Reserved on:16. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:20. h March, 2018 BEENA MAHAJAN & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. B.K. Pal, Advocate with Mr. Natansh Kumar Pal, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent SMRITI SANGEETA2 RFA No.266/2018 MOHIT MAHAJAN Through: Mr. B.K. Pal, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Natansh Kumar Pal, Advocate. versus SMRITI SANGEETA & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Respondents To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. No.10013/2018 (for condonation of delay) in RFA No.262/2018 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned. RFA Nos.262/2018 & 266/2018 Page 1 of 15 C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.10196/2018 (exemption) in RFA No.266/2018 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.10195/2018 (condonation of delay) in RFA No.266/2018 3. For the reasons state...
Chatar Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~83 and 84 * % + W.P.(C) 2608/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:20. h March, 2018 CHATAR SINGH AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 2695/2016 DHARAMPAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Mr.Harpreet Singh & Mr.Mool Chand Verma, Advocates for the petitioners in both the matters. Ms.Shubhra Parashar and Dr.G.L.Bhatia, Advocates for UOI/respondents no.1 and 2. Ms.Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for the LAC/L&B department in Item No.83. Mr.R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the LAC/L&B department in Item No.84. Ms.Renuka Arora, Adv. for DSIIDC in both the matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Since both the writ petitions raise a common question of law, for the sake of convenience a common judgment is being rendered although both the petitions have been heard separately.2. These are pet...
Rahul Alias Batola vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~R * 42&43 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1042/2014 MAHENDER SINGH @ MOTA ....Appellant STATE + Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Insp. Ashok Giri, PS Mandir Marg CRL.A. 1316/2014 RAHUL alias BATOLA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Suneet Verma and Ms. Preeti, Advocates versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Insp. Ashok Giri, PS Mandir Marg % CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER2003.2018 1. These are two appeals directed against the impugned judgment dated 13th February 2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.37/2014 arising out of an CRL.A. 1042/2014 and 1316/2014 Page 1 of 14 FIR No.254/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Mandir Marg convicting the two Appellants under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order and sentence dated 17th February, 2014 whereby eac...
Mohd. Ashraf vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:07. 09.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:20.03.2018 CRL.A. 1306/2015 MOHD. ASHRAF STATE CRL.A. 16/2016 MOHD. MUSTAQ STATE versus versus .....Appellant No.1 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant No.2 ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC), Mr. Aditya Vikram and Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocates for Appellant No.1 Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate (DHCLSC) for Appellant No.2 Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the SHO/Inspector State Sanjeev Kumar, SI Rohit Kumar, P.S. Jamia Nagar with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Crl.A. Nos.1306/2015 and 16/2016 Page 1 of 38 JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present criminal appeals instituted under the provisions of section 374 read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as CrPC), assail the judgment and order on sentence dated 28.09.2015 and 30.09.2015, respectively; rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessions ...
Amit Sahni vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)No.10838/2016 % Date of decision :20. h March, 2018 AMIT SAHNI Through :... Petitioner (Adv.) in person. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Anumita Chandra, Adv. for Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for R-1. Mr. H.S. Parihar and Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Advs. for R-2/RBI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petitioner has made a grievance that the banks were levying merchant discount rates on the payments which were being received by them through debit/credit cards.2. In this regard, Mr. K.S. Parihar, ld. counsel for the respondent no.2 has handed over a copy of the circular dated 6th December, 2017 addressed by the Reserved Bank of India to all banks inter alia directing as follows : W.P.(C)No.10838/2016 Page 1 of 2 3. 6. Banks are also advised to ensure that merchants on- boarded by them do n...
M/S Himland Housing Private Limited & Ors. Vs.m/s Akash & Associates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.276/2018 + % M/S HIMLAND HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. 20th March, 2018 .....Appellants Through: Mr. Sumeet Kaul, Advocate. versus M/S AKASH & ASSOCIATES CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.10790/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.10789/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 68 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.276/2018 and C.M. No.10788/2018 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant no.1 in the suit RFA No.276/2018 Page 1 of 7 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 23.8.2017 by which trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of moneys filed by the respondent/plaintiff. The amount which has been decreed ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »