Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar Jha vs.central Railside Warehouse Company Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 21, 2018 W.P.(C) 2749/2018 & CMs 11184-85/2018 RAJESH KUMAR JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Anunaya Mehta, Advocates versus CENTRAL RAILSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gourab Banerji, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Mr. Sahil Tagotra and Ms. Raka Chatterjee, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Against penalty of removal from service, petitioner had preferred a statutory appeal (Annexure P-11), which is detailed one running into 28 pages.2. Impugned order of 11th December, 2017 (Annexure P-2) rejects petitioners appeal being devoid of merits by simply observing that miscellaneous contentions raised by petitioner pertaining to his eligibility, performance, allegations of bias, favouritism, etc., have been found to be vague, unclear and irrelevant to the charges framed against petitioner. Impugned order also takes note of the fact that...
North, Mcd vs.jai Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~4 & 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Decided on :-"21st March, 2018 CM (M) 532/2011 & CM Nos. 8796/2011, 11276/2011, 5842/2015 MCD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr. Shivam Goel, Advs. versus JAI SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Bhatt & Mr.Kuber Giri, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi, Adv. for DTC. CM (M) 1105/2012 & CM No.17445/2012 NORTH, MCD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr. Shivam Goel, Advs. versus JAI SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Bhatt & Mr.Kuber Giri, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi, Adv. for DTC. Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh & Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. for DDA. CM (M) No.532/2011 & conn. Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This order is being passed in continuation of a detailed common order passed on 13.07.2017 and for purposes...
Suresh @ Pawan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~5 to 8 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 34/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 44/2018 + + SURESH @ PAWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate and Mr. Sanjeev Yadav, Advocate STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 159/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 247/2018 ISLAM Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.A. 162/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 250/2018 KALIM @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. + CRL.A. 163/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 251/2018 KISHAN Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent CRL.A.34/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 21 Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP + CRL.A. 61/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 115/2018 SADDAQ HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chanan Parwani, Advocate with Ms. Sajni Kachwaha and...
Onkar Nath Kapoor Through Lrs & Ors. Vs.jawahar Lal Kapoor (Deceased) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.906/2017 + % ONKAR NATH KAPOOR THROUGH LRS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate. 21st March, 2018 versus JAWAHAR LAL KAPOOR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.38768/2017 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.11124/2018 (U/o VI Rule 17 CPC) 2. This application for urging additional ground is allowed. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.906/2017 & CM Nos. 38767/2017 (interim direction), 38769/2017 (U/o XXVI Rule 10 CPC3 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit RFA No.906/2017 Page 1 of 14 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 3.7.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for partition filed by the appellant...
Krishan Bidhuri vs.narender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-2018
$~ * + % #11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2679/2015 KRISHAN BIDHURI ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Rish Khatri, Advocate with Mr. Archit Arora, Advocate versus NARENDER KUMAR ..... Defendant Through None Date of Decision:21. t March, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs.2,32,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Thirty Two Lacs Only) along with interest @ 8% per annum.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant, claiming himself to be owner in possession of property bearing Khasra No.792 at Village Manadpur Khadar, Abadi, now known as Madanpur Khadar Extension Part III, Tehsil Sarita Vihar (earlier Kalkaji), New Delhi - 110076 entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 11th May, 2013 with respect to a part of the aforesaid land admeasuring 3900 sq. yrds. (hereinafter referred to as suit property), for a sum of CS(OS) 2679/2015 Page 1 of 6 Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Only).3. It is st...
Sheila Wanti vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
........ RESPONDENTS versus SHEILA WANTI STATE & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % 1. ORDER2003.2018 Through $~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 76/2016 Through: Mr. Dinesh Monga, Advocate. ........ Petitioner This testamentary case is filed by the petitioner-Smt. Sheila Wanti wife of deceased late Sh. Mela Ram for grant of Letters of Administration with respect to the Will dated 12.8.1997 executed by Sh. Mela Ram. Sh. Mela Ram was a Hindu who died on 11.10.2003 at Delhi leaving behind as his legal heirs the petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 5. Respondent nos.2 to 5 are the children of the petitioner and late Sh. Mela Ram.2. Both the attesting witnesses to the Will, namely Mrs. Kanti Bala and Mrs. Swarn Bala have filed their affidavits by way of evidence. These two attesting witnesses have deposed with respect to execution and Test. Cas. No.76/2016 page 1 of 3 attestation of the Will dated 12.8.1997 of late Sh. Mela Ram. The attesting witnesses ha...
Mohd. Mustaq vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:07. 09.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:20.03.2018 CRL.A. 1306/2015 MOHD. ASHRAF STATE CRL.A. 16/2016 MOHD. MUSTAQ STATE versus versus .....Appellant No.1 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant No.2 ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC), Mr. Aditya Vikram and Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocates for Appellant No.1 Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate (DHCLSC) for Appellant No.2 Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the SHO/Inspector State Sanjeev Kumar, SI Rohit Kumar, P.S. Jamia Nagar with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Crl.A. Nos.1306/2015 and 16/2016 Page 1 of 38 JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present criminal appeals instituted under the provisions of section 374 read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as CrPC), assail the judgment and order on sentence dated 28.09.2015 and 30.09.2015, respectively; rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessions ...
Airport Authority of India vs.virender Khanna & Associates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 126/2018 & IA Nos.3795/2018 & 3796/2018 AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through:Mr Abhishek Thakur, Mr Anuj Kumar, and Mr Mohit Sharma, Advocates. versus VIRENDER KHANNA & ASSOCIATES .....Respondent Through: Mr Ramesh Singh with Mr Ranjay N. Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2003.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Airport Authority of India (hereafter AAI) has filed the present petition impugning an arbitral award dated 29.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by an Arbitral Tribunal constituted by a sole arbitrator. The impugned award was rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal in the context of the claims preferred by the respondent firm in respect of the agreement dated 29.02.2008 (hereafter the Agreement) entered into between the parties for Architectural/Engineering consultancy services for the proposed new Integrated Terminal Building at Birsa Munda Airport, Ranchi 2. AAI is a body constitu...
Mahender Singh @ Mota vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~R * 42&43 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1042/2014 MAHENDER SINGH @ MOTA ....Appellant STATE + Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Insp. Ashok Giri, PS Mandir Marg CRL.A. 1316/2014 RAHUL alias BATOLA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Suneet Verma and Ms. Preeti, Advocates versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Insp. Ashok Giri, PS Mandir Marg % CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER2003.2018 1. These are two appeals directed against the impugned judgment dated 13th February 2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.37/2014 arising out of an CRL.A. 1042/2014 and 1316/2014 Page 1 of 14 FIR No.254/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Mandir Marg convicting the two Appellants under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order and sentence dated 17th February, 2014 whereby eac...
Aslam vs.the State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1712/2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 03.2018 ASLAM versus THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr B.M.Shukla Mr Mukesh Kumar, APP. W/SI Sadhna, PS Anand Parbat. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2003.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Mr B.M.Shukla, Advocate, enters appearance for the petitioner and files his Vakalatnama. The same is taken on record.2.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.0123/2017 initially registered under Section 363 IPC. Subsequently, chargesheet has been filed under SectionIPC & Section 6 of the POCSO Act, Police Station Anand Parbat.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement BAIL APPLN.1712/2017 Page 1 of 3 given by the prosecutrix under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) as evidenced from the chargesheet is that she had voluntarily a...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »