Delhi Court March 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Nari Lepcha vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 24, 2018 CRL.A. 272/2017 NARI LEPCHA Through: Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms. Sudha Reddy, Advocates Versus ..... Appellant STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor with Inspector Rakesh Kumar Sharma and SI Baljinder Singh, P.S. Darya Ganj CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) SUNIL GAUR, J.1. Appellant was a Constable in IRB Sikkim Police, who was charged with murdering his five colleagues while on duty. Appellant was tried for the offence of murder and vide judgment of 24th August, 2015, he stood convicted for the offences under Sections 302/201/182 of IPC. Vide CRL.A. 272/2017 Page 1 of 12 impugned order of 23rd December, 2015, appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life for the offence of murder and for the offence under Section 201 of IPC, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years with default clause and for t...
Riyazuddin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RIYAZUDDIN Date of Decision: March 24, 2018 CRL.A. 586/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE Through: Mr.Amit Ahlawat, APP with ..... Respondent Insp.Narender Kumar, PS Hauz Khas CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) SUNIL GAUR, J.1. Impugned judgment of 1st February, 2017 holds appellant guilty of the offence of murdering his wife by strangulation. Vide impugned order of 15th February, 2017, appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of `5,000/- with penalty clause. The facts as noted in the impugned judgment are as under:-"It is the case of the prosecution that on 19.10.2014, DD No.14A was received by PS Khajuri Khas which Crl.A.No.586/2017 Page 1 of 9 was assigned to SI Mukesh Chauhan who visited the spot of incident alongwith Ct. Ashok and observed that a dead body of a lady was lying on a bed in a room at first floor of House...
Jatin Dhiman vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 03.2018 CRL. A. 584/2017 + JATIN DHIMAN STATE ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Katyayini and Ms. Sudha Reddy, Advs. versus Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) Aggrieved of the judgment of conviction for the offences under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and the order of sentence of imprisonment of life with fine of Rs.5,000/- ID3months RI for the offence under Section 302 IPC and 7 years RI with fine of Rs.3,000/- ID1month RI for the offence under Section 201 IPC, the appellant-convict has preferred the appeal in hand.2. Appellant was accused of causing murder of his father Sh. Vijay Dhiman and then, setting the dead body to fire using CRL. A. 584/2017 Page 1 of 17 kerosene. As per the prosecution case, the appellant, who was 19 years of age, had strangulated his father on the midnight of 7...
Rekha Gupta vs.ashok Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % REKHA GUPTA RFA No.279/2018 Reserved on:21. t March, 2018 Pronounced on:23. rd March, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Beniwal, Adv. Through: versus ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 18.9.2017 by which the trial court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in the suit filed for recovery of possession, mesne profits and damages. The suit property is a flat bearing No.D-192, Gali No.2, West Vinod Nagar, Delhi-110092. RFA No.279/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff claims ownership of the suit property in terms of the documentation being the Agreement to Sell, Power of Attorney, Will etc dated 20.7.2013 executed by Sh....
Shri Adarsh Shastri and Ors. Vs.election Commission of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.750/2018 % Reserved on:28. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 KAILASH GAHLOT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr. Manashwy Jha and Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocates. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Ayiala Imti and Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates for ECI. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, Ms. Rajul Jain with Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. Mr. Mudit Gupta and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates for R-4. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.751/2018 RAJESH RISHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Sameer Vashist, Mr. J.P. Gupta, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Ms. Astha Gupta, Mr....
M/S. Mehra Jewel Palace Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ndmc and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 03.2018 Pronounced on:23. 03.2018 + W.P.(C) 2198/2017 SAURABH MALHOTRA AND ORS NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC) AND ORS. Versus ..... Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS versus M/S. PEAREY LAL AND SONS (P) LTD. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS And connected matters: + W.P.(C) 3995/2017 + W.P.(C) 4789/2017, C.M. APPL.20759/2017 M/S. MEHRA JEWEL PALACE PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS ..... Petitioner ..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. B.B. Jain, Mr. Amitabh Marwaha and Mr. Abhay Jain, Advocates, in W.P.(C) 188/2018, W.P.(C) 2198/2017 & W.P.(C) 3995/2017. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Ms. Diksha Mathur, Advocates, for petitioner, in W.P.(C) 4789/2017. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Kaskaran Kaur, Advocates, with Mr. Puneet Gupta, DEO and Mr. Hardeep Singh, Jr. Assistant, NDMC, in all matters. Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal and Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates, for UOI, in W.P.(C) 188/2018...
Swapan Kumar Mandal vs.dhola Devi @ Dhawala Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d March, 2018 C.R.P. 19/2013 and CM APPL.1256/2013, 15798/2017 SWAPAN KUMAR MANDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.N. Sinha, Advocate versus DHOLA DEVI @ DHAWALA DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The present revision petition was filed questioning the correctness, legality and propriety of the order dated 02.07.2012 passed by the additional rent controller (ARC) on the file of eviction case (17/2011) of the respondent (concededly, the landlady) instituted on 09.08.2011 seeking an order against the petitioner (concededly, the tenant) under Section 14-D of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of her bona fide need for accommodating her daughter Anju and her family, she requiring their presence around her in her old age, she also being a widow. The petitioner had submitted an application for leave to contest under Section 25-B of the D...
Dheeraj vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~19 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : March 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 2900/2018 & CM No.11733/2018 DHEERAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Sunita Arora and Mr.Krishan Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha and Mr.Shubham Pundhir, Advocates for R-1 Mr.K.K.Tyagi and Mr.Anoop Kumar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. For the post of Junior Technical Assistant, petitioner was provisionally empanelled in the waitlist under the SC category at serial No.2. According to petitioners counsel, the final result was displayed on the second respondents website on 18th April, 2017 and it is the case of petitioner that thereafter petitioner has not received any e-mail regarding his appointment on the post of Junior Technical Assistant. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the cancellation of offer of appointment on the post of Junior Technical Assistant wa...
National Highways Authority of India vs.hindustan Construction Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Pronounced on:23. d March, 2018 FAO(OS) 192/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. Through : Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain and Mr. .... Appellant versus Mukesh Kumar, Advs. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD..... Respondent Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Malavika Ms. AakashiLodha and Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. Lal, FAO(OS) 195/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. Through : Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain and Mr. .... Appellant Mukesh Kumar, Advs. versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD...... Respondent Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Malavika Ms. AakashiLodha and Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. Lal, CORAM: HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR FAO(OS) 192/2017 & FAO(OS) 195/2017 Page 1 JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has, in FAO(OS) 192/2017 and FAO(OS) 195/2017,filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration ...
The Polo/Lauren Company L P vs.m/s Varsha & Co and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2018
$~ 6 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 673/2016 THE POLO/LAUREN COMPANY L P ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocates. versus M/S VARSHA & CO AND ANR Through ..... Defendants Ex-Parte Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off, damages, delivery up, rendition of accounts etc. against the defendants. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"43. That under the facts and circumstances of the present case the Plaintiff most respectfully prays that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to: (a) Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant No.1 and 2 by themselves as also through their individual proprietors/partners/principles, agents, representatives, distributors, assigns, heirs, successors, stock...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »