Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Kumar Goel & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~44 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 1790/2018, CM APPL.7393-7394/2018 ANIL KUMAR GOEL & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Kalia with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Shubham Pundir and Ms. Manish Saroha, Advocates. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Manish Mohan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises in the present writ petition is similar to the issue which was dealt with by another Single Judge of this Court via judgment dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)1275/2017, titled: Harpreet Singh Batra and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. W.P.(C)1790/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. In view of this submission, I am of the view that filing of the counter affidavit will not serve any purpose. It is especially so ...
R P Stone Clinic Private Limited vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~17 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 2.2018 + W.P.(C) 11672/2016 and CM No.45976/2016 R P STONE CLINIC PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Khowel and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Adv. for UOI with Mr. Gopal Singh, Dy. ROC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the only outstanding grievance of the petitioner is that in the master data available with the respondents, the Corporate Identification Number (in short CIN) of the petitioner-company is noticed twice over. Learned counsel for the respondents says that out of the two CINs, only one CIN is active while the other clearly is not available for e-filing. W.P.(C) 11672/2016 Page 1 of 2 2. To be noted, master data reflects the following : CIN Company Name Status U85110DL1991PTC265676 R P STONE CLINIC ACTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED ...
Mahendra Khandelwal vs.gaurish Garg & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4281/2017 Judgment delivered on:26. 02.2018 MAHENDRA KHANDELWAL versus GAURISH GARG & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: : For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Prateek Mehta, Mr. Himanshu Kaushik and Mr. Harish Kaushik, Advs. Mr. Govind Rishi, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Adv. For R-2 & 3 JUDGMENT2602.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Consequent to the production warrants issued on 24.10.2017, respondent No.3 and 4 have been produced from jail.2. The petitioner impugns order dated 28.08.2017 whereby the Revisional Court has set aside the order dated 22.05.2017 passed by the court of Metropolitan Magistrate.3. The Metropolitan Magistrate had rejected the application of CRL.M.C. 4281/2017 Page 1 of 5 respondent No.1 - Mr. Gaurish Garg for dropping the proceedings qua him. It was contended in the said application that he...
Tarun Kumar & Anr vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h February, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4842/2017 TARUN KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi, Ms. Anju Thomas, Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Insp. Nitin Kumar PS EOW, Mandir Marg. Mr. Shri Singh, Ms. Maneka Khanna, Advs. for R-2 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioners Tarun Kumar and Narender Kumar both directors of M/s. DD Global Capital Pvt. Ltd. inter-alia seek quashing of FIR No.53/2017 under Sections 406/420/120B IPC registered at PS EOW Mandir Marg Complex, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a bare perusal of the FIR shows that there is no allegation of inducement against the petitioners. The FIR is an abuse of the process of the law, lodged belatedly and a result of the family dispute inter-se the complainan...
Rakesh Kumar Singh Bisht vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : February 12, 2018 Judgment Delivered on : February 26, 2018 W.P.(C) 1263/2018 RAKESH KUMAR SINGH BISHT Through: Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR Through: Mr.Sameer Agarwal, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.CM No.5273/2018 (by the petitioner for exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.5272/2018 (by the petitioner for condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the petition is condoned.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) No.1263/2018 1. This writ petition is another glaring example of how in the name of compassion, even after the decades of the death of the bread earner of the family, the policy of the Government to provide employment to the dependent of the deceased empl...
Dr Mirdul Kumar Sahani vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1204/2018 & CM Nos.5027-28/2018 DR MIRDUL KUMAR SAHANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rudreshwar Singh, Mr.Saurabh Jain, MR.Sumeet Kr. Singh & Mr.Abhimanyu Kapoor, Advs. versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Satya Prakash Singh, Advs. for UOI. Mr.Kundan K. Mishra & Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, who was elected as a Member of the Central Council of Homeopathy pursuant to the results of the elections of the Council declared on 17.08.2017, has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 15.01.2018 vide which the respondent No.1 has based on an inquiry, declared the election ...
Shiya Khanna vs.state Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 2.2018 W.P.(C) 1770/2018, C.M. APPL..7353-7354/2018 SHIYA KHANNA Through: Mr. Sonal Anand with Mr. Ayush Sai, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocate. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.7353/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 1770/2018, CM APPL.7354/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Gautam Narayan, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the order that I propose to pass, learned counsel says no counter affidavit is required. W.P.(C) 1770/2018 Page 1 of4 3. The petitioner assails the notice dated 13.2.2018 on the ground that no notice was given to her before issuing the impugned notice. Via the impugned notice, the respondents had called upon the petitioner to vacate 26 feet of the notified forest area which ...
Union of India and Anr. Vs.charan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1768/2018 and CM APPL. Nos. 7334-35/2018 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus CHARAN SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER2602.2018 1. The petitioners/Northern Railways are aggrieved by the judgment dated 08.04.2015, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.1432/2010, filed by the respondent praying inter alia for issuing directions to declare the results of his screening which was held in the year 1985 and for regularization to the post of a Safai Karamchari, the results whereof were declared in the year 1987 and if the respondent had made the grade, he be regularized with effect from the year 1987 alongwith all consequential benefits, at par with those who were similarly placed as him. Additionally, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 3.11.2017 ...
Diwan Singh Yadav vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:26th February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11391/2016 DIWAN SINGH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Panday Advocate for LAC/L&B/R-2, Mr. Pawan Mathur Advocate for DDA/R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of the petitioner admeasuring 1/6th share out of 37 Bighas 16 Biswas comprised in Khasra No.341(4-05), 343(03-08), 344(09-04), 345(03-01), 346(14-11), 347(01-02) and 348(02-05) (i.e. 03 Bighas 15 Biswas and 6 Marla), situated in the revenue estate of village Ladha Sarai, Tehsil Mehrauli...
Sunil @ Raghu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 997/2015 Reserved on:6. h February, 2018 Decided on:26. h February, 2018 SUNIL @ RAGHU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar and Mr. Harsh Singhal, Advocates. STATE + FAHIM STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent AND CRL.A. 1053/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Avinash, Advocate. versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment dated 16th October 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Crl.A. 997/ 2015 & 1053/2015 Page 1 of 33 North West, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.24/2013 arising out of FIR No.313/2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Mahendra Park, convicting the Appellants Sunil @ Raghu (A-1) and Fahim @ Sonu (A-2) for the offences under Sections 3IPC, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »