Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nagender Rathi vs.cbi, Scb, Lucknow
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
Ravi Dutt Sharma and Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~50 * % + W.P.(C) 7239/2016 versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :06. h February, 2018 RAVI DUTT SHARMA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Chandiwal, Advocate. ........ Petitioners GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advocate for DSIIDC Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioners i.e. agricultural land in village Karala in Rectangle No.3Khasra Nos. (0-04), Khasra No.38/(2-16), (0-7), Khasra No.38 (4-9) 3 (4-9), (3-16), 10 (4-12), Khasra No.3(1-0), 1(4-9), 1(3-16) (hereinafter referred to as Subject Land), has lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency i...
Manoj @ Lekhraj vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~ * R-67 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 835/2014 MANOJ @ LEKHRAJ Date of Decision:6. h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with Insp. Raj Kumar, I.O. ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 19th April 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.38 of 2013 arising out of FIR No.262 of 2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Mangol Puri convicting the Appellant, Manoj @ Lekhraj, for the offence under Section 120B read with Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 28th April 2014 whereby for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life and a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs and in...
V M Singh vs.madan Lal Mangotra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h February, 2018 C.R.P. 147/2016 & CM Nos. 33394-95/2016, 40375/2017 V M SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Adv. versus MADAN LAL MANGOTRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.K. Jain & Mr. Rajiv Kr. Ghawana, Advs. for R-1 to 6. Ms. Jasmine Damkewala, Adv. for LRs of R-19. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) The petition at hand seeks to assail the order dated 04.04.2016 1. passed on the file of miscellaneous case 10792/whereby the application under Order 9 Rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) of the first to sixth respondents (collectively, the plaintiffs) for restoration of the civil suit (No.71/08/94) which was dismissed in default on 19.03.2011, was allowed. The petitioner herein was eighth defendant in the said civil suit and as per his case he being the sole party on the side of defendants putting in contest. The grievance of the petitioner is th...
Sunil Kumar vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:6. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9428/2017 SUNIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the LAC, copy supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. Counter affidavit be taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiate...
Woodhill Infrastructure Ltd. Vs.state of Uttarakhand and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:6. February 2018 + W.P. ( C) 1085/2018 WOODHILL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Sadiqua Fatima and Mr. Akash Singh, Advs. versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Satya Prakash Singh and Mr. Surender Kumar, Advs. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2. Mr. Bhardwaj, CGSC submits that he does not wish to file a counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents and that he would want to argue the matter based on the record as presently available.3. This is a second round of litigation. First round of litigation ended with the order dated 31.8.2017, passed by this court in WP(C)No.6964/2017. In that round, the writ petitioner challenged the order dated 3.7.2017, whereby, the petitioner was debarred from W.P. (C) 1085/2018 P...
r.krishan vs.uoi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 06, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6590/2016 & C.M. 27062/2016 (i) (ii) + W.P.(C) 760/2017 & C.M. 3503/2017 (iii) + W.P.(C) 762/2017 & C.M. 3509/2017 (iv) + W.P.(C) 790/2017 & C.M. 3665/2017 P.K.BAJPAI BOTHA PRASAD RAO I T N VEERARAGHAVAN R.KRISHAN ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Advocate Versus UOI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sarat Chandra & Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.1-UOI in W.P.(C) 6590/2016 Mr. Kavindra Gill, Mr. J.C. Ranjan & Ms. Shashi Ranjan, Advocates for respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 760/2017; 762/2017 & 790/2017 Mr. Satyawan Shekhawat & Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR In the above captioned four petitions, the challenge is to the initial JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. order of 1st August, 2014 (Annexure P-5), vide which respondent Bharat W.P.(C) 6590/2016 & connected petitions Page 1 of 6 Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) has bee...
Mahabir Singh (Since Deceased) Through Lrs & Ors. Vs.hardeep Singh @ D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:06. h February, 2018 CM(M) 298/2008 and CM nos.3421/2008, 5891/2010 and 37580/2017 MAHABIR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate versus HARDEEP SINGH @ DEEPA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. S. Sharma, Advocate for R-4 Mr. Shiv Kumar, husband of Rajesh Rani (R1) in person Mr. Vijay Bahadur Singh, husband of Manorama Singh (R2) in person Mr. Rajender Singh son of Bhupender Kaur (R3) in person + CM(M) 415/2008 DAYAWATI Through: Dr. S. Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MAHABIR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate CM(M) Nos.298/2008 & 415/2008 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The order under challenge in these petitions was passed on 01.03.2008 by the Civil Judge in Executi...
Arvinder Kaur Sethi vs.krishan Kumar Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2104/2008 ARVINDER KAUR SETHI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. G.S. Raghav and Mr. Dashrath Raghav, Advs. Versus KRISHAN KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vijay K. Gupta, Mr. Shailesh Tiwary and Ms. Mehul Gupta, Advs. for D-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER0602.2018 % IAs No.8508/2014 & 8509/2014 (of D-1 to 4 for recall of the compromise recorded on 2nd April, 2014 in terms whereof the suit was disposed of and for stay of compromise terms), 7615/2014 (u/S151CPC), CRL.M.A. No.10334/2014 (u/S340CrPC) & IA No.10168/2017 (of D-1 to 4 seeking permission to let out the property) 1. A compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was drawn up in this suit as far back as on 2nd April, 2014 in terms of IA No.6236/2014 filed by the plaintiff Arvinder Kaur Sethi and the defendants No.1 to 4 namely Krishan Kumar Aggarwal, Santosh Rani, Honey Gupta and Mika Gupta. Th...
Rajesh vs. Ram Babu Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAJESH RFA No.91/2018 5th February, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Gourav Puri, Advocate with Mr. Aditeya Bali, Advocate. RAM BABU SHARMA versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.3330/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.91/2018 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 27.10.2017 by which trial court has decreed the suit for a sum of Rs.4 lacs alongwith RFA No.91/2018 Page 1 of 7 interest @ 9% per annum being the advance price paid by the respondent/plaintiff to the appellant/defendant under the agreement to sell dated 4.5.2012 and which agreement to sell could not go through.3. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed ...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »