Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Jain Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.1417/1979 + % M/S JAIN EXPORTS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate. 6th February, 2018 versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sunita Dutt, Advocate for D-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is an old suit of the year 1979. Plaintiff in the suit is M/s Jain Exports Private Limited. The contesting defendant in the suit is defendant No.1/The New Indian Assurance Company Limited. The second defendant in the suit is a proforma defendant/The Punjab and Sind Bank.2. By the subject suit plaintiff seeks recovery of a sum of Rs.63,95,102.72/- along with interest. Amount which is claimed by the plaintiff is on account of the goods being Brass Scrap (Honey CS (OS) No.1417/1979 Page 1 of 8 quality) which were shipped under M/s Bentrex & Company, Singapore by the vessel SS AVERILLA having been lost on ...
Anil Prakash & Anr. Vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :6. h FEBRUARY, 2018 Through : Mr.Jaydeep Sarma, Advocate. TEST.CAS. 38/2004 & IA461704 (u/O XXXIX R1&2 CPC) ANIL PRAKASH & ANR. STATE & ORS Through : Mr.Dinesh Agnani, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Leena Tuteja & Mr.Ishaan Chawla, Advs. for R2A to 2D. ........ RESPONDENTS versus ........ Petitioners CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Sections 276 and 278 read with Sections 218 and 237 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter the Act) has been filed by the petitioners Anil Prakash and Sunil Prakash for grant of Probate / Letters of Administration.2. Briefly stated, the petitioners case is that deceased Dr.Satya Prakash, a male Hindu, died at Sahi Hospital on 02.02.2001. Upon his death, the deceased left behind his wife Usha Kiran (since expired on 25.11.2002), Anil Prakash (petitioner No.1) - son, Sunil Prakash (petitioner No.2) - son and Rita Gulati (daughter) - r...
M/S Anantraj Agencies Pvt Ltd vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7570/2017 & CM No.31262/2017 M/S ANANTRAJ AGENCIES PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Arun Monga, Mr Saket Sikri and Mr Suryajyoti Singh Paul, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ajay Verma & Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Advocates for DDA. Mr. A.P. Sahay (CGSC) with Ms. J.Priyadarshi, Advocates for UOI/respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0602.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the communications dated 08.06.2017, 17.03.2017 and 07.11.2016 issued by respondent no.2 (Delhi Development Authority hereafter DDA) rejecting the representations made by the petitioner for restoration of lease in respect of the property bearing No.E-2, Jhandewalan, E-Scheme, New Delhi- 110055 (hereafter the said property) and for conversion of the said property from leasehold to free hold, in favour of the...
Swarup Group of Industries & Anr vs.national Agricultural Cooperative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS)No.127/2017 & CM Nos.15267, 15269/2017 % Date of decision :6. h February, 2018 SWARUP GROUP OF INDUSTRIES & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal Sachdeva and Ms. Garima Sharma, Advs. versus NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING ..... Respondent FEDERATION OF INDIA Through : Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Akshita Katoch and Mr. Pranay Kapur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.15269/2017 (Condonation of delay) 1.2.3. Heard. For the reasons stated, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This application is allowed. FAO(OS) 127/2017 1. By way of the instant appeal, the appellant assails an order dated 15th November, 2016 passed by the learned Single Judge FAO(OS)No.127/2017 Page 1 of 11 allowing IA No.6466/2016 filed by the respondent National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED he...
Anita Khanna & Ors vs.reserve Bank of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:06. 02.2018 + W.P. (C) 1102/2018, CM APPL.4599/2018 & 4600/2018 ANITA KHANNA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Mangla with Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocates. % versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Parihar with Mr. H.S. Parihar, Advocates for RBI/R-1. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1/RBI. In view of the order that I propose to pass, no notice is required to be issued to the respondent no.2 bank for the moment.2. In this writ petition, the following substantial prayers have been sought: - the a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction, directing the Respondent No.1 to ensure that the Respondent No.2 comply with the mandate of No.DBR. No.BP.BC.2/21.04.048/2015-16 dated 01st July, 2015 issued by the Respondent No.1; and...
Sunil Saini vs.state Thru Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
Nitin Chauhan vs.cbi, Scb, Lucknow
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
Sona Devi and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8194/2017 SONA DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :6th February, 2018 Through Mr. R.K. Bidhuri, Advocate. versus CORAM: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavits have not been filed. Mr. Jain, counsel for LAC has handed over the counter affidavit in Court, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to counsel for the petitioners.2. With consent of both the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of petitioners having 1/9th share in Khasra nos.213 (4-12), 214 (...
Grasim Industries Limited vs.grasim Electricals and Switch Gear Pvt. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 64/2018 & I.A. 927/2015 GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Ajay Sahni with Ms.Kritika Sahni, Advocates. Versus GRASIM ELECTRICALS AND SWITCH GEAR PVT. LTD. Through Ex parte % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ..... Defendants Date of Decision:06. h February, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution, damages etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-""29. The Plaintiff prays:-"(i) For an order for perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant, its directors, principal officers, associate/sister firms/companies, licensees, franchisees, distributors, stockiest, agents, sub-agents, servants, representatives, etc. from using the impugned trade mark/ trade name GRASIM or any other trade mark/name which incorporates the prior adopted, prior used and registered trademark GRASIM of the Plai...
Mohd Yameen vs.satender Singh Sirohi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h February 2018 + RFA282017 MOHD YAMEEN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. M. Singh (M:9818016311) and Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocates. versus SATENDER SINGH SIROHI ..... Respondent Through: Mohammad Arif, Advocate. (M:9810405873) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal against order dated 19th February 2016 by which the suit filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has been rejected as being barred under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter, CPC).2. The suit filed by the Plaintiff is one for recovery of money paid to the Defendant. Admittedly, the Plaintiff had filed an earlier suit seeking the following prayers. (a) to pass a Decree of Mandatory Injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants thereby directing the defendants to deliver the original copy of Agreement to Sell dated 25.10.2012 duly signed by the defendant ...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »