Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
I T N Veeraraghavan vs.uoi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 06, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6590/2016 & C.M. 27062/2016 (i) (ii) + W.P.(C) 760/2017 & C.M. 3503/2017 (iii) + W.P.(C) 762/2017 & C.M. 3509/2017 (iv) + W.P.(C) 790/2017 & C.M. 3665/2017 P.K.BAJPAI BOTHA PRASAD RAO I T N VEERARAGHAVAN R.KRISHAN ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Advocate Versus UOI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sarat Chandra & Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.1-UOI in W.P.(C) 6590/2016 Mr. Kavindra Gill, Mr. J.C. Ranjan & Ms. Shashi Ranjan, Advocates for respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 760/2017; 762/2017 & 790/2017 Mr. Satyawan Shekhawat & Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR In the above captioned four petitions, the challenge is to the initial JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. order of 1st August, 2014 (Annexure P-5), vide which respondent Bharat W.P.(C) 6590/2016 & connected petitions Page 1 of 6 Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) has bee...
Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd vs.inder Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h February, 2018 CM(M) 222/2015 and CM47272015 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing counsel with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi and Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocates Versus INDER SINGH & ORS Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand seeks to assail the order dated 22.11.2014 whereby the petitioner has been impleaded as an additional defendant, besides two others, they being Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Municipal Corporation of Delhi, in the civil suit (CS no.135/14/09) which was instituted by the respondents in February 2009 seeking compensation / damages on account of death of their son Rakesh Singh invoking the provisions contained in the Fatal Accident Act, 1855.2. It may be mentioned here that Rakesh Singh, per the pleadings in the suit, died upon being electrocuted, he having come in contact with the high tension power lines of the pe...
Jai Parkash Gupta vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:06. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4576/2013 JAI PARKASH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Fanish K. Jain, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jain and Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for respondent/LAC-L&B, GNCTD. Mr.Ajay Verma, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms.Diviani Khanna, Advocate for respondent/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner seeks a direction, order or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the impugned Notification bearing No.F.11(17)/91/L&B/LA/6518 dated 28.04.1995 as also Notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this petition are that a Notification unde...
Maninder Singh Maker and Ors vs.ajit Singh Maker and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:17. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:06. h February, 2018 + CS(OS) 558/2014 IA Nos.4962/2015, 434/2018, 433/2018, CCP(O) 2/2018, CRL.M.A. 590/2018, 8598/2016 MANINDER SINGH MAKER AND ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms.Kajal Chandra, Ms.Divya Puri & Mr.Viren Kapur, Advocates for plaintiff No.1. Mr.Prashant Mehta & Mr.Alok Tripathi, Advocates for plaintiff No.2. versus AJIT SINGH MAKER AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Samrat Nigam, Mr.Sudarshan Rajan & Mr.Arjun Gadhoke, Advocates for defendant no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA Nos.15607 and 15608 of 2017 1. These applications are (a) for modification of the order dated 20.11.2017 to an extent to exempt defendant no.1 the applicant herein from depositing an amount of Rs.19.2 crores and (b) grant relief to the defendant no.1 to place on record the additional documents/records.2. On 20.11.2011 an order was passed directing the defendant no.1 either ...
Neeraj Kumar vs.state Thru Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
G D Bhatt vs.state Thru Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
Singh Raj & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4082/2017 SINGH RAJ & ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :6th February, 2018 Through Mr. Prashant Sharma, Proxy counsel for Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus CORAM: UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Nikhil Goel, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has not been filed. Mr. Jain, counsel for LAC has handed over the counter affidavit in Court, which is taken on record. Copy of same has been supplied to counsel for the petitioners.2. With consent of both the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land measuring 1 bigha 7 biswas out of Khasra ...
S K Verma and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 06, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4946/2016 1. S K VERMA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Kakkar, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC& Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocates for respondent No.1-UOI Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Addl. Standing Counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, first petitioner is the Principal, second petitioner is Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) and remaining petitioners are Trained Graduate Teachers (TGT) of respondent No.4-School, who seek direction to respondents to refix their pay w.e.f 1st January, 2006, inclusive of entry pay and increments. The benefit of additional increments / bunching is also sought in this petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioners relies upon a decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Adhyapak Shakti Manch, Delhi Vs. Government of W.P.(C) 4946/2016 Page 1 NC...
pr.commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 Date of Decision:06. 02.2018 ITA1352018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Deptt. versus NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORK INDIA PVT LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS, NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORK PVT LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra with Ms. Manasvini Bajpai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the ITAT which concluded that the assessment made in that case, was in respect of a company that had ceased to exist. It urges that in the facts of this case the ruling of this Court in Spice Entertainment Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax 247 CTR500(Del.) is inapplicable.2. The assessee M/s Nokia Siemens Network Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the old company) had filed its returns for A.Y. 2006-07 on 29.11.2006. R...
Mohd Siraj Ali vs.boarder Security of Force & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1088/2018 & CM No.4552/2018 MOHD SIRAJ ALI Through: Mr.Brajesh Pandey & Ms.Spiti Sarkar, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2/BSF BOARDER SECURITY OF FORCE & ANR CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0602.2018 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner who was recruited % 1. in the respondent No.2/BSF on the post of a Constable (GD) on 15.01.2012, praying inter alia quashing his termination order dated 24.09.2016 and for directing the respondents to continue him in service.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was recruited as a Constable (GD) in the respondent/BSF on 15.01.2012. On 16.06.2014, he got married to one Ms.Gulafsan. The petitioner claims that within a period of three months, reckoned from 16.06.2014, he was forcibly made to marry Ms.Zeenat Ara, his neighbour. It is the version ...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »