Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Marico Limited vs.gurcharan Singh Vidyarthi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~11 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 195/2018 No.17587/2012 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) MARICO LIMITED [Old CS(OS) No.2902/2012]. & ..... Plaintiff IA Through: Ms. Anuradha Salhotra & Ms. Nitya Thakur, Advs. Versus ..... Defendants Through: None. GURCHARAN SINGH VIDYARTHI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % The plaintiff instituted this suit against Mr. Gurcharan Singh ORDER0602.2018 Vidyarthi and Mr. Bal Krishan Chauhan, both partners of M/s J.S.B. Agro, for i) permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark PARACHUTE of the plaintiff by adopting the mark PARAFIT for the same goods; ii) permanent injunction from using a packaging deceptively similar to the plaintiffs packaging / label of its edible coconut oil sold under the trade mark PARACHUTE; iii) permanent injunction from using the similar shape, size, design and configuration of the registered designs of one litre container or any other designs deceptively similar to the said desig...
Veer Wati & Ors vs.the Land Acquisition Collector
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3734/2016 VEER WATI & ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :6th February, 2018 Through Mr. Bhagwat Prasad, Advocate. versus CORAM: THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land measuring 03 bighas 09 biswas pertaining to Khasra no.138 and land measuring 01 bigha pertaining to Khasra no.139 min., situated in the revenue estate of village Kotla, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act)...
Ranbir Kaur & Ors. Vs.delhi Sikh Gurudwara Managing Committee & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1104/2018 Date of Order: February 06, 2018 1. RANBIR KAUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saurabh Chaddha, Advocate Versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGING COMMITTEE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Srivats Kaushal & Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL In this petition, implementation of order of 11th February, 2009 (Annexure A-1) of respondent No.3-Directorate of Education in respect of payment of salary etc. in terms of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission is sought.... Petitioners are TGT teachers and though their case is that they had made various oral and written requests for implementation of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission but to no avail. Copy of such Representations has not been placed on record.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to...
Surinder Nayyar & Ors vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h February, 2018. CS(COMM) 265/2018 & IA No.1748/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC). SURINDER NAYYAR & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan with Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advs. versus Through: None. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.1749/2018 (exemption from filing copy of order dated 8th December, 2016 and 29th January, 2018) and IA No.1750/2018 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CS(COMM) 265/2018 & IA No.1748/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC).3. The five plaintiffs namely Surinder Nayyar, S.N. Malhotra & Sons, Om Prakash, Ashish Kumar and Manish Nayyar have instituted this suit against the sole defendant South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) for (i) declaration that the recovery sought to be made by the defendant SDMC pursuant to Circular No.03/EE(P)-I/SDMC/2015-2015 dated 08.05.2014, Circular No.03/E...
Nathan Singh Gulshan Alias Nathan vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2541/2015 Date of Judgment:06. h February, 2018 NATHAN SINGH GULSHAN @ NATHAN Through: Mr.B.S.Maan ........ Petitioner and Mr.Shitiz versus Agnihotri, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Siddharth Panda, Advocate for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Pulkit Choudhary, Advocate for applicant in CM No.35284/2017. Mr.S.K.Rout, Mr. Varun Goswami and Mr.Rahul Sinha, Advocates for applicant in CM No.616/2017. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.35284/2017 & 616/2017 (impleadment) By these applications, the applicants Ms.Ravita, Mr.Kali Ram and Mr.Tilak Raj, seek their impleadment in the writ petition. Mr.Maan, counsel for the petitioner without admitting that the applicants have any share in the property, submits that he has no objection, if the present applications are allowed. Heard. Accordingly, the present applications are allo...
Akhilesh Verma vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~10 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:06. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 3926/2017 AKHILESH VERMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Yogesh Dass Sharma, Ms. Shivani Sharma, Ms. Kshma Sharma and Mr. Bhairav Dass, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Rajesh Gogna and Ms. Vipra Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-1 and 2. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition which seeks to assail the order dated 14.05.2015, passed by the respondent no.2. Not only is the petitioner seeking quashing of the impugned order, as indicated above, he is also seeking writ of mandamus for issuance of a fresh passport after correcting his name and date of birth.2. According to the petitioner, his date of birth as per the Class- X certificate is 06.06.1989, whereas in the passport which he presently holds, respondent no.2 has entered his date of birth as W.P.(C) 3926/2017 Page 1 of 5 12.05.1985.3. Upon notice being issued...
Anil Thakur vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~ * + STATE NCT OF DELHI versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ANIL THAKUR CRL.A.209/2016 Reserved on: January 04, 2018 Pronounced on: February 06, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bahar U. Barqi with Mr. M. Rais Farooqui, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by, Anil Thakur, is directed against the impugned judgment dated 31st October 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Special Fast Track Court), East, North East & Shahdara Districts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.4dated 26th November 2009, registered at Police Station (PS) Shahdara, convicting him of the offences under Sections 376/302/201 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 26th November 2015 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to undergo (i) imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000 for the offence punishable under Section ...
Inder Bhan Singh vs.cbi, Scb, Lucknow
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
Vikas Baluni & Anr vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d January, 2018 Decided on:6. h February, 2018 + JASPAL SINGH GOSAIN CRL.A. 1003/2014 ...Appellant Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocate. versus CBI + CHANDER PAL & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1062/2014... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr.R.S.Malik, Mr.Vikas Dabas and Mr.Sparsh Chaudhary, Advocates. STATE (CBI) + SUNIL SAINI versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1104/2014 ...Appellant Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail,Mr.KhalilA.Ansari,Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr. Arif Shakeel, Ms.Astha and Mr.Sunil Sagar, Advocates. versus STATE THRU CBI +... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. And Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CRL.A. 1105/2014 CRL.A. 1003/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 105 SATBIR SINGH Through:Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Khalil A.Ansari, Mr.Farooqui Chaudhary, Mohammad Akhtar, Mr...
Indra Devi and Ors vs.uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8188/2017 INDRA DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :6th February, 2018 Through Mr. R.K. Bidhuri, Advocate. versus CORAM: UOI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Ms. Shahana Farah & Mr. Rahul Dubey, Advs. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has not been filed. Mr. Jain, counsel for LAC has handed over the counter affidavit in Court, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to counsel for the petitioners.2. With consent of both the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of petitioners having 1/9th share in Khasra nos.213 (4-12),...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »