Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dcm Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 02.2018 LPA4872017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta & Ms. Diksha Lal, Advocates. versus DCM LIMITED & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate and Mr. Gaurav Mitra along with Mr. Pratik Malik, Mr.Vaibhav Mishra & Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Advocates for respondent No.1/ DCM Ltd. Mr. P.C. Sharma, Advocate along with Ms. Vinnie Sharma, Adv. for the Monitoring Committee CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.C.M. No.1273/2018 1. By this order, we proceed to dispose of the aforesaid application. This application has been preferred by the respondent no.1 DCM Limited C.M. No.1273/2018 in LPA4872017 Page 1 of 28 (DCM) to seek stay of the sealing of Flatted Factory Complex (FFC) premises of the applicant situated at ...
Subramanyan Raja vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~6-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1310/2014 SURENDER @ DHEERAJ ..... Appellant Decided on:27. h February, 2018 STATE versus Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1327/2014 SUBRAMANYAN RAJA ..... Appellant STATE versus Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1340/2014 AMIT @ BUNTY ..... Appellant STATE NEERAJ STATE Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent versus CRL.A. 1366/2014 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent versus + + + Crl A1310of 2014 and batchmatters Page 1 of 55 + + + + + CRL.A. 1432/2014 SHRIKANT @ APPU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Bharat Sharma with Ms.Sonika, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1437/2014 RAJENDER PRASAD @ SHALU ..... ...
Sombir vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~6-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1310/2014 SURENDER @ DHEERAJ ..... Appellant Decided on:27. h February, 2018 STATE versus Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1327/2014 SUBRAMANYAN RAJA ..... Appellant STATE versus Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1340/2014 AMIT @ BUNTY ..... Appellant STATE NEERAJ STATE Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent versus CRL.A. 1366/2014 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent versus + + + Crl A1310of 2014 and batchmatters Page 1 of 55 + + + + + CRL.A. 1432/2014 SHRIKANT @ APPU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Bharat Sharma with Ms.Sonika, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1437/2014 RAJENDER PRASAD @ SHALU ..... ...
M/S Trig Detective Security Private Ltd vs.shrikant Upadhayay
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$-24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 1869/2018 M/S TRIG DETECTIVE SECURITY PRIVATE LTD Through: Mr.Anil Kumar Advocate. ........ Petitioner Chandel, versus ..... Respondent SHRIKANT UPADHAYAY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Through: Nemo. VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 7775/2018 (exemption) Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) 1869/2018 & CM APPL. 7774/2018 (for stay) 1. Challenge in this writ petition filed under Article 226 read with 227 of the Constitution of India is the Award dated 19.01.2016 in the case vide LIR No.72/2014 on a reference being made by Government of NCT of Delhi under Section 10(1) (c) and 12 (5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short I.D. Act) specifying the terms of the reference as Whether services of Sh.Shrikant Upadhyay S/o Sh. Ratikant Upadhyay have been W.P (C) 1869/2018 Page 1 of 7 terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the managemen...
Azad Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:27. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2657/2017 AZAD SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhagwat Pershad Gupta, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: Ms. L&B/LAC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to their 2/3rd share in land bearing Khasra No.'s 118 (2-01), 123 (4-8), 134 (3-10), total measuring 09 Bigha 19 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Behlolpur, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation a...
Ascot Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs.assistant Provident Fund Commissio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:23. 02.2018 Date of Judgment:27. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 5290/2015 ASCOT HOTELS & RESORTS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K. Gupta, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arvind Kumar Verma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India is the order dated 09.10.2014 of the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short Tribunal) in Appeal No.ATA-967(04)2014 vide which the Tribunal has stayed the orders dated 30.07.2014, 28.08.2014 and 02.09.2014 impugned before it passed by the respondent subject to deposit of the amount mentioned in the order passed under Section 7-Q of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short EPF Act) along with an additional amount of Rs.20,00,000/- within four weeks and the respondent was direc...
Stadtmueller Gabriele vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~44 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:27. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1896/2017 & CM Nos.7867-69/2018 STADTMUELLER GABRIELE ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey and Mr. Manmohan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Adv. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM Nos.7867-68/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed,subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1896/2018 & CM No.7869/2018 2. Issue notice. Ms. Monika Arora accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.3. In view of the order that I propose to pass, counsel for the respondents says that no counter affidavit will be necessary and that she will argue the matter on the basis of the record. W.P.(C) 3926/2017 Page 1 of 4 4. By virtue of this writ petition, challenge has been laid by the petitioner to the order dated 21.12.2017, passed by the Joint Secretary, (Foreigners Division, Ministry of Home Affairs) Gover...
Rajender Prasad @ Shalu vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~6-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1310/2014 SURENDER @ DHEERAJ ..... Appellant Decided on:27. h February, 2018 STATE versus Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1327/2014 SUBRAMANYAN RAJA ..... Appellant STATE versus Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1340/2014 AMIT @ BUNTY ..... Appellant STATE NEERAJ STATE Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent versus CRL.A. 1366/2014 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate. Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent versus + + + Crl A1310of 2014 and batchmatters Page 1 of 55 + + + + + CRL.A. 1432/2014 SHRIKANT @ APPU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Bharat Sharma with Ms.Sonika, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1437/2014 RAJENDER PRASAD @ SHALU ..... ...
Rajiv Gaur & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:27. 2.2018 + W.P.(C) 1851/2018 & CM No.7722/2018 (stay) RAJIV GAUR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Syed Asif Iqbal and Mr. Parmesh Bali, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ....Respondents Through Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Suraj Kumar, Adv. for R-1/UOI. CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Shukla accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1.2. In this case, the petitioners disqualification occurred on account of the name of Shamoga Valley Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (in short SVRL) being struck off from the Register of Companies.3. It appears that the petitioners have had, in the past, disputes with other directors on the Board of SVRL, namely, W.P. (C) 1851/2018 Page 1 of 3 Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Mr. Sanjay Chaudhary and Mr. Naresh Thakur and his wife. Though the disputes appeared to have been settled qua these persons, I am informed that the petitioners did no...
National Highway Authority of India vs.transstroy (India) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:18. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h February, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 459/2017 & IA No.15509/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through : Mr.Sanjay ........ Petitioner Jain, ASG with Mr.Ashok C. Parkash Malhotra, Mr.C.S.Chauhan and Ms.Rajul Jain, Advs. versus TRANSSTROY (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bina Gupta and Ms.Surbhi Kapoor, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition is under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (herein after referred as Act) for setting aside the arbitral award passed on 15.09.2017.2. The brief facts of the case are as under:-"a) While passing an impugned interim award, the learned Arbitral Tribunal ignored the fact that Section 23 was amended to insert Sub-Section 2A to enable the... Petitioner to file its counterclaim against the Claimant O.M.P.(COMM.) 459/2017 Page 1 of 16 (Respondent herein), i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »