Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anu vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment 07th February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10959/2015 RAMA SHANKAR KHEMKA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha and Ms.Worthing Kasar, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Gauri and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Chaturvedi Advocates for DDA. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.1283 Min admeasuring 1 Bigha, situated in the revenue estate of Village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, New Delhi-110070 (hereinafter referred to as Subj...
Shri Rampal vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~46 * + W.P.(C) 10001/2017 SHRI RAMPAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:7. h February, 2018 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar with Mr. Akshita Versus Chhatwal, Advoctaes. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of the petitioner to the extent of share falling in Khasra No.269, measuring 4 Bigha 12. 5 Biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Jasola, New Delhi-110025 (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilit...
Vishal vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~26 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:07. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 1162/2018 VISHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Chandni Sadana, Advocate with Mr.Onkar Singh and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the impugned Award dated 29.06.2012 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court-I, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Industrial Adjudicator) in ID Case No.8/2011 answering the reference against him.2. On an advance copy having been served, Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate appears for the respondent/management.3. There is absolutely no plausible explanation offered by the petitioner for the exorbitant and abnormal delay of more than W.P (C)...
Trimax It Infrastructure & Services Ltd. Vs.kalakriti Interiors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :7. h February 2018 + RFA8362015 TRIMAX IT INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Arora, Advocate. (M:9717949628) versus KALAKRITI INTERIORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajan Chaudhary, Advocate. (M:9312052152) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal against the impugned judgment and decree dated 28th August, 2015 by which the suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter Plaintiff) has been decreed for the principal amount of Rs.7,12,096/- along with interest @ 12% per annum.2. The suit was filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter, CPC). The Plaintiff was a sub-contractor of the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter Defendant) for the project in the name of Himachal Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd. (HPSCBL) at Shimla. It is the Plaintiffs case that he has executed the entire work which was to be undertaken without any c...
Kunwar Pal Singh & Anr. Vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation (Hq) & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: February 07, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1150/2018 1. KUNWAR PAL SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Kusum Lata Sharma, Mr. Karanveer Sharma & Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocates with petitioner No.1 in person Versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (HQ) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Standing Counsel for EDMC & Ms. Punam Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Addl. Standing Cousnel (Civil) for GNCTD & Mr. Zahid Hanief, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL In this petition, release of salary due since October, 2017 is sought by petitioners, who claim that they are working in East Delhi Municipal Corporation School, Mandoli, Delhi and East Delhi Municipal Corporation School, Nand Vihar, Janta Flats, Delhi, functioning under first respondent. It is submitted that Nagar Nigam Shikshak Sangh & Ors. have filed O.A. No.4717/2015 against first respondent fo...
Aditya Narayan Yadav vs.aggarwal Plastics & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:07. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 2228/2011 ADITYA NARAYAN YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Raj Kumar Advocate. Bhartiya, versus AGGARWAL PLASTICS & OTHER Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the award dated 16.07.2010 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XVII, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Industrial Adjudicator) in Direct Industrial Dispute No.1193A/06 by which the claim of the petitioner was dismissed for want of jural relationship of employer and employee between the parties.2. It was the case of the petitioner/workman that he was working with the respondent/management as a driver since 1989 and his last drawn salary was Rs.4,000/- per month. He pleaded that the respondent had its business at 1066...
Amandeep Singh Johar vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~40 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7608/2017 % Date of decision :7. h February, 2018 AMANDEEP SINGH JOHAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Nikhil Borwankar, Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Mr. David Vijay Thomas, Mr. Vikram Singh Kushwaha and Mr. Kaushik Barua, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Satyakam, ASC-GNCTD and Ms. Sneh Suman, Mr. Vidur Mohan and Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner who claims that he, alongwith his parents and relatives, has faced proceedings before the W.P.(C)No.7608/2017 Page 1 of 15 Crime Against Women Cell, Nanak Pura, New Delhi at the instance of his wife. It is complained that despite regularly attending all sessions fixed at this Ce...
Harpal Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :07. h FEBRUARY, 2018 HARPAL SINGH CRL.A. 1054/2015 Through : Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. ..... Appellant STATE versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 22.04.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.59/1/12 arising out of FIR No.58/2012 at PS Rani Bagh whereby Harpal Singh - the appellant was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. By an order dated 28.04.2015, the appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine `10,000/-.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge-sheet is that on 19.02.2012 at about 07.30 p.m. at 642, Ground Floor, Rishi Nagar, Delhi (Saya Beauty Parlour), the appellant committed murder of his wife Jaspreet Kaur by inflicting injuries on her body. Th...
Oriental Foundry Pvt Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 76/2018 & CM APPL. 338-339/2018 ORIENTAL FOUNDRY PVT LTD. Date of Decision:07. 02.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj K Singh with Ms. Tanuka De, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Jain, Sr. Panel Counsel, Ministry of Railways with Ms. Prabhleen Kaur, Mr. Tanpreet Singh and Ms. Parul Jagota, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) * 1. The petitioners grievance is that it had applied for/furnished its bid pursuant to a tender floated by the respondent-Railways (hereinafter referred to as Railways), inviting bids for the manufacture of Railway wagons. The notice inviting tender (NIT) has started operation of the procurement to be sourced on developmental orders. These lots were 500 wagons, two out of 500 wagons totalling 1000.2. The petitioner claims that its facility was inspected by the Research Designs ...
Jagan Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment 07th February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10330/2015 JAGAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Oberoi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate LAC/L&B. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit is handed over by learned counsel for the LAC in Court today. Copy supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Counter affidavit is taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Act of 1894 with respect to the land of the peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »