Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Company Ltd vs.poonam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 130/2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ravinder Singh, Advocate and Mr.Raveesha Gupta, Advocate versus POONAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus POONAM & ANR + MAC.APP. 537/2016 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ravinder Singh, Advocate and Mr.Raveesha Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL Mac.App.Nos.130/2014 & 537/2016 Page 1 1. The above captioned two appeals are directed against common impugned award of 19th December, 2013 vide which compensation of `19,76,776/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been granted to claimants on account of death of Akhil Bhardwaj aged 20 years in a vehicular accident on 4th August, 2011. The facts are already noticed in the impugned award and so ne...
Rama Shankar Khemka vs.government of National Capital Territory of Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment 07th February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10959/2015 RAMA SHANKAR KHEMKA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha and Ms.Worthing Kasar, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Gauri and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Chaturvedi Advocates for DDA. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.1283 Min admeasuring 1 Bigha, situated in the revenue estate of Village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, New Delhi-110070 (hereinafter referred to as Subj...
Sunita vs.lekh Raj Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + SUNITA Date of decision:7. h February, 2018 CS(OS) 50/2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht and Mr. Manashwy Jha, Advs. LEKH RAJ ORS Versus ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has sued for partition of property No.W-121, Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi-110065 impleading her brother Lekh Raj as defendant No.1, Nirmala Devi as defendant No.2, Gulshan Khanna as defendant No.3, Harish as defendant No.4 and Anoop as defendant No.5.2. It is the case of the plaintiff (i) that the aforesaid property was owned by Bhagwan Dass who died on 1st January, 1987; (ii) that the plaintiff is the daughter of Om Prakash, brother of Bhagwan Dass; (iii) that Bhagwan Dass, besides the father of the plaintiff had three other brothers namely Ghamandi Lal, Harnam Dass and Ravi Prakash; (iv) that the defendant No.2 Nirmala Devi is the daughter of Ghamandi Lal; (v) t...
M/S Nj Constrution (Through Its Proprietor) vs.ayursundra Health Care ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. 02. 2018 Pronounced on:07. 02.2018 ARB.P. 529/2017 M/S NJ CONSTRUTION (THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR) Through : Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, ........ Petitioner Senior Advocate with MR.Anshum Jain, Mr.Amol Sinha, Mr.Naveen Kumar, Advocates. versus AYURSUNDRA HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through : Mr. Manish Goswami, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The respondent No.1 floated a notice inviting Tender inter alia for the civil and electrical work of Super Specialty Hospital, wherein several bids were invited. The hospital was to be constructed at Guwahati. The petitioner also participated and was awarded the said work order on 22.06.2013 at the mutually agreed amount of Rs 33,38,76,000/-. The LOI was issued by respondent no.1 for the said work. ARB.P.529/2017 Page 1 of 8 % + 2. On 05.07.2013, an Article of Agreement was entered into containing the special conditions of the Contract, Spec...
Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari vs.kamini Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + KAMLESH KUMAR TIWARI CRL.REV.P.27/2017 Judgment delivered on:07. 02.2018 ........ Petitioner KAMINI TIWARI Versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr M.Hasibuddin Mr S.K.Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0702.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.491/207(delay in re-filing the petition for 37 days) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay in re-filing the petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of accordingly. CRL.REV.P.27/2017 & Crl.M.A.489/2017(stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 31.08.2016, whereby two Appeals; one filed by the petitioner and the other filed by the Crl.REV.P.27/2017 Page 1 of 5 respondent, were disposed of. Both parties had filed an Appeal against the order dated 11.04.2016 of the Metropolitan Magistrate.2. By an order dated 23.12.2014, interim maintenance was ...
Ex. Constable (Driver) Shayam Sunder vs.lt. Governer (Govt. Of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1154/2018 & C.M. 4837-38-39/2018 1. EX. CONSTABLE (DRIVER) SHAYAM SUNDER ...... Petitioner Through: Ms. Poonam Mahajan, Advocate Versus LT. GOVERNER (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner was working as Constable (Driver) with Delhi Police and due to a criminal case [u/s 406/498A IPC]. registered against him, he was dismissed from service in the year 1998. It is not in dispute that dismissal of petitioner from service was consequent upon a departmental inquiry.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has been acquitted in the criminal case on 18th April, 2012 and has also obtained divorce from his wife and thereafter, had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi but had withdrawn the Original Application. It is so evident from order of 9th November, 2017.3. It is evident fro...
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.home Cable Network Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~OS-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:07. 02.2018 CS(COMM) 273/2018 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. K. K.Khetan, Adv. versus HOME CABLE NETWORK PVT LTD Ex parte. Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking an order of permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, their officers, agents, etc. from recording, distributing, broadcasting, etc. or in any manner exploiting the cinematograph films, sound recordings, literary works and musical works or any other work or any part thereof that is owned by the plaintiff including all works whereon the plaintiff has shown its copyright under Section 52A of the Copyright Act. Other connected reliefs are sought.2. The plaintiff claims itself to be one of the largest and most reputed music companies in the country. It has been engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing audio-casset...
Nand Kishore & Anr vs.the Banking Ombudsman, New Delhi (I) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:7. February, 2018 W.P. (C) 1137/2018 NAND KISHORE & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Apoorv Kurup with Ms. Isha Mittal, Advocates. versus THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN, NEW DELHI (I) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Parihar with Mr. H.S. Parihar, Advocates for RBI. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL)1) Issue notice. Mr. K.S. Parihar, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.2/RBI. Mr. Parihar says he does not wish to file a counter affidavit. 1.1) In view of the order I propose to pass, notice need not to be issued to respondent No.1, 3 and 4.2) There are two substantive prayers, which are sought for, in the instant writ petition. Via the first prayer, the petitioners seek issuance of a direction to the RBI to ensure expeditious disposal of the complaint dated 29.9.2017, filed with the WP.(C) 1137/2018 Page 1 of 3 respondent no.1/Banking Ombudsman. The second prayer, which ...
Shri Satya Dev Singh Bidhuri vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9997/2017 SHRI SATYA DEV SINGH BIDHURI ........ Petitioner Date of Judgment :7th February, 2018 Through Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate. versus CORAM: GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Mr. Jain, counsel for LAC has handed over the counter affidavit in Court, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to counsel for the petitioner.2. With consent of both the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of petitioner comprised in Khasra nos.7/22, 7/2and 28/1admeasuirng 522 sq. yds. out of...
Poonam & Anr vs.new India Assurance Co Ltd & Ors (New India Assurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 07, 2018 + MAC.APP. 130/2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ravinder Singh, Advocate and Mr.Raveesha Gupta, Advocate versus POONAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus POONAM & ANR + MAC.APP. 537/2016 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ravinder Singh, Advocate and Mr.Raveesha Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL Mac.App.Nos.130/2014 & 537/2016 Page 1 1. The above captioned two appeals are directed against common impugned award of 19th December, 2013 vide which compensation of `19,76,776/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been granted to claimants on account of death of Akhil Bhardwaj aged 20 years in a vehicular accident on 4th August, 2011. The facts are already noticed in the impugned award and so ne...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »