Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shyam Bati & Anr. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 02.2018 FAO3162017 SHYAM BATI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ajit Rajput and Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Suvira Lal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns the order dated 25.11.2016 of the Railway 1. Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi declining the appellants claim for compensation, which was sought on account of the demise of one Rajvir in a train accident on 21.12.2014.2. The appellants, i.e. the widow and daughter of the deceased Rajvir, had claimed that the latter was travelling in a train from Inchhapuri to Delhi alongwith Rahul, a three year old boy. He had a valid ticket bearing No.73272 for Rs.11/-, which is not disputed by the respondent/Railways. It is alleged that due to heavy rush inside the train compartment, a sudden jerk from inside the compartment resulted in the falling of t...
Dena Bank vs.kamlesh Rani (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :2. d February, 2018 Date of decision :8th February, 2018 + RFA5292017 DENA BANK Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant KAMLESH RANI (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS. Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 This is an appeal arising out of the impugned judgment dated 26th December, 2016 by which the suit for possession and mesne profits has been decreed in the following terms. In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for recovery on the following amounts:-"(i) Mesne profits for the period 1.1.2008 till the handing over of the actual possession of the suit property i.e. 25.3.2013 @ Rs. 1,75,000/- p.m. (ii) The Defendant shall be entitled to adjust the amount already paid to the Plaintiff in terms of the order dated 02.09.2013. (iii) The plaintiff shall also be entitled to interest ...
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-21 vs.m/s Mehta Construction Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~16 to 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:08. 02.2018 + ITA3142016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-21 M/S MEHTA CONSTRUCTION CO. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA3152016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 M/S MEHTA CONSTRUCTION CO. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA3162016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-21 M/S MEHTA CONSTRUCTION CO. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA3172016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-21 M/S MEHTA CONSTRUCTION CO. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior Standing Counsel for Revenue. Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms.Rubal Maini, Mr. Rajesh Mahna, Mr.Achin Mittal, Mr.Vikram Kakkar, Advocates. ITA3142016 & connected appeals Page 1 of 9 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % Admit.1. The common question of law ur...
Liugong India Pvt Ltd vs.yograj Infrastructure Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h February, 2018. CS(OS) 3318/2012 LIUGONG INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Adv. versus YOGRAJ INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ORS ....Defendants Through: Mr. Faisal Zafar, Adil Khan and Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advs. For D-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of principal amount of Rs.1,03,50,000/-, being the unpaid price of the machinery supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant no.1 and of which defendants no.2 to 4 namely Yogendra Singh, Ritu Singh and Ram Lal Jharia are described in the memo of parties and in the plaint as Directors. The plaintiff, in accordance with the clause on the invoices raised on the defendant no.1, has also claimed interest @ 24% per annum for the period prior to the institution of the suit, from the date of the invoices till the date of institution of the suit. Hence the suit for recovery of Rs.1,56,48,380/- with...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Iv vs.gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
ITA9352009 Date of Decision:08. 02.2018 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI IV .... Appellant GEE KAY FINANCE & LEASING CO. LTD. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Adv. versus Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta with Ms. Somil Agarwal, Ms. Monika Ghai & Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The question of law framed for this appeal on 09.10.2009 is as follows: 1. Whether ITAT was correct in law in holding that the notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Act beyond the 04 years after the end of relevant assessment year was bad in law as of Chief Commissioner or Commissioner of Income Tax as per the provisions of Section 151 (1) of the Act had not been obtained by the Assessing Officer?. necessary approval the ITA No.935/2009 Page 1 of 9 2. The facts in brief are: The assessees return declared a loss, filed on 25.11.1997 was process...
Harijan-Pichhara Varg Avam Gram Sudhar Samiti (Regd.) & Ors. Vs.the Go ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision-08.02.2018 + W.P.(C) 875/2018 & C.M.No.3717/2018(for exemption) HARIJAN-PICHHARA VARG AVAM GRAM SUDHAR SAMITI (REGD.) & ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.R.K.Bachchan, Advocate. versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates for R- 1,2,3,6&7. Mr.Arun Birbal with Mr.Sanjay Singh & Mr.Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel with Mr.Virendra Singh, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J(ORAL) 1. The two... Petitioners, claiming to be Registered Societies formed for the protection of rights and upliftment of the people belonging to Dalit society and backward classes coming from very poor strata, have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to carry out demarcation in Khasra No.64,65,66,294/67,295/67,296/68,...
Nitin Dabas vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h January, 2018 Decided on:8. h February, 2018 + CRL.A.568/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 964/2017 RAKESH alias SONU ...Appellant Through:Mr.Dinesh Malik, Advocate with Mr.Akash Saini and Mr.Manish Malik, Advocates versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Naveen, PS-Kanjhawala THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + NITIN DABAS CRL.A.629/2017 ...Appellant Through:Mr.Ashok Chhikara, Advocate with Mr.Anuj Malik and Ms.Arpan Kumari, Advocates STATE versus + KAPIL alias SUNNY... RESPONDENTThrough:Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Naveen, PS-Kanjhawala CRL.A.635/2017 ...Appellant Through:Mr.Ajay Kumar Pipaniya, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Pipaniya, Mr.Rohit Arora, Ms.Mahima Chaudhary and Mr.Yogesh Sharma, Advocates Crl. Appeal Nos.568/2017, 629/2017 & 635/2017 Page 1 of 30 versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State... RESPONDENT% Dr. S. Muralidhar, ...
M/S Crocs inc.usa vs.m/s Liberty Shoes Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
* + + + + + + + + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) No.772/2016 CS(COMM) No.570/2017 CS(COMM) No.571/2017 CS(COMM) No.780/2017 CS(OS) No.2850/2014 CS(OS) No.64/2016 CS (COMM) No.52/2018 CS (COMM) No.53/2018 8th February, 2018 CS (COMM) No.772/2016 M/s CROCS INC.USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Shukla, Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Ms. Tanvi Mishra Advocates. versus M/s LIBERTY SHOES LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Devyani Nath, Mr. Shubhankar, Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advocates for D-1. + CS(COMM) No.570/2017 M/s CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Shukla, Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Ms. Tanvi Mishra Advocates. CS (COMM) No.772/2016 and connected cases Page 1 of 54 versus M/s RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD. Through: None. ..... Defendant + CS(COMM) No.571/2017 M/s CROCS INC. USA ...
Land & Building Department vs.prem Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6192/2017 and CM No.25760/2017 LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates. versus Through: Mr Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate. PREM CHAND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0802.2018 ..... Respondent VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the 1. orders dated 28.05.2015, 16.03.2016, 22.04.2016 and 06.07.2016 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter the CIC) in Second Appeal No.CIC/SA/A/2015/000037 preferred by the respondent under Section 19 (3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the RTI Act). By the order dated 28.05.2015, the CIC had called upon the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the petitioner to show cause why the maximum penalty under the RTI Act should not be imposed. The PIO was further called upon to also show cause why ...
Rakesh Alias Sonu vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h January, 2018 Decided on:8. h February, 2018 + CRL.A.568/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 964/2017 RAKESH alias SONU ...Appellant Through:Mr.Dinesh Malik, Advocate with Mr.Akash Saini and Mr.Manish Malik, Advocates versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Naveen, PS-Kanjhawala THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + NITIN DABAS CRL.A.629/2017 ...Appellant Through:Mr.Ashok Chhikara, Advocate with Mr.Anuj Malik and Ms.Arpan Kumari, Advocates STATE versus + KAPIL alias SUNNY... RESPONDENTThrough:Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Naveen, PS-Kanjhawala CRL.A.635/2017 ...Appellant Through:Mr.Ajay Kumar Pipaniya, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Pipaniya, Mr.Rohit Arora, Ms.Mahima Chaudhary and Mr.Yogesh Sharma, Advocates Crl. Appeal Nos.568/2017, 629/2017 & 635/2017 Page 1 of 30 versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State... RESPONDENT% Dr. S. Muralidhar, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »