Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Mehta vs.general Manager, Northern Railway
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h February, 2018 + O.M.P. (T)(COMM ) 87/2017 ANIL MEHTA Through: Mr.Avinash Trivedi, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Himanshu Upadhyay, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking termination of the mandate of Arbitral Tribunal constituted on 19.09.2014 and to appoint a substitute Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the work of Misc work between Samrala to Sanehwal stations in connection with Chandigarh Ludhiana new B.G. Rail Link Project awarded by the respondent in favour of the petitioner vide Acceptance Letter dated 29-08-2011 and a formal contract agreement No.84W/Dy.CE/Const-II/CDG dated 11-11-2011.2. The counse...
Sonam Lhanzom vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:9. 2.2018 W.P. (C) 1021/2018, CM APPL.4303/2018 SONAM LHANZOM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney with Mr. Sidhant Krishan Singh, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition, whereby a direction is sought qua the Court respondents for issuance of passport to the petitioner in the background of the following brief facts:2. The petitioner, who is of Tibetan origin was born in Lobarsing, Gajapati, Odhisha on 10.04.1998. Her mother, one, Mrs. Tenzing Tsephell was born in the same place, albeit, on 22.4.1979. 2.1 The petitioner was issued a registration certificate/residential permit on 11.5.2017 by the Superintendent of Police & Foreigners Registration Officer, Gajapati, Odisha, India. W.P.(C) 1021/2018 Page 1 of 6 3. The petitioner, in these cir...
Max New York Life Insurance Co. Ltd vs.vighnaharta Direct Insurance Br ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 663/2016 MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Piyush Singhal and Mr. Altamish Siddiki, Advs. Versus $~22 * + VIGHNAHARTA DIRECT INSURANCE BROKING PVT LTD Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Defendant ORDER0802.2018 Yesterday, the following order was passed: % 1. 1. The plaintiff instituted this suit, under Section XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for recovery of Rs.7,94,42,409/-.2. The defendant applied for leave to defend. Vide order dated 30th July, 2014, with the consent of the counsel for the plaintiff, the suit was ordered to be treated as an ordinary suit and pleadings ordered to be completed. On 16th March, 2016, the following issues were framed in the suit and the parties relegated to trial: (i) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the suit amount from the defendant or any other amount?. (ii) Whether plaintiff is entitled...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs.m/s Mehta Construction Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~16 to 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:08. 02.2018 ITA3142016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-21..... Appellant M/S MEHTA CONSTRUCTION CO. ..... Respondent versus + And connected matters: + + + ITA3152016 ITA3162016 ITA3172016 Present: Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr. Deepak Anand, Junior Standing Counsel for Revenue. Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms.Rubal Maini, Mr. Rajesh Mahna, Mr.Achin Mittal, Mr.Vikram Kakkar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % The appeals are partly allowed. For detailed decision, the judgment dated 08.02.2018 in ITA3142016 1.2. may be referred to. FEBRUARY08 2018/j S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J VINOD GOEL, J ITA3142016 & connected appeals Page 1 of 1...
Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd vs.aruna Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 02.2018 FAO912017 & CM APPL. 7158/2017 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rudra Kahlon, Advocate. versus ARUNA DEVI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh and Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) CM APPL. 7160/2017 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 61 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the cost of Rs. 3,000/- to be paid to the respondent. The application is disposed-off. FAO912017 & CM APPL. 7158/2017 1. This appeal impugns the compensation award passed on 17.10.2016 by the Commissioner Employees' Compensation, North West District, New Delhi awarding an amount of Rs. Rs.8,31,920/- along with simple interest @ 12% per annum w.e.f 03.02.2014 till the date of regularization. This amount has been deposited in the Court. The grounds of challenge are that:-"i) the appellant/ins...
Kapil Alias Sunny vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h January, 2018 Decided on:8. h February, 2018 + CRL.A.568/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 964/2017 RAKESH alias SONU ...Appellant Through:Mr.Dinesh Malik, Advocate with Mr.Akash Saini and Mr.Manish Malik, Advocates versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Naveen, PS-Kanjhawala THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + NITIN DABAS CRL.A.629/2017 ...Appellant Through:Mr.Ashok Chhikara, Advocate with Mr.Anuj Malik and Ms.Arpan Kumari, Advocates STATE versus + KAPIL alias SUNNY... RESPONDENTThrough:Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Naveen, PS-Kanjhawala CRL.A.635/2017 ...Appellant Through:Mr.Ajay Kumar Pipaniya, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Pipaniya, Mr.Rohit Arora, Ms.Mahima Chaudhary and Mr.Yogesh Sharma, Advocates Crl. Appeal Nos.568/2017, 629/2017 & 635/2017 Page 1 of 30 versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State... RESPONDENT% Dr. S. Muralidhar, ...
Bijender vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 222/2002 BIJENDER STATE Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % ORDER0802.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal directed against a judgment dated 1st September 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.15/1999 arising out of FIR No.982/1998 registered at Police Station (PS) Rajouri Garden convicting the Appellant of the offence under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife, Kanta. The appeal also impugns the order on sentence dated 3rd September, 2002 whereby he was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.2,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. Case of the prosecution 2. At around 10.25 am in the morning of 1st November 1998, information was received in t...
Indus Towers Ltd vs.sheela Calicotey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h February 2018 INDUS TOWERS LTD RFA8522016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (M- 9811074162). versus SHEELA CALICOTEY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Gohri, Advocate (M- 9711455398). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J (Oral) RFA8522016 & CM APPLs.40432/2016, 23087/2017 This is an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 13th July, 1. 2016 by which the Trial Court has decreed the suit for damages in favour of the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff).2. The brief facts are that the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) and the Plaintiff entered into lease deed (Ex. PW-1/1) dated 23rd September, 2008 by which the Defendant took on lease the roof top area of the property of the Plaintiff bearing No.C-115, Old Nangala Raya, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi (hereinafter `suit property'). The relevant clauses of the lease are set out herein below: 2.1 This Agreement is for ...
Mukesh Kumar vs.maan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1019/2017 and C.M. No.4954/2018 (stay) 8th February, 2018 + % MUKESH KUMAR Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent MAAN SINGH CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Respondent is served. No one is present for the respondent in spite of the matter having been called out for the second time.2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the Trial Court dated 8.9.2017 by which trial court has refused to condone the delay in filing of the appearance under Order XXXVII CPC and has decreed the suit. The delay in filing the appearance is of approximately 60 days. RFA No.1019/2017 Page 1 of 3 3. Facts of the present case are that the appellant/defendant pleaded that he was served with summons of the suit under Order XXXVII CPC through his wife on 21.1.2017, however, since the...
Y N Bhargava vs.assocham
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2018
# 14 to 17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI14+ 15 + 16 + 17 + FAO(OS) 210/2016 Y N BHARGAVA versus Judgment delivered on:08. 02.2018 ..... Appellant ASSOCHAM ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 211/2016 Y N BHARGAVA versus ..... Appellant ASSOCHAM ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 214/2016 Y N BHARGAVA versus ASSOCHAM FAO(OS) 215/2016 Y N BHARGAVA Versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ASSOCHAM ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 210/2016, 211/2016, 214/2016, 215/2016 Page 1 of 4 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. N.S. Vasisht, Advocate with Mr. Vishal Singh and Ms. Jyoti Kataria, Advocates : Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Aswathy Menon and Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeals assail a common order dated 02.06.2016, whereby, the learned Single Judge disposed of IA No.4696/2016 under Order VII Rule 14(3) read with Sect...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »