Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sonam Tashi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:9. 2.2018 W.P. (C) 1023/2018, CM APPL.4304/2018 SONAM TASHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney with Mr. Sidhant Krishan Singh, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition, whereby a direction is sought qua the Court respondents for issuance of passport to the petitioner in the background of the following brief facts:2. The petitioner, who is of Tibetan origin was born in Lobarsing, Gajapati, Odhisha on 11.08.1987. His mother, one, Nyima Youdon, was born in the same place, albeit, on 22.3.1962. 2.1 The petitioner was issued a registration certificate/residential permit on 25.4.2006 by the Superintendent of Police & Foreigners Registration Officer, Gajapati, Odisha, India. W.P.(C) 1023/2018 Page 1 of 6 3. The petitioner, in these circumstances...
Devanand @ Deva vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRAHLAD STATE CRL.A.1000/2017 Reserved on: January 09, 2018 Decided on: February 09, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhruva Bhagat with Mrs. Ashna Bhagat, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A.1104/2017 & CRL.M (B) 2140/2017 DEVANAND @ DEVA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhad Qayam, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 20th July 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 West, Delhi Crl. A. 1000/2017 & 1104/2017 Page 1 of 24 (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.56739 of 2016 arising out of FIR No.477 of 2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Khyala convicting the Appellants, Prahlad and Devanand @ Deva, for the offence under Sections 302 read with Section 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 31st July 2017 whereby bo...
Naresh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :07. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on :09.02.2018 + CRL.A. 549/2011 NARESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.D. Chauhan, Adv with appellant STATE in person versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms Neelam Sharma, APP with SI Anupama Rathi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. This appeal has impugned the judgment and order on sentence dated 25.03.2011 and 26.03.2011 respectively wherein the appellant stood convicted under Section 376 r/w Section 511 IPC as also for the second offence under Section 506 IPC; for his first conviction he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of one month; for his second conviction, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a CRL A. 549/2011 Page 1 of 12 period of one year. Both the sentences were to run concurrently; benefit of Section 428 of the Cr...
Meena Rastogi vs.central Board of Direct Taxes, & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1219/2018, CM Nos.5050-5051/2018 Date of decision:9. h February, 2018. MEENA RASTOGI Through Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, & ANR. Through Ms. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Writ petitioner Meena Rastogi is wife of Dal Chandra Rastogi and mother of Siddharth Rastogi.2. Dal Chandra Rastogi and Siddharth Rastogi had filed Writ Petitions for identical and similar relief, i.e., for extension of time for payment of third or last installment on the undisclosed income under the Income Declaration Scheme Rules, 2016, introduced vide Finance Act, 2016. By common order dated 5th February, 2018, we have dismissed W.P.(C) 1069/2018 filed by Siddharth Rastogi and W.P.(C) 1070/2018 filed by Dal Chandra Rastogi. The present writ petition would also meet the same fate. WP(C) No.1219/201...
Satish Kumar Batra vs.harish Kumar Batra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :18. h January 2018 Date of decision :9th February, 2018 RFA7762016 & CM APPLs. 36696/2016 (Stay), 12784/2017 SATISH KUMAR BATRA Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate. versus (M-9811196574) ..... Appellant HARISH KUMAR BATRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Advocates (M-9013980691) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 Late Shri Jiwan Dass Batra and Smt. Krishna Batra are the parents of the Appellant and the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2. Harish Kumar Batra/Respondent No.1/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) filed a suit for declaration, permanent injunction and in alternate, for partition and possession against his brothers Devender Kumar Batra/Respondent No.2/Defendant No.1 (hereinafter, D1), Satish Kumar Batra/Appellant/Defendant No.2 (hereinafter, D2) and Sabina Maini/Respondent No.3/Defendant No.3 (hereinafter, D3).2. Father of t...
Prahlad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRAHLAD STATE CRL.A.1000/2017 Reserved on: January 09, 2018 Decided on: February 09, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhruva Bhagat with Mrs. Ashna Bhagat, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A.1104/2017 & CRL.M (B) 2140/2017 DEVANAND @ DEVA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhad Qayam, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 20th July 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 West, Delhi Crl. A. 1000/2017 & 1104/2017 Page 1 of 24 (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.56739 of 2016 arising out of FIR No.477 of 2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Khyala convicting the Appellants, Prahlad and Devanand @ Deva, for the offence under Sections 302 read with Section 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 31st July 2017 whereby bo...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs.pavitra Commercial Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~11, 14 & 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 02.2018 ITA1462018 & CM APPL. 5059/2018 ITA1492018 ITA1502018 & CM APPL. 5080/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. versus + ..... Respondent Through None. PAVITRA COMMERCIAL LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % In these appeals, the questions of law urged for various years are, as follows :1. Whether the decision of the ITAT affirming the Appellate Commissioners view with respect to the assessees claim of capital gain rather than business income as held by the Assessing Officer is justified?.2) Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that under the mercantile system of accounting, interest income accrued on basis of the assessees contention that recovery as well as interest (on such deposits) is doubtful?. ITA1462018 & connected appeals Page 1 of 6 2. On the first q...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mahima Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~44 * % + MAC.APP8412017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h February, 2018 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K.Tyagi, Advocates versus MAHIMA SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Chandrani Prasad and Mr.Tarun, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award dated 18th July, 2017 whereby compensation of Rs.54,87,500/- has been awarded to respondent No.1 to 3.2. On 29th September, 2015, late Anil Singh was going in car bearing No.DL-3CAQ-6360 to Kanpur. When the car reached Sarai Tiraha on National Highway-2, a gas tanker bearing No.HR-55M-0679 going ahead of the car, applied sudden breaks due to which the car collided with the tanker from behind which resulted in the death of Anil Singh and Jitu. The police registered FIR No.518/2015, P.S. Civil Lines, District Ritawa under Sections 279/338/304-A IPC against the driver of the tanker. Anil Singh was survived by his...
Aarushi Goyal vs.central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision-09.02.2018 + W.P.(C) 8552/2017 & C.M.No.35212/2017(interim direction) AARUSHI GOYAL CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Khagesh B.Jha, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Bansal with Ms.Seema Dolo, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J(ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner who is a commerce student having appeared in the Class XII, Board examination conducted by the respondent/CBSE in March 2017 seeks a direction to the respondent to re-evaluate her answer-sheets of Economics and English Core in a proper manner. The petitioner has also prayed for a photocopy of the re-evaluated answer-sheets after proper re- evaluation.2. The claim as set out in the petition is that when the results of the aforesaid examination were declared, she realised that she had not been given the requisite marks in the aforesaid two subjects and, therefore, she appli...
Tristar Global Infrastructure Private Limited and Ors vs.punjab Nation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2018
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:9. 2.2018 W.P. (C) 5475/2017, CM APPL.22994/2017 TRISTAR GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Nair with Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocates. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nishi Chaudhary, Advocate for PNB/Resp-1. Mr. H.S. Parihar with Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocates for RBI. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been preferred to assail a communication dated 1.6.2017, issued by the respondent no.1, i.e., Punjab National Bank (hereafter referred to as PNB). 1.1 By virtue of this communication, PNB sought to bring to the notice of the petitioners that they had availed of various facilities which in all amounted Rs.36,51,92,382.68 as on 31.08.2016. Furthermore, it also brought to the notice of the petitioner that their account maintained with PNB was declared a NPA on 30.9.2016 and t...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »