Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neeta Sarda & Ors. Vs.aditya Sarda & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :12. h February 2018 + RFA4612016 NEETA SARDA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Amit S. Chadha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashok Jain, Mr. Arjun Aggarwal, Mr. Aniket Bhattacharyya and Mr. Sahil Mangia, Advocates. (M:9873632138) ADITYA SARDA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Datta, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Mr. Shakil Ahmed and Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Advocates (M:9810386403) with R-1, 2 & 3. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) RFA4612016 1. The Court spent considerable time in hearing this matter on the last date and today. On the last date, a Local Commissioner was also appointed to report on the exact status of the property. Parties almost agreed on the terms and conditions during the course of these hearings. However, while the Court was dictating the order recording the terms of settlement, parties did not wish to give consent to the terms....
Bimlesh vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~8 to 11 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1141/2014 KALI CHARAN Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Prasanna, ..... Appellant STATE Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1143/2014 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 40/2018 SARVESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal and Ms. Pallavi STATE S. Kansal, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1314/2014 CHANDER BHAN Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary Mr.Gufran Ali, Advocates DHCLSC. ..... Appellant and for STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1320/2014 AMIT @ MANGRU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. + + + CRL.A. 1141/2014 and connected matters Page 1 of 24 + STATE BIMLESH versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 795/2014 Through: Mr. A.S. Juneja, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Koll...
Pradip Kumar Sethi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:12. h February 2018 + W.P.(C) 1270/2018 PRADIP KUMAR SETHI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora and Mr. Sanjay Saddy, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for ROC CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.5327/2018 1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1270/2018 CM No.5326/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of respondent/ROC.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue which arises in the present petition is covered by a judgment of another Single Judge of this Court, passed in W.P.(C) No.10946/2017 dated 21.12.2017, titled: Mayank Singhee vs. Union of India. W.P. (C) 1270/2018 Page 1 of 3 4. It is the petitioners case that he alongwith another person, i.e., Mr. Som Prakash Sethi was appointed as a director on the Board of a company by the name: Deep-Mala Shares...
Reliance General Insurance Company vs.kiran Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate for R-5 and R-6 versus KIRAN DEVI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : February 12, 2018 + MAC.APP. 864/2015, CM Nos.26676/2015 & 32701/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate Impugned award of 21st July, 2015 grants compensation of `13,16,896/- with interest @ 9% per annum to first four respondents- claimants on account of death of one Roopesh, S/o Umesh Chand who had suffered fatal injuries in a vehicular accident on 1st May, 2008. The breakup of the compensation granted by Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) is as under:-"Loss of dependency: Loss of love & affection:1. 2. (Rs.1 lakh each to petitioners no.1 to4) 3.4.5. Funeral expenses: Loss of estate: Loss of consortium: Total compensation: ` 8,71,896/- ` 4,00,000/- ` 25,000/- ` 10,000/- ` 10,000/-...
Datar Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10578/2015 DATAR SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :12th February, 2018 Through Mr. Sumit Bansal, Ms. Richa Oberoi versus & Mr. Prateek Banati, Advocates. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. K.K. Malviya & Mr. Sanjiv Joshi, Advocates for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of petitioner forming part of Khasra no.38(2- 09) and 399 (0-06) admeasuring 2 bighas and 15 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Neb Sarai, New Del...
Yashaswi Aggarwal and Anr. Vs.sh. Rakesh Aggarwal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~OS-7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. 02.2018 CS(OS) 1561/1994 YASHASWI AGGARWAL AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Jeevesh Nagrath and Mr.Pratham Sharma, Advs. versus SH. RAKESH AGGARWAL AND ORS.F+ ..... Defendants Through Mr.Ankit Sharma, Adv. for D-8. Mr.Lalit Gupta, Adv. for D-9 to D-13 Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manish K.Srivastava, Adv. for D-14. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH * % + JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.1899/2018 1. This application is filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. It has been pleaded in the present application that the parties to the present suit are the grandsons of late Shri Lala Manohar Lal. The suit is filed for partition of two properties in Sunder Nagar. It has also been pointed out that the original ancestor Late Shri Rai Saheb Chiranji Lal had left behind a vast estate which is said to be a joint family property which was subject matter of a suit CS(OS)387/1973 where a prelimin...
Manu Shankar vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
#28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA432018, CM No.4004/2018, CM No.4005/2018 & CM No.4006/2018 Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2018 MANU SHANKAR ..... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate : Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Advocate with Mr. Shashank Khurana, Advocate for R-1/DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal filed under Clause 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, assails an order dated 29.11.2017, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.3537/2017 titled as Manu LPA432018 Page 1 of 3 Shankar vs. Delhi Development Authority & Ors., whereby, the said petition instituted on behalf of the appellant essentially came to be dismissed on account of the circumstance that the demolition and sealing orders were passed by...
Milind Agarwal and Ors. Vs.the Institute of Chartered Accountants of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:12. h February,2018 + W.P.(C) 1107/2018 & C.M.No.4605-06/2018.1. MILIND AGARWAL AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Amit Khemka with Mr.Rishi Sehgal and Ms.Nidhi Bhuwania, Advocates. versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Agarwal, Ms.Pooja Saigal, Mr.Pulkit Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT The petitioners are students who, having appeared in the Chartered Accountants Final Examination conducted by the respondent in November 2017, are aggrieved by the result declared and published on its website by the respondent-institute wherein all of them have failed in their respective Groups. Vide the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have WP (C) No.1107/2018 Page 1 of 20 prayed for summoning of the records of the respondent includi...
Amit @ Mangru vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2018
$~8 to 11 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1141/2014 KALI CHARAN Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Prasanna, ..... Appellant STATE Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1143/2014 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 40/2018 SARVESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal and Ms. Pallavi STATE S. Kansal, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1314/2014 CHANDER BHAN Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary Mr.Gufran Ali, Advocates DHCLSC. ..... Appellant and for STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1320/2014 AMIT @ MANGRU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. + + + CRL.A. 1141/2014 and connected matters Page 1 of 24 + STATE BIMLESH versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 795/2014 Through: Mr. A.S. Juneja, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Koll...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »