Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Upl Limited vs.pradeep Sharma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 10th, 2017 Decided on: February 21, 2018 IA95852017 (u/O XXXIX R12 CPC) in CS(COMM) 556/2017 UPL LIMITED Represented by: Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with ..... Plaintiff Ms. Rajeshwari, Mr. Aditya Gupta, Mr. Tahir A.J., Mr. Kumar Chitranshu, Advs. versus PRADEEP SHARMA & ANR ..... Defendants Represented by: Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Avinash K. Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The plaintiff which is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, weedicides, fumigant, PGR and rodenticides claims that it is the owner of the patent IN20613 (in short IN130, IN19422 (in short IN225 and IN24455 (in short IN551. In the present suit, the claim of the plaintiff is infringement of its three patents and seeks an order of interim injunction in its favour pending hearing of the suit.2. IN225titled a process of preparing a chemically stable synergistic herbicidal composition is a ...
Ajay Kumar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:21. t February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3911/2017 AJAY KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.B.S.Maan, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, standing counsel for DDA with Mr.Hem Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. On the last date of hearing, Mr.B.S.Maan, learned counsel for the petitioners had made the following statement: the petitioners confine their relief only to the land comprised in Khasra no.283(5-15), 284(1-18) and 901-902/289(02-03) total measuring 9 bigha 16 biswas and give up the relief pertaining to the remaining Khasra numbers 3. For the sake of convenience 9 bigha 16 biswas of land as described above shall b...
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs.smt. Bimla & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: February 22, 2018 + MAC.APP. 590/2014, CM Nos.10741/2014, 20565/2014 & 41375/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus + MAC.APP. 51/2015, CM Nos.28655/2015 & 20436/2017 SMT. BIMLA & ORS Through: Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS BIMLA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 22nd March, 2014 vide which compensation of `13,05,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, the Insurer seeks reduction of quantum of compensation granted, whereas in the above captioned second appeal, enhancement of compensation is sought by Claimant...
Ritesh Kumar Verma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~28,32,33,34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:21. 2.2018 28 + W.P.(C) 1661/2018 & CM APPL. 6831-6833/2018 32 ARTI VERMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. + W.P.(C) 1666/2018 & CM APPL. 6843-6845/2018 GAURAV GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. W.P. (C) 1661,1666,1667,1668/2018 Page 1 of 4 33 + W.P.(C) 1667/2018 & CM APPL. 6846-6848/2018 RITESH KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. 34 + W.P.(C) 1668/2018 & CM APPL. 6849-6851/2018 DINKAR MUKUL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr...
Punam Tyagi vs.veena Kakar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t February, 2018 + RFA2792017 & CM APPL. 9595/2017 PUNAM TYAGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Khanna and Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advs. (M:9999444007) with husband of Appellant in person. Versus VEENA KAKAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shubhanker Sharda, Advocate for in person. R-1 & 3 with R-3 (M:9958102797) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 is present along with Respondent No.3 in person. Appellant is represented through her husband, who is present in Court. Respondent No.2 has not appeared despite written intimation having been served to him. Respondent No.2 is proceeded ex- parte.2. Arguments heard. The Appellant is the occupant of the second floor of property bearing no.R-12, South Extension, Part-II, New Delhi-110049. Respondent Nos.1 & 3 are the occupants of the ground floor and Respondent No.2 is occupant of the first floor. The proper...
Aaa Landmark Private Ltd. Vs.m/s Akme Projects Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~14 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t February, 2018 Arb. P.418/2017 AAA LANDMARK PRIVATE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Saraswat, Mr.Lokesh Bhola and Ms.Manika Goswamy, Advs. versus M/S AKME PROJECTS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Arjun Syal, Mr.Kartik Nayar, Mr.Rupal Luthra, Mr.Rishabh Kumar & Mr.Shreyan Das, Advs. for R-1 Mr.Arun Monga, Ms.Divya Sharma & Ms.Marcilliva Kalikotey, Advs for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner praying for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement to Sell dated 25.10.2012 (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement). The said Agreement contains an Arbitration Agreement between the parties in form of...
Gurnam Kaur (Deceased) Through Lrs vs.bses Rajdhani Power Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ex. Appl. (OS) 420/2017 in Ex.P. 146/2016 % GURNAM KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH LR's 21st February, 2018 ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht and Mr. Manashwy Jha, Advocates. versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ..... Judgment Debtor Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Devashish Marwah, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Ex. Appl. (OS) 420/2017 in Ex.P. 146/2016 1. By this order the objections filed by judgment debtor under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) are being disposed of. The execution petition is filed by the plaintiffs/decree holders, and who are the legal heirs of the original plaintiff/decree holder Smt. Gurnam Kaur, seeking execution of the Ex. Appl. (OS) 420/2017 in EX.P. 146/2016 Page 1 of 19 judgment dated 14.7.2016 passed in CS (OS) No.2691/2015. The judgment d...
Surjeet Singh Saini vs.guru Teg Bahadur Institue of Technology & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 02.2018 LPA1212017 SURJEET SINGH SAINI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V. Elanchezhiyan, Advocate along with Mr. Jawaid H. Khan and Mr. Nasim Anwar, Advocates. versus GURU TEG BAHADUR INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abinash Kr. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate along with Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocate for DSGMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) In view of the decision rendered by us today in LPA No.95/2017, titled as Baidyanath Yadav & Ors. vs. Guru Tegh Bahadur Polytechnic Institute & Anr, wherein it is held that under Section 32 of the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1971, any and all types of disputes between the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) and its employees are exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of the District Judge in Delhi, the present appeal is devoid of ...
Shyam Lal Jani and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order: February 21, 2018 W.P.(C) 1632/2018& CM Nos.6707-08/2018 SHYAM LAL JANI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Dr.Vijendera Mahndiyan and Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Aman Bakshi, Advocates for Mr.Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for R-1 Mr.Abhishek Pari and Mr.V.Siddharth, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Declaration of result of Security Officer (E1 Level) is under challenge in this petition on the ground that the pass percentage as per the ONGC norms is 65% but in the Advertisement (Annexure P-1), the pass percentage of written examination has been fixed at 60% and this is to the prejudice of petitioners. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the selected candidates have not obtained No Objection Certificate from the respective employers before appearing for the interview but still they have been select...
Manju Gupta vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~30,35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:21. 2.2018 + W.P.(C) 1663/2018 & CM APPL. 6837-6839/2018 MANJU GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. + W.P.(C) 1669/2018 & CM APPL. 6852-6854/2018 SUSHMA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar accepts notice on behalf of official respondents No.1 and 2. W.P. (C) 1663/2018,1669/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. Respondent No.3 is deleted from the array of parties as even according to the petitioner, the said company has been struck of from the Register Of Companies.3. Since, the issue raised in this petition is covered ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »