Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Vir Chand Maini & Anr. Vs.reliance Capital Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 253/2017 VIR CHAND MAINI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Pardeep Dhingra and Mr Mohit Nandwani, Advocates. versus Through: Mr Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Respondent RELIANCE CAPITAL LIMITED CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2802.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning an Arbitral Award dated 04.02.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the Sole Arbitrator Sh. B.S. Shelar, Retired. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai.2. The impugned award was rendered in context of disputes that had arisen in respect of a Mortgage Loan Agreement dated 29.08.2007 (hereafter the Agreement) entered into between the concerned parties. The Agreement was entered into pursuant to a loan application against the property bearing No.D-105, 2nd Floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi...
Shiv Sagar @ Deepak vs.sushila Rani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~87 & 88 * % + MAC.APP. 676/2017 & CM No.27795/2017 87 RAM RAHISH YADAV in person. Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. with appellant ..... Appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2018 versus SUSHILA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Raji Nathani, Adv. for R2 & R4. + MAC.APP. 987/2017 & CM No.40981/2017 88 ..... Appellant SHIV SAGAR @ DEEPAK Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal and Mr. versus Sudhanshu Tiwari, Advs. with appellant in person. SUSHILA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Raji Nathani, Adv. for R2 & R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.10,16,000/- has been awarded to claimants in both the appeals.2. On 20th August, 2014, late Vishan Dass was crossing the road when he was hit by motorcycle bearing No.DL-7S-BJ-7619 which resulted in fatal injuries to late Vishan Dass. The deceased was aged 68 years and was MAC.APP...
Bimal Kumar Jain vs.directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :28. 02.2018 + LPA572018 and CM APPL. 5630-5631/2018 BIMAL KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Malhotra and Mr. Gaurav Kohli, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % 1. Ld. Single Judges order upholding the decision of the Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate in the course of the proceedings under Section 60(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (hereafter referred to as FEMA) is challenged in this appeal.2. The Enforcement Directorate made a complaint on 8.1.2016 alleging violation of provisions of FEMA; a show cause notice was issued on 11.1.2016 to the appellant calling upon him to disclose why adjudication proceedings contemplated under the enactment, should not be drawn. Adjudication purs...
M/S General Security and Information Service vs.assistant Provident Fu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 1968/2018 & CM No.8106/2018 M/S GENERAL SECURITY AND INFORMATION SERVICE Through: Ms.Shrabani Chakrabarty, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER SRO: SILIGURI AND ANR. Through: Mr.Satpal Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Sameer Agrawal, Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. On an advance copy of petition having been served, Mr.Satpal Singh, Advocate appears for respondent no.1 and Mr.Sameer Agrawal, Advocate for respondent no.2.2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 15.06.2015 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Siliguri, West Bengal under Section 14-B and 7-Q of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short EPF Act) assessing the damages at Rs.10,46,915/- and interest to the tune of Rs.8,27,260/- for the period from April, 1996 to F...
Ntpc Limited vs.aqua Designs India Private Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA6102017 & CM APPL. 33896/2017 Date of decision:28. 02.2018 % NTPC LIMITED Through Mr. Bharat Sangal and Ms. Isha ..... Appellant versus Gupta, Advs. AQUA DESIGNS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. P.R. Kovilan, Mr. V. Vasudevan and Ms. Awasthi M.K.,Advs. for R-1. Ms. Arti Banal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) 1. The appellant (hereafter called NTPC) is aggrieved by the order of the ld. Single Judge, who quashed the black-listing of the writ petitioner (hereafter called Aqua) on 11.9.2015.2. The brief facts are that Aqua, which is a water management and engineering company, in 2014 had responded to a bid by the appellant (NTPC). The eligibility conditions inter alia spelt out that the bidder ought to have designed, supplied, erected and commissioned/ supervised at least two water plants/waste water treatment...
Apar Industries Ltd vs.kalyani Petrochem Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h February, 2018 CRL.L.P. 582/2017 APAR INDUSTRIES LTD ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A.K. Srivastava, Adv. versus ALLIANCZ POLY-CHEM OVERSEAS LTD CRL.L.P. 587/2017 Represented by: ..... Respondent APAR INDUSTRIES LTD ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A.K. Srivastava, Adv. versus KALYANI PETROCHEM PVT LTD & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By these petitions the petitioners seek leave to appeal against the impugned judgment dated 30th May, 2017 whereby the respondents were acquitted for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2.... Petitioners filed two criminal complaints being No.22460/2016 and 22605/2016 titled as Apar Industries Limited Vs. Alliancz Poly-chem Overseas Limited and Apar Industries Limited Vs. Kalyani Petrochem CRL.L.P. 582/2017 and CRL.L.P. 587/2017 Page 1 of 4 Private Limited for dishonor of ...
Vinod Singh Yadav vs.m/s.securitans India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :30. 01.2018 Date of Judgment:28. 02.2016 W.P. (C) 185/2016 VINOD SINGH YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Syed Sajad, Advocate. Versus M/S SECURITANS INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Mehta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition under Articleof the Constitution of India by the petitioner is the Award dated 02.11.2015 in case vide LIR No.393/2012 on making a reference dated 22.06.2012 by Deputy Labour Commissioner, Govt. of NCT of Delhi under Section 10 (1) (c) and 12 (5) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in brief I.D.Act) with the terms of the reference Whether services of Sh.Vinod Singh Yadav have been illegally and/or unjustifiably terminated by the management, and if yes, to what relief is he entitled?. and the Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (In short Industrial Adjudicator) returned the findings that it has no W.P (C) 185/2016...
Sajal Kumar Tripathi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:28.2.2018 W.P.(C) 1910/2018, CM APPL.7947-7949/2018 SAJAL KUMAR TRIPATHI Through: Mr. Alok Tripathi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate for R-1 & 2. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.7948-7949/2018 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1910/2018, CM APPL.7947/2018 (stay) 1. Issue notice. Ms. Ruchi Jain, who appears for respondent no.1 & 2 accepts notice. 1.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit would serve no W.P.(C)1910/2018 Page 1 o...
National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Progressive-Mvr Joint Ventu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 391/2017 & IA No.12843/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Anukul Raj, Ms Nikita Raj Amar, Varun and Mr Advocates. versus M/S PROGRESSIVE-MVR JOINT VENTURE ..... Respondent Through: Mr Swaroop George, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2802.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter NHAI) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning an Arbitral Award dated 29.06.2017 (hereafter the impugned award). The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen in respect of an agreement dated 20.10.2005 (hereafter the Agreement) entered into between the concerned parties for the works pertaining to Four Lanning from Km 402.00 to Km 440.00 of Gopalganj-Muzaffarpur Section of NH-28 in Bihar, Contract Package No.LMNHP-EW-II- (WB)-10. O.M.P. (COMM) 391/2017 Page ...
Parasramika Holdings Pvt Ltd. Vs.ambience Private Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2018
$~42,44 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h February, 2018 + + + ARB.P. 163/2018 & I.A. No.2933/2018 ARB.P. 166/2018 & I.A. No.2940/2018 ARB.P. 167/2018 & I.A. No.2951/2018 PARASRAMIKA HOLDINGS PVT LTD. MILI MARKETING PVT.LTD MORAN PLANTATION PVT.LTD ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Prashanti Pasupuleti, Mr.B.M.Shashank, Advs versus AMBIENCE PRIVATE LTD Through: Ms.Tannya Sharma, Adv ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.2933/2018 (Exemption) in Arb.P.163/2018 IA No.2940/2018 (Exemption) in Arb.P.166/2018 IA No.2951/2018 (Exemption) in Arb.P.167/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB.P.163/2018 ARB.P.166/2018 ARB.P.167/2018 1. These petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Arb. P.163/2018, 166/2018 & 167/2018 Page No.1 Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been filed by the petitioner(s) prayin...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »