Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Through Special Investigation Team s.i.t.(1984 Riots) vs.sajjan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.338/2017 & Crl.M.C.339/2017 Judgment reserved on :12. h December, 2017 Date of decision :22. d February, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 338/2017 STATE THROUGH SPECIAL INVESTIGATION TEAM S.I.T.(1984 RIOTS) ........ Petitioner SAJJAN KUMAR ..... Respondent versus AND CRL.M.C. 339/2017 STATE THROUGH SPECIAL INVESTIGATION TEAM S.I.T.(1984 RIOTS) ........ Petitioner versus SAJJAN KUMAR ..... Respondent + CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petitions both under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner, i.e., the State through the Special Investigation Team (1984 Riots) has assailed the impugned orders in Bail Appln. No.14072/2015 and in Crl.M.C3382017 & 339/2017 Page 1 of 132 Bail Appln. No.14073/2015 both dated 21.12.2016 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01/Special Judge (P.C. Act) (CBI-03), Dwarka Courts in FIR No.227/1992, under Sections 147/148...
Pr. Cit-3 vs.dlf Commercial Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~11-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:22. 02.2018 ITA5072014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant DLF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS LTD. versus ..... Respondent With connected matters: + + ITA5632015 ITA6102017, C.M. APPL.28227/2017 Through : Sh. Amol Sinha and Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Advocates, for respondent, in Item Nos.11 to 13. Sh. Ashok. K. Manchanda and Sh. Raghavendra Singh, Advocates, for Revenue, in Item Nos.11 and 12. Sh. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue, in Item No.13. Sh. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. P. Roychaudhuri and Sh. Anil Kumar, Advocates, for respondent, in Item Nos.11 to13. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1.2. The appeals are allowed. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 22.02.2018 in ITA5072014 may be referred to. FEBRUARY22 2018 S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) A.K. CHAWLA (JUDGE) ITA5072014, 563/2015 & 610/2017 Page 1 of 1...
Asha Aggarwal vs.lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1412/2015 ASHA AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar and Mr. Setu Niket, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Kushal Raj Tater and Mohd. Shoiab Akhtar, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of notification No.10(29)/96/L&B/LA19599dated 20.03.2013 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The subject matter of this writ petition is land comprised in Khasra No.25//2(0-13), 36//5 (1-07) situated in village Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi.3. Some necessary...
Master Raju Saigal Trust vs.gift Tax Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + GTA42007 Date of decision:22. 02.2018 MASTER RAJU SAIGAL TRUST ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Y.K. Kapur, Adv. versus GIFT TAX OFFICER Through : Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. for ..... Respondent Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % 1. The following questions of law arise for consideration : (i) Whether the period of 12 months or 6 months, as the case may be, as prescribed in proviso to Section 15(2) of the Gift Tax Act, 1958, is applicable to re-assessment proceedings initiated under Section 16 of the said Act?. (ii) If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative, whether the assessment order dated 29.03.2001 would be bad in law as being beyond the time prescribed?.2. The brief facts are that the assessee filed gift tax return on 16.4.1987. This return was filed pursuant to a notice under Section 16(1)(a) of the Gift Tax Act. ...
Rajesh Agrawal ..... Petitioner vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~4 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10780/2016 RAJESH AGRAWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anoop Singh Saroha, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA with Mr.Mayank Mukharjee, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Previous order has not been complied with. Counter affidavit has not been filed. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court today. Same is taken on record.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.175 admeasuring 01 bigha out of 11 bigha 4 biswa situated in the revenue estate of Village Shahbad Dau...
Krishan Kumar Wadhwa & Ors vs.arjun Som Dutt & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~11 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3316/2015 & IA Nos. 23298/2015, 15617/2017 & 420/2018 KRISHAN KUMAR WADHWA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Samar Bansal, versus Ms. Sheya Singh and Mr. Sajal Jain, Advocates ARJUN SOM DUTT & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate for D-1 Mr. Munindra Dvivedi & Ms. Tanya Chanda, Advocates for D-2&4. Mr. Dhruv Mohan, Advocate for D-3, Along with D-3, in person. Date of Decision:22. d February, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): IA No.6255/2017 (Under Order 12, Rule 6, CPC) 1. Present application has been filed by the plaintiffs under Order 12 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of Rs. 7,50,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Crore and Fifty Lakhs only) out of the advance sale consideration of Rs. 10,00,00,000/- (Rupees ten crores only) paid to defendant nos. 1 to 4 along with interest @ 15% per annum. CS(OS) 3316/2015 Page 1 of 7 2. Learned counsel for the...
Sunita Rani vs.lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~22 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7521/2015 SUNITA RANI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar and Mr. Setu Niket, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Komal Sorout and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of notification No.10(29)/96/L&B/LA11394dated 27.10.1999 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The subject matter of this writ petition is land comprised in Khasra No.3(1-07) situated in village Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi.3. Some necessary facts which are required...
M/S Pulling & Lifting Machines (P) Ltd vs.ruskin Titus India Pvt. Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~CP-19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % Date of decision:22. 02.2018 + CO.PET. 342/2014 and CA No.205/2015 M/S PULLING & LIFTING MACHINES (P) LTD......... Petitioner Through Mr.V.N.Sharma and Mr.V.K.Malhotra, Advs. versus RUSKIN TITUS INDIA PVT. LIMITED. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tanuj Khurana and Mr.Jaskaran S. Narula, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed by the petitioner under Sections 433(e), 434 and 1. 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent company.2. The case of the petitioner is that on 12.10.2013, after visiting the site and holding discussions with the respondent Company, the petitioner quoted its rates for shifting of factory assets and machinery as per letter dated 12.10.2013. On confirmation of the rates, the petitioner company is said to have shifted 950 tons of the machinery @ 1900/- per ton and another 950 tons on supervision charges @ 250/- per ton amounting to Rs.22,94,953/-...
Amish Aggarwala vs.bar Council of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"22.02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1038/2018 AMISH AGGARWALA ........ Petitioner Through Dr.Adish C.Aggarwala, Sr.Adv with Mr.Amish Aggarwala, Mr.Virinder Vashist, Advs. versus BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.T.Singh Dev with Col..R.Balasubramaniam, Mr.Amandeep Kaur, Advs. + W.P.(C) 1111/2018 & C.M.Nos.4656/2018&5616/2018. SANJEEV YADAV ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajiv Khosla, Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Kumar with Mr.Sanjiv Yadav, Advs. versus BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Priyam Mehta, Adv for BCI with Mr.Nalin Raj, Asst. Sec. Mr.T.Singh Dev with Mr.R.Balasubramaniam, Mr.Amandeep Kaur, Advs for R-1. Mr.Sushil Kumar Pandey for applicant in C.M.No.5616/2018. W.P.(C)Nos.1038/2018, 1111/2018 &1357/2018 Page 1 of 5 + W.P.(C) 1357/2018 & C.M.Nos.5612/2018& 5613/2018 RAJESH CHUGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pavan Narang with Mr.Gaurav Puri, Advs. versus SECRETARY, BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI ..... Respond...
pr.cit-iv vs.dlf Commercial Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~11-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:22. 02.2018 ITA5072014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant DLF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS LTD. versus ..... Respondent With connected matters: + + ITA5632015 ITA6102017, C.M. APPL.28227/2017 Through : Sh. Amol Sinha and Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Advocates, for respondent, in Item Nos.11 to 13. Sh. Ashok. K. Manchanda and Sh. Raghavendra Singh, Advocates, for Revenue, in Item Nos.11 and 12. Sh. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue, in Item No.13. Sh. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. P. Roychaudhuri and Sh. Anil Kumar, Advocates, for respondent, in Item Nos.11 to13. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1.2. The appeals are allowed. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 22.02.2018 in ITA5072014 may be referred to. FEBRUARY22 2018 S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) A.K. CHAWLA (JUDGE) ITA5072014, 563/2015 & 610/2017 Page 1 of 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »