Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anand Prakash Gupta vs.gold Cause Constructions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d February, 2018 CS(OS) 231/2012 & IAs No.4959/2017 (of defendants u/O IX R-13 CPC) & 248/2018 (for condonation of 45 days delay in filing rejoinder to IA No.4959/2017) ANAND PRAKASH GUPTA Through: Mr. Debopriyo Pal, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus GOLD CAUSE CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR ... Defendants Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Esha Dutta & Mr. Sahil Garg, Advs. Mr. Vivek Kohli & Ms. Yeshi Rinchhen, Advs. for Zeus Law Associate. AND + CS(OS) 232/2012 & IAs No.4960/2017 (of defendants u/O IX R-13 CPC) & 247/2018 (for condonation of 45 days delay in filing rejoinder to IA No.4960/2017) ANAND PRAKASH GUPTA Through: Mr. Debopriyo Pal, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus GOLD CAUSE CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR ... Defendants Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Esha Dutta & Mr. Sahil Garg, Advs. Mr. Vivek Kohli & Ms. Yeshi Rinchhen, Advs. for Zeus Law Associate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CS(OS) Nos.231/2012 & 232/2012...
C. J. International Hotels Ltd. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1703/2018 & C.M. No.7036/2018 C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.H.S. Chandhoke, Ms.Shweta Kakkad, Mr.Shiv Sapra, Ms.Natasha Sood, Ms.Shreya Sethi, Ms.Neha Mehta, Ms.Shruti Sharma & Ms.Deepti Arya, Advs. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms.Reha Verma, Mr.Yoginder Handoo, Mr.Nishant Kumar, Ms.Puja Kalra & Mr.Virendra Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Pursuant to notice issued in the present petition on 21.02.2018, the respondent has entered appearance and submits that in view of the nature of controversy involved in the matter, he does not want to file any counter affidavit and prays that the WP (C) No.1703/2018 Page 1 of 4 cmatter may be heard on the basis of documents already on record.2. After some arguments, Mr.Sanjay Jain, learned ASG appearing...
Swami Agnivesh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1557/2018 & CM No.6396/2018 % Date of decision :22. d February, 2018 SWAMI AGNIVESH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. RHA Sikander and Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocates alongwith Swami Agnivesh (petitioner in person) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Dr. GL Bhatia, Advocates for Union of India (respondent No.1) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE WP(C) No.1557/2018 1. This writ petition seeks directions to the Central Board of Film Certification, to take appropriate steps to stop glorification of the practice of Sati by deleting the relevant scenes from the film Padmaavat.2. The petition is premised on two articles, one by Ms. Charu W.P.(C)No.1557/2018 Page 1 of 17 Gupta in the Indian Express dated 31st of January 2018 captioned United in misogyny and another article written by an a...
Shri Shyam Sunder vs.sohan Singh @ Shoban Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d February 2018 + RFA1892015 SHRI SHYAM SUNDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. versus SOHAN SINGH @ SHOBAN SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J (Oral) CM APPL.5323/2015 1. The counsel for the Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) prays for condonation of delay on the ground that the Plaintiff was suffering from jaundice during the relevant period and hence could not take steps to file the appeal. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 213 days is condoned. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. RFA1892015 2. The Respondent/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) was directed to be served through publication vide order dated 22nd January, 2018. None appears for the Defendant and they are proceeded ex-parte.3. 4. Copy of the publication is taken on record. This is an appeal against the impugned order dated 16th May, ...
Mahesh Chand Mohnani & Anr. Vs.manohar Bhasin Hazooria
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~22 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d February, 2018 CONT.APP.(C) 2/2016 and CM Nos. 4144/2016 & 5186/2017 MAHESH CHAND MOHNANI & ANR. Through Mr. R. L. Kohli, Adv. ..... Appellants versus MANOHAR BHASIN HAZOORIA ..... Respondent Through Ms. Shalini Kapoor with Ms. Ruhini Dey and Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Appellant No.1 Mahesh Chand Mohnani has not appeared and medical certificate is produced stating that he is unwell.2. On 29.01.2018 by a detailed order, we had decided the contentions and issues raised by the appellants in this contempt appeal against conviction. We had however adjourned the matter to enable the counsel for the appellants to obtain instructions on the question of payment. For convenience, order dated 29.01.2018 is reproduced below:-"Mahesh Chand Mohnani and Vasari India Pvt. Ltd. have filed the present appeal under Section 19 of the...
Surjan (Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"22nd February, 2018 + CM(M) 1042/2016 SURJAN (DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Smriti Vashisht, Advocate with Mr. Piyush Rayal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate with Mrs. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing counsel for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The order under challenge was passed by the Additional District Judge, South-West (ADJ) on 23.05.2016 on the file registered as M.No.151on the application of the petitioner under Sections 151/152/153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for correction of the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2005 passed by the ADJ in proceedings arising out of reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It appears that the matter in so far as the petitioner is concerned related to grant of...
Azhar Ahmed vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
$~31 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8540/2016 AZHAR AHMED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sonal Anand and Mr. Aayush Sai, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Previous order has not been complied with, however the counter affidavit has been handed over in Court today. Same is taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and final disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra Nos. 57 (1-08) measuring 01 Bigh 08 Biswa situated in the revenue State of Village Beholpur, Khader Tehsil, M...
Bimla & Ors vs.national Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: February 22, 2018 + MAC.APP. 590/2014, CM Nos.10741/2014, 20565/2014 & 41375/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus + MAC.APP. 51/2015, CM Nos.28655/2015 & 20436/2017 SMT. BIMLA & ORS Through: Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS BIMLA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 22nd March, 2014 vide which compensation of `13,05,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, the Insurer seeks reduction of quantum of compensation granted, whereas in the above captioned second appeal, enhancement of compensation is sought by Claimant...
Shadab Khairi & Anr vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 02.2018 $~10 * % + SHADAB KHAIRI & ANR LPA7832017, CAV10582017, CM APPL. 44840/2017 (stay), CM APPL. 44841/2017, CM APPL. 44842/2017, CM APPL. 1929/2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr Viresh B. Saharya, Mr Akshat Agarwal, Advs versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms Raveena Tandon, Advs for... RESPONDENTS 1 and 4 Mr Jayant Bhatt, Ms Mekhala Pandey, Advs for Respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. It is axiomatic that all legislations in a welfare State are enacted with the object of promoting the general welfare. But certain enactments are more responsive to some urgent social demands and have more immediate and visible impact on the social vices in society by operating more directly to achieve social reforms. These enactments, in our view, demand an interpretation liberal enough to ach...
Suresh Kumar Lahiri vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d February, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 1430/2017 SURESH KUMAR LAHIRI ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi, versus Advocate. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms. Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms. Nandita Rao, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Shikshit Kumar, PS Jyoti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.7886/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.A. No.7888/2017 (Delay in refiling) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 54 days in refiling the petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 1430/2017 1. By the present petition, the petitioner inter alia prays for restoration of possession of property bearing No.C-58, Gali No.3, North Chhajjupur, Shahdara, Delhi and setting aside of the order dated 8th March, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, North East De...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »