Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 23 2018

Mukesh vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

$~30, 32 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Date of Order: February 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 1716/2018 & CM Nos.7134-36/2018 MUKESH Through: Mr.Ankit Kohli, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 1732/2018 & CM Nos.7181-83/2018 PRADEEP KUMAR Through: Mr.Ankit Kohli, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 1738/2018 & CM Nos.7195-97/2018 Through: Mr.Ankit Kohli, Advocate ........ Petitioner RAJESH KUMAR OJHA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 ORDER (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.1716/2018 & conn.matters Page 1 of 3 1. The subject matter of the above captioned three petitions is identical, therefore, with consent of learned counsel for parties, these petitions are being disposed of by this common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

Anirudh Singha vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:23. February 2018 + W.P.(C) 1682/2018 ANIRUDH SINGHA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Akhilesh Kumar and Ms. Vipra Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-1 & 2 CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.6919/2018 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1682/2018 & CM No.6918/2018 2. Issue notice. Mr. Gogna, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2.3. Mr. Gogna says that in view of the fact that the petitioner relies upon the order dated 19.1.2018, passed in W.P.(C) No.505/2018 titled: Ramanathan Annamalai vs. Union of India, the same order can be passed in the present petition as well. W.P.(C) 1682/2018 Page 1 of 4 4. Briefly, the petitioner claims that he was, at the given point of time, appointed as a Director in the company by the name: Batla Transport City Service ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

Flint Group India Private Limited vs.jagran Prakashan Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

$~10 & 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on :-"23rd February, 2018 CM(M) 207/2018 & CM66682018 M/S FLINT GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Mishra, Advocate. Versus M/S JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED Through: None. ..... Respondent AND + CM(M) 208/2018 & CMs 6669-6670/2018 FLINT GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Mishra, Advocate. ..... Respondent versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED Through: None. ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both these petitions arise out of orders dated 25.05.2017 and 03.11.2017 passed by the additional district judge on the file of summary suit (CIS No.209714/2016) instituted by the petitioner against the respondent (defendant) on 08.02.2016 for recovery of Rs.23,88,679/- invoking the procedure set out in Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). CM(M) Nos.207/2018 & 208/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. It appears that by the order dated 25.05.2017, the additional distri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

Aruna Sharma @ Aruna Rakesh vs.krishna Devi & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:23. d February, 2018 RSA312018 & C.M.Nos.6661-62/2018 ARUNA SHARMA @ ARUNA RAKESH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dinesh Rohilla, Advocate. Versus KRISHNA DEVI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This second appeal impugns an order dated 21.04.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-03 (West), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, which dismissed the appellants appeal against an order of the Trial Court dated 14.09.2016, which had held that the suit of the plaintiff-appellant was barred under provisions of section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as the plaintiff and the defendant in the same sequence in which they were arrayed in the original suit.3. The brief facts of the case are that a Civil Suit bearing no.2was filed by the plaintiff-appellant in the year 2002 seeking ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

Ravi @ Munna vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 231/2017 DEEPAK YADAV Judgment Reserved On:18. 08.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 02.2018 versus ... Appellant No.1 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent CRL.A. 317/2017 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 545/2017 RAVI @ MUNNA STATE versus ... Appellant No.2 ... Respondent CRL.A. 493/2017 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 871/2017 BABU MUSAHID @ ALI @ AKRAM versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ... Appellant No.3 ... Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate for Appellant No.1 Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate for Appellant No.2 Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate with Mr. Pritish Chaudhary, Advocate for Appellant No.3 Mr. Ravi Naik, APP with Inspector Prashanant Yadav, PS Jagat Puri CRL.A. Nos.231/2017, 317/2017 and 493/2017 Page 1 of 49 CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present batch of criminal appeals instituted under the provision of section ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

Dharambir Singh vs.director of Education & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Order: February 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1752/2018 DHARAMBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Avadh Kaushik and Mr.Prashant Sharma, Advocates for Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD, Mr.Devesh Dubey and Mr.Zahid Hanief, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL ) 1. Impugned order of 12th December, 2017 (Annexure P-1) rejects petitioners Representation seeking re-employment. The reason put-forth in the impugned order (Annexure P-1) is that due to pendency of inquiry proceedings against petitioner, re-employment has not been granted to him.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that proceedings in the criminal case against petitioner have not yet commenced and no departmental inquiry is to be initiated on the complaint of sexual harassment and only an in-house inquiry is pending which is in progress.... Petitio...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

S. Vs.m.k.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 2/2018, CM Nos. 64/2018 (stay), 65/2018 (Exemption) Decided on:23. 02.2018 and CM No.66/2018 (Condonation of delay in filing the appeal) S. M.K. ..... Appellant Through: Mr Imran Ali and Mr Johar Adeeb, versus Through: Advs. None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA (Oral) 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, impugning the judgment dated 31.10.2017, whereby the marriage between the parties was dissolved on the ground of cruelty being committed by the appellant/wife.2. The admitted facts of the case are that the marriage between the appellant/wife and the respondent/husband was solemnized on 11.07.2008 at Delhi according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. After consummation of the marriage, a male child, namely, Samesth was born out of the wedlock on 10.03.2010.3. The petition for divorce on t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018

Varun Makkar and Anr. Vs.registrar of Companies, Nct of Delhi and Hary ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2018

$~59 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:23.2.2018 W.P. (C) 1740/2018, CM APPL.7221/2018 VARUN MAKKAR AND ANR. Through: Mr. Amit Dayal, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, NCT OF DELHI AND HARYANA AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Roshan Lal Goel with Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. R.M. Tripathi, Advocates. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, who appears for respondents, accepts notice. 1.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit would serve no purpose as the stand of the respondents is the same as in Sandeep Singh & Anr (sup...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2018