Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ifci Ltd vs.ceylon Biscuit and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:16. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:23.02.2018 + REVIEW PETITION No.348/2016 in CO. APP. 7/2013 IFCI LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advs. CEYLON BISCUIT AND OTHERS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sarvesh Kr. Mishra, Adv for R-1. Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Mr. Rudrajit Ghose and Mr. Vikramaditya, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Megha Bhawana, Adv for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv for O.L. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.REVIEW PETITION No.348/2016 1 The Review... Petitioner is seeking a review of the order dated 29.01.2013. Vide this order on an application of the IFCI, the following directions were issued:-"i. Respondent No.1 will hand over possession to the representatives of the appellant, Mr. O.C. Rana, Associate Vice President, who represents the interest of the secured creditors. Review Pet No.348/2016 in Co.App.7/2013...
Milestone Trade Links vs.yamuna Industries Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 611/2016 #5 MILESTONE TRADE LINKS ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Pankaj Bhagat, Advocate versus YAMUNA INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. S.K. Gandhi with Mrs. Manjula Gandhi and Mr Shivanshu Kumar, Advocates % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:23. d February, 2018. JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 2883/2017 1. Present application has been filed under Order 11 Rule 4 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts, 2015 (for short Act, 2015) read with Section 151 CPC seeking permission to file additional documents and for leading secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short Act, 1872). Page 1 of 4 CS (COMM) 611/2016 2. Learned Joint Registrar vide order dated 7th March, 2017 has held that no permission to lead secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Act, 1872 is required.3. Learned counsel for the defendants submits...
Sandesh Chhatwal vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~43 & 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:23. February 2018 + W.P.(C) 1694/2018 VIJAY CHARLU ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Bharat Arora and Mr. Vikhyat versus Oberoi, Advs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anunita Chandra, Adv. for Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 1741/2018 SANDESH CHHATWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Bharat Arora and Mr. Vikhyat versus Oberoi, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anunita Chandra, Adv. for Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER W.P.(C) 1694/2018 & Conn. Page 1 of 4 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.6975/2018 in W.P.(C) 1694/2018 CM No.7223/2018 in W.P.(C) 1741/2018 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1694/2018 & CM No.6974/2018 W.P.(C) 1741/2018 & CM No.7222/2018 2. Issue notice. Ms. Anunita Chandra accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1/UOI.3. The issue which arises in the present petitions has arisen...
Sh. Yogesh Kumar vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8075/2017 SH. YOGESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Samit Khosla, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sachin Nawani, Advocate for respondent no.1/UOI. Mr.Dhanesh and Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates for respondent/DDA. Relan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.33220/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8075/2017 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land comprised in Khasra No.515/150 situated in W.P. (C) No.8075/2017 Page 1 of 4 the revenue estate of village Dallupura, Del...
Deepak Yadav vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 231/2017 DEEPAK YADAV Judgment Reserved On:18. 08.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 02.2018 versus ... Appellant No.1 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent CRL.A. 317/2017 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 545/2017 RAVI @ MUNNA STATE versus ... Appellant No.2 ... Respondent CRL.A. 493/2017 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 871/2017 BABU MUSAHID @ ALI @ AKRAM versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ... Appellant No.3 ... Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate for Appellant No.1 Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate for Appellant No.2 Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate with Mr. Pritish Chaudhary, Advocate for Appellant No.3 Mr. Ravi Naik, APP with Inspector Prashanant Yadav, PS Jagat Puri CRL.A. Nos.231/2017, 317/2017 and 493/2017 Page 1 of 49 CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present batch of criminal appeals instituted under the provision of section ...
Rajesh Kumar Ojha vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~30, 32 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Date of Order: February 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 1716/2018 & CM Nos.7134-36/2018 MUKESH Through: Mr.Ankit Kohli, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 1732/2018 & CM Nos.7181-83/2018 PRADEEP KUMAR Through: Mr.Ankit Kohli, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 1738/2018 & CM Nos.7195-97/2018 Through: Mr.Ankit Kohli, Advocate ........ Petitioner RAJESH KUMAR OJHA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 ORDER (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.1716/2018 & conn.matters Page 1 of 3 1. The subject matter of the above captioned three petitions is identical, therefore, with consent of learned counsel for parties, these petitions are being disposed of by this common...
Rakesh Jain vs.yogesh Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~28 & 29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + OMP (CONT.) 2/2017 RAKESH JAIN Through: Decree Holder in person ..... Decree Holder PREETI JAIN alongwith his son. versus ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr Avadh Kaushik, Advocate. AND + OMP (CONT.) 3/2017 RAKESH JAIN Through: Decree Holder in person ..... Decree Holder alongwith his son. versus ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr Avadh Kaushik, Advocate. YOGESH JAIN CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2302.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petitions under Section 27(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) read with Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.2. The petitioner prays that the proceedings for the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 be initiated against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 14.10.2004 and interim award dated 01.04.2010 passed by the Sole Arbitrator.3. Mr Yogesh Jain, (the respondent in OMP (CONT.) 3/2017) is OMP (C...
Pawanjit Singh Bawa vs.delhi Development Authority & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"23rd February, 2018 CM(M) 195/2014 & CM No.3443/2014 PAWANJIT SINGH BAWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajoy B. Kalia, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR Through: Mr. Ajay Verma with Ms. ........ RESPONDENTS Diviani Khanna, Advocates for R-1. Mr. D. Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition whereby the order dated 25.01.2014 of the first appellate court in appeal (MCA No.13/2013) was challenged, the application of the first respondent Delhi Development Authority (DDA), a defendant in the suit, under Order IX Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) dated 15.07.2011 having been allowed and the order dated 23.08.2011 of the senior civil judge dismissing the said application was set aside, thereby vacating and setting aside the ex p...
Babu Musahid @ Ali @ Akram vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 231/2017 DEEPAK YADAV Judgment Reserved On:18. 08.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 02.2018 versus ... Appellant No.1 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent CRL.A. 317/2017 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 545/2017 RAVI @ MUNNA STATE versus ... Appellant No.2 ... Respondent CRL.A. 493/2017 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 871/2017 BABU MUSAHID @ ALI @ AKRAM versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ... Appellant No.3 ... Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate for Appellant No.1 Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate for Appellant No.2 Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate with Mr. Pritish Chaudhary, Advocate for Appellant No.3 Mr. Ravi Naik, APP with Inspector Prashanant Yadav, PS Jagat Puri CRL.A. Nos.231/2017, 317/2017 and 493/2017 Page 1 of 49 CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present batch of criminal appeals instituted under the provision of section ...
Surender @ Arjun vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d February, 2018 CRL.A. 245/2016 SURENDER @ ARJUN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with SI Gaurav Kumar PS Civil Line ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this appeal the appellant had challenged his conviction for offences punishable under Section 363/367/377 IPC and the order on sentence dated 27th March, 2015 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years for offences punishable under Sections 367 and 377 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years for offence punishable under Section 363 IPC.2. The case of the prosecution is that the appellant kidnapped a minor child aged two and a half years old and committed sodomy on him. The act of the appellant was witnessed by Hardarshan and Vikram who were present having seen the child being taken and thereafter informed the parents. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »