Skip to content

Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 26 2018

dr.ravindra Kumar vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, Departm ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1059/2018 & CM No.4419/2018 DR. RAVINDRA KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rudreshwar Singh, Mr.Saurabh Jain, Mr.Sumeet Kr. Singh & Mr.Abhimanyu Kapoor, Advs. versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Satya Prakash Singh, Advs. for UOI. Mr.Kundan K. Mishra & Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, who was elected as a Member of the Central Council of Homeopathy pursuant to the results of the elections of the Council declared on 17.08.2017, has filed the present petition W.P.(C) 1059-2018 Page 1 of 5 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 15.01.2018 vide which the respondent No.1 has based on an inquiry, declare...


Feb 26 2018

Sunil Sharma & Anr vs.registrar of Companies & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~55 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 02.2018 + W.P. (C) 1822/2018, CM APPL.7527-7528/2018 SUNIL SHARMA & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Through: Mr. Ketan Madan with Mr. Himanshu Harbola, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Advocates CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.7528/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exemptions. W.P. (C) 1822/2018, CM APPL.7527/2018 (stay) 2. Issue notice. Mr. Rajesh Kumar accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.3. Counsel for the petitioners relies upon the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017 passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017 titled: Sandeep Singh and Anr. v. Registrar of W.P.(C) 1822/2018 Page 1 of 4 Companies and Ors. Learned counsel says that the issue which arises for consideration in the present petition is similar to the issue which arises in Sande...


Feb 26 2018

Arunima Gupta and Anr. Vs.department of Health and Family Welfare and ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2018 % + W.P.(C) 10032/2017 ARUNIMA GUPTA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, versus Adv. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. for GNCTD. Ms. Bharathi Raju, CGSC with Mr. Rohit Saroj, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. This writ petition makes a grievance regarding the lack of a standard operating procedure so far as Mohalla Clinics proposed by the Department of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of NCT of Delhi - respondent no.1 are concerned.2. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ld. Addl. Standing Counsel for the Govt. of NCT of Delhi has placed before us a tabulation of categorization of the health facilities in Delhi, which is to the following effect: W.P.(C) No.10032 of 2017 Pg. 1 o...


Feb 26 2018

Puneet Kumar vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1378/2018 & CM No.5733/2018 PUNEET KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shobhan Mahanti, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai and Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advs. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Notice in this writ petition was issued on 13.2.2018 when Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC had entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no.1 & 2. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi was permitted on that date to file a counter affidavit. Despite the opportunity, no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1 & 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue which arises for consideration in the present case is similar to the issue which arose for consideration in W.P.(C)No.11275/2017, titled: Harpreet Singh Batra & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.2. A copy of the said order has been furnished i...


Feb 26 2018

Offshore Infrastructure Limited vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11043/2017 & CM APPL. 45136-45137/2017 Reserved on:05. 02.2018 Pronounced on:26. 02.2018 OFFSHORE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. T K Ganju, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Dudeja & Mr. Sudhanshu Goel, Advocates versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V N Kaura with Ms. Paramjeet Benipal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.% 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of its bid submitted in response to the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for combined station works, including, civil, mechanical, electrical, telecom and instrumentation works at Paradip, Vizag, Rajamundry and Vijayawada stations and two 10000 KL capacity cone roof fire water storage tank at Vizag station under the PHPL Project (hereafter called the work). The petitioners bid was rejected on the ground of technical unfeasibility.2. The facts are that t...


Feb 26 2018

Balbir Singh vs.b.s.e.s Yamuna Power Ltd. And Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~27 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 26, 2018 W.P.(C) 1784/2018 & CM73877388/2018 BALBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra S. Garia and Mr.Shashank Singh, Advocates Versus B.S.E.S YAMUNA POWER LTD. AND ANR......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate for R-1 Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of the transfer order of 8th December, 2017 (Annexure P-1) and the communication of 31st January, 2018 (Annexure P-2) is sought by petitioner who is shift in-charge with respondent BSES and he claims to be a trade union leader and General Secretary of DESU Mazdoor Sangh for last several years.2. In the first round of litigation, respondent BSES was directed to decide petitioners Representation of 12th December, 2017 (Annexure P-31) which now stands decided vide impugned communication 31st January, 2018 (Annexure P-2) which discloses that petitioners new place W.P....


Feb 26 2018

Inder Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2018 DECIDED ON :26. h FEBRUARY, 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 20/2015 & Crl.M.A. 59/2015 (Stay) INDER KUMAR STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State. + W.P.(CRL) 21/2015 & Crl.M.A. 64/2015 (Stay) INDER KUMAR STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioner under Articleof the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. to challenge the legality and correctness of orders dated 21.08.2014 and 14.10.2014 respectively whereby costs `3,500/- were imposed upon him while allowing the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall PW-5 (Radhey Shyam). Prayer was also made to expunge the deprecatory rema...


Feb 26 2018

Fahim vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 997/2015 Reserved on:6. h February, 2018 Decided on:26. h February, 2018 SUNIL @ RAGHU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar and Mr. Harsh Singhal, Advocates. STATE + FAHIM STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent AND CRL.A. 1053/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Avinash, Advocate. versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment dated 16th October 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Crl.A. 997/ 2015 & 1053/2015 Page 1 of 33 North West, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.24/2013 arising out of FIR No.313/2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Mahendra Park, convicting the Appellants Sunil @ Raghu (A-1) and Fahim @ Sonu (A-2) for the offences under Sections 3IPC, ...


Feb 26 2018

Narender Kumar vs.staff Selection Commission and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : February 26, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1780/2018 & CM No.7476-7477/2018 % 1 NARENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta and Mr. Rahul Sinha, Advocates Versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for UOI Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel with Ms. Aparna Sinha, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of show cause notice of 10th June, 2013 (Annexure P-1) ORDER (ORAL) and order dated 27th January, 2014 (Annexure P-2) vide which petitioner has been debarred for a period of three years from appearing in the Staff Selection Commission examinations, is sought in this petition.... Petitioner had appeared in combined recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadres and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in Food Corporation of India Examination, 2012 and as per show cause notice (Annexure P-1) petitione...


Feb 26 2018

Ashok Kumar Aggrawal & Anr vs.union of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2018

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. February 2018 + ASHOK KUMAR AGGRAWAL & ANR W.P. (C) 1777/2018, CM APPL.7375-7376/2018 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saurabh Kalia with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Shubham Pundir and Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % CM APPL.7376/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 1777/2018, CM APPL.7375/2018 (seeking stay) 2. Issue notice. Mr. Manish Mohan accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Since counsel for the petitioners seek to place reliance on judgment of another Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 10659/2017, dated 20.12.2017, titled: Navneet Kumar Kohli and Others v. Union of India and Anr, no purpose would be served in filing the counter affidavit. This is so especially in view of the fact W.P. (C) 1777/2018 Page 1 of 3 that the st...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial