Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Ashwani Kumar Kala vs.school Management of Hira Lal Jain Senior Se ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~28 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 26, 2018 W.P.(C) 1785/2018 & CM No.7389/2018 DR. ASHWANI KUMAR KALA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Joginder Sukhija, Advocate Versus with petitioner in person SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF HIRA LAL JAIN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ORS. Through: Counsel (appearance not given) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Impugned order of 13th February, 2018 (Annexure P-1) rejects petitioners appeal against order of 28th April, 2017 (Annexure P-2) vide which petitioner, a PGT (Commerce) has been removed from service. Vide Memorandum of 6th April, 2017 petitioner was called upon to explain his acts and misconduct and non-performance of assigned duties as a post graduate teacher and petitioner vide his undated reply (Annexure P-3) had called upon the respondent - school to state the reason and intention of threatening, misbehaving and harassing petitioner by not holding the Departmental Promot...
M/S Humboldt Wedag India Private Limited vs.cit, Circle-3, Kolkata
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA2422018 Date of decision:26. 02.2018 M/S HUMBOLDT WEDAG INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED. Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Shikhar ..... Appellant versus Garg and Mr. Upkar Agrawal, Advs. CIT, CIRCLE- 3, KOLKATA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % 1. Admit.2. The following question of law arises for consideration: Did the ITAT fall into error in upholding the revisional order made by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act in the circumstances of the case.?. 3. The assessee for the AY200708 was issued with notice by the CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on 6.12.2012. The order stated that the sum of `1973.59 lacs, reflected for the year as provisional for warranty/promise obligation was added by the AO without enquiry as to whether such de...
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs.union of India and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.732/2017 Reserved on :26. h October, 2017 Date of decision:26. h February, 2018 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Ms.Rubal Maini, Mr.Nitesh Shrivastava, Mr. Naman Joshi, Mr. Hemant Jain & Mr.Sunil Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC & Mr.T.P. Singh, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as, the petitioner) has filed the present writ petition for setting aside and quashing the order dated 8th June, 2015 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, ITA Division, Central Board of Direct Taxes, W.P. (C) N...
Madan Mohan Banga vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~8 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 408/2018 & CM No.1751/2018 MADAN MOHAN BANGA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Jawahar Raja, ASC, GNCTD for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) By virtue of this writ petition, challenge is laid to the order dated 1. 27.12.2017 This order, though adverts to the fact that the proceedings were adjourned to 10.1.2018.2. On the last date of hearing, I had asked learned counsel for the petitioner to place on record the proceedings of 10.1.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that no order was passed on 10.1.2018. 2.1 It is submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that though the matter was fixed on 10.1.2018, the order, was passed by the concerned Tribunal on 12.1.2018. Copy of this order has been placed on record.3. A perusal of order dated 12.1.2018 ...
State Nct of Delhi vs.rajeev Yadav @ Raju
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h February, 2018 CRL.L.P. 68/2017 STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with SI Dinesh PS Aman Vihar. versus RAJEEV YADAV @ RAJU ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 1969/2017 For the reasons stated in the application delay of 238 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 68/2017 1. State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 30th January, 2016 acquitting the respondent for offences punishable under Sections 354A/509/3IPC and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (in short POCSO Act).2. FIR No.1021/2014 was registered at PS Aman Vihar on the written complaint of the prosecutrix who stated that she was a student of 9th standard and she along with her friends was returning home after taking tuition when t...
Abhey Kumar Jain vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:26. h February, 2018 W.P.(C) 1683/2015, CM No.3031/2015 ABHEY KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Adv. with Ms. Renuka Arora & Ms. Nikita Salwan, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Ashok Kashyap, Adv. for SDMC ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of (a) certiorari quashing the circular dated 11.02.2015; (b) Any other or relief as this Honble Court deems fit and proper may be passed in the facts and circumstances of the present case. W.P.(C) No.1683/2015 Page 1 of 8 2. It is the case of the petitioner that it was awarded the work of improvement and strengthening of internal roads by dense carpeting by the respondent...
Santosh Upadhayay vs.amarjeet
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.206/2018 + % SANTOSH UPADHAYAY26h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anis Mohammad, Advocate. versus AMARJEET CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.7503/2018 (condonation of delay in filing) & CM No.7504/2018 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delays in filing and re- filing are condoned. CMs stand disposed. RFA No.206/2018 & CM No.7502/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 16.8.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the application filed by the appellant/defendant seeking leave to defend in an Order XXXVII suit. RFA No.206/2018 Page 1 of 8 2. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the subject suit for recovery of the loan amount of Rs...
Dr Ramjee Singh vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, Departmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1203/2018 & CM Nos.5025-26/2018 DR RAMJEE SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rudreshwar Singh, Mr.Saurabh Jain, MR.Sumeet Kr. Singh & Mr.Abhimanyu Kapoor, Advs. versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Satya Prakash Singh, Advs. for UOI. Mr.Kundan K. Mishra & Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, who was elected as a Member of the Central Council of Homeopathy pursuant to the results of the elections of the Council declared on 17.08.2017, has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 15.01.2018 vide which the respondent No.1 has based on an inquiry, declared the election to the ...
Dr Bharat Kumar Singh vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, Dep ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1205/2018 & CM Nos.5029-30/2018 DR BHARAT KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rudreshwar Singh, Mr.Saurabh Jain, MR.Sumeet Kr. Singh & Mr.Abhimanyu Kapoor, Advs. versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Satya Prakash Singh, Advs. for UOI. Mr.Kundan K. Mishra & Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, who was elected as a Member of the Central Council of Homeopathy pursuant to the results of the elections of the Council declared on 17.08.2017, has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 15.01.2018 vide which the respondent No.1 has based on an inquiry, declared the election t...
Nand Lal Bhatia & Ors. Vs.registrar of Companies & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:26. 02.2018 + W.P. (C) 1783/2018, CM APPL. 7385-7386/2018 NAND LAL BHATIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ketan Madan with Mr. Himanshu Harbola, Advocates. % versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Advocates CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.7386/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exemptions. W.P. (C) 1783/2018, CM APPL.7385/2018 (stay) 2. Issue notice. Mr. Rajesh Kumar accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.3. Counsel for the petitioners relies upon the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017, titled: Sandeep Singh and Anr. v. Registrar of Companies and Ors. Learned counsel says that the W.P.(C)1783/2018 Page 1 of 4 issue which arises for consideration in the present petition is similar to the issue which arises in Sandeep Singh ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »