Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Dhingra vs.national Scheduled Castes Finance & Development Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:21. t December, 2018 LPA1102017 Through: Appellant in person. RAKESH DHINGRA NATIONAL SCHEDULED CASTES FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ORS versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagat Singh and Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 19th December 2016 passed in W.P.(C) No.2177/1996 whereby the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has upheld the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority removing the Appellant from the service of the Respondent.2. The present case has a long history starting from the year 1994. National Scheduled Castes Finance And Development Corporation (NSFDC), the erstwhile employer of the Appellant (the Respondent no.1 herein) imposed penalty of removal from service...
Shahrukh Ali vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 3040/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2018 SHAHRUKH ALI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA M. Amit Nahata, Advocate. : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Sushil, Crime Branch. JUDGMENT2112.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks modification of the interim bail order, granted by the Trial Court by order dated 17.12.2018.2. The petitioner, by the interim order dated 17.12.2018, was granted interim bail by the Trial Court for joining the marriage ceremonies of his sister. However, the Trial Court had granted interim bail only for a period of 3 days.3. The petitioner, in this petition, has mentioned that the functions BAIL APPLN.3040/2018 Page 1 of 2 for the marriage starts from 01.01.2019 and go on till 06.01.2019 in Delhi and ther...
Asmat Ara & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order:21. December, 2017 W.P.(C) 11512/2017 ASMAT ARA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Bharat Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Minal Singh, Advocate for Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) GNCTD for R-1 to R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER CM No.46932/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.11512/2017 & CM No.46931/2017 1.... Petitioners seek regularization of their service as TGT/PGT while claiming to have worked in the said position for more than three decades. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek regularization, petitioners had made a representation (Annexure P-3 Colly) on 11th August, 2017 to respondent No.4 but to no avail.2. Despite service of advance notice, none appears for the contesting respondent i.e. respondent No.4. W.P.(C) No.11512/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition and...
Pipavav Energy Pvt Ltd vs.madhavi Procon Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 258/2016 PIPAVAV ENERGY PVT LTD + Reserved on:17. 09.2018 Date of Decision :21. 12.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shamik Sanjanwala and Mr. Sunil Kumar Kaundal, Advocates. versus MADHAVI PROCON PVT LTD Through: Mr.A.K.Verma, ..... Respondent Sr.Adv. with Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr.Ashish Joshi, Mr.Akashdeep, Advs. O.M.P. (COMM) 47/2017 & IAs 1614, 1616/2017 MADHAVI PROCON PVT LTD Through: Mr.A.K.Verma, ........ Petitioner Sr.Adv. with Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr.Ashish Joshi, Mr.Akashdeep, Advs. versus PIPAVAV ENERGY PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shamik Sanjanwala and Mr. Sunil Kumar Kaundal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions have been filed by the parties to the arbitration proceedings challenging the Arbitral Award dated 10.01.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Letter of Award dated 03.05.2010 placed by Pipavav Energy...
Rohit Rana and Ors vs.gnct of Delhi Through Its Chief Secretary and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~5 to 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5647/2016 RAM DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Mr.Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6290/2016 & CM APPL.25777/2016 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Ms.Nazia Parveen for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6292/2016 & CM APPL.25781/2016 SURENDER SINGH RANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, versus Advocates. W.P.(C) 5647/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Ms.N...
Bhai Manjit Singh (Huf) vs.bhai Manjit Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~J- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 + CS(OS) 3994/2014 BHAI MANJIT SINGH (HUF)..Plaintiff Through Mr.Ashwini Mata, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Suresh Dobhal and Mr.Yugank Goel, Advs Versus BHAI MANJIT SINGH & ANR. Defendant Through Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Mishra, Ms.Piyusha Singh,Mr.Sarthak Katyal, Mr.Jaideep Singh and Mr.Kartik Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.5018/2015 1. This application is filed under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking dismissal of the present suit in view of the existing arbitration clause.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a decree of declaration and permanent injunction. A decree of declaration is sought against defendants No.1 and 2 declaring that the Agreement to Sell dated 29.12.2010 in relation to the suit property is not binding on the plaintiff HUF. A decree CS(OS) 3994/2014 Page 1 of 17 of declaration is also sought that defen...
j.h. Jewellers vs.umed Chindaliya and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM.) 180/2017 16.11.2018 Reserved on: Date of decision:21. 12.2018 IN THE MATTER OF: J.H. JEWELLERS Through: Mr. Manav Gupta and Ms. Esha Dutta, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff UMED CHINDALIYA AND ORS versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Jagriti Ahuja and Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocates for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.REVIEW PET. 253/2017 (by D-4 u/S114r/w O XLVII CPC) and I.A. 7373/2017 (for condonation of delay of 578 days in filing REVIEW PET. 253/2017) 1. The present review petition has been filed by the defendant No.4/Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (in short, Kotak Bank) under Section 114 read with Order XLVII and Section 151 CPC for seeking review of the order dated 23.09.2015, whereunder the condonation of delay application accompanying the Chamber Appeal (O.A. No.371/2015) filed by its predecessor bank, ING Vyasa Bank Ltd. (in short, ING CS(COMM.) 180/2017 Page 1 of 20 Vyasa...
Masood Mohamad Aman @ Masood vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6591/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50553/2018 MASOOD MOHAMAD AMAN @ MASOOD STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Atul Bhandu, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Mr. Pranav Bharti, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.548/2015, registered at police station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi for offence under Section 135 Electricity Act is sought in this petition on the basis of order of 27th February, 2015 of permanent Lok Adalat.2.... Petitioners counsel submits that respondent No.3 is proforma party.3. Upon notice, counsel for respondent No.2 submits that there is no objection to quashing of FIR in question. Crl.M.C. 6591/2018 Page 1 of 2 4. In view of order of 27th February, 2015 of permanent Lok Adalat, this Court finds that continuation of proceedings arising out of F...
Jaswant Singh vs.addl. Director (Hq) Central Govt. Health Scheme & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~15 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 12.2018 + W.P.(C.) No.13932/2018 JASWANT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus ADDL. DIRECTOR (HQ) CENTRAL GOVT. HEALTH SCHEME & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) Feeling aggrieved of the order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the Central 1. 'CAT', Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi whereby, an application being OA No.1942/2018 made by the petitioner seeking compassionate appointment, was dismissed, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition. in short, 2. Concisely, the relevant facts are that the father of the petitioner was employed with the respondents and died during service on 27.08.2006. According to the petitioner, he made an application seeking compassionate W.P.(C.) No.13932/2018 Page 1 of 6 appointment as a driver on 27.08.2007 and in the abse...
Surender Singh Rana & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi Through Its Ch ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~5 to 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5647/2016 RAM DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Mr.Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6290/2016 & CM APPL.25777/2016 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Ms.Nazia Parveen for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6292/2016 & CM APPL.25781/2016 SURENDER SINGH RANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, versus Advocates. W.P.(C) 5647/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Ms.N...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »