Skip to content

Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 21 2018

Ge Pacific Pvt. Ltd. Vs.cit (International Taxation), Delhi-I

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* + + + + ITA6272017 & connected matters (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 & ITA6852017 Versus ...... Appellant GE GENBACHER GMBH & CO. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6442017; ITA6522017, C.M. APPL.29312/2017; ITA6532017; ITA6662017 & ITA8372017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX Versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD....... Appellant COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6452017; ITA6542017; ITA6572017; ITA6682017; ITA6842017 & ITA6882017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX GE PACKAGED POWER INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus INCOME TAX ...... App...


Dec 21 2018

Ge Engine Services Distribution Llc vs.commissioner of Income Tax (Int ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ...... Appellant ITA6592017 GE ENGINE SERVICES DISTRIBUTION LLC COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I INCOME TAX Versus (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly and Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Advocates, for appellant. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel, for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appeal is dismissed but without orders as to costs.2. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 21.12.2018 in ITA6212017 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) A.K. CHAWLA (JUDGE) DECEMBER21 2018 ITA6272017 & connected matters Page 1 of 1...


Dec 21 2018

The Associated Journals Ltd and Anr. Vs.land and Development Office

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 22, 2018 Pronounced on: December 21, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12133/2018 & CM471312018 1. THE ASSOCIATED JOURNALS LTD AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dev Datt Kamat, Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Priyansha Indra Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Mr. Javedur Rahman, Ms. Madhavi Khanna and Mr. Aditya Bhatt, Advocates Versus LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General with Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Dr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Associated Journals Limited was incorporated on 20th November, 1937 and in the year 2002, its Chairman-cum-Managing Director was Mr. Motilal Vora, who was also the Treasurer of All India Congress Committee (for short AICC). AJL was an unlisted public company, which was having 1057 shareholders as of 2010. Way back in the year 1962-63, land measuring 0.3365 acres was allotted to pet...


Dec 21 2018

Deepak @ Dilip vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 3001/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2018 DEEPAK @ DILIP versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vijay K. Sehgal, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms.Meenakashi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Seema Yadav SI Ravinder, PS Alipur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2112.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.194/2018 under Sections 376 of Indian Penal Code and Section 67A of Information Technology Act and Section 6, 15 & 21 of POCSO Act, Police Station Inder Puri.... Petitioner is charged only under section 67A Information Technology Act.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner had BAIL APPLN. 3001/2018 Page 1 of 3 witnessed the sexual assault by main accused in the subject FIR, recorded the incident on his cell phone and caught hold of the main accuse...


Dec 21 2018

M/S Shree Seco Pvt Ltd vs.m/s s.a Traders Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 245/2014 & EA(OS) 1160/2015, 108/2016, 21/2017 Reserved on:09. 10.2018 Date of decision : . 21.12.2018 M/S SHREE SECO PVT LTD ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.Anil Kumar Gupta & Ms.Pushti Gupta, Advs. versus M/S S.A TRADERS PVT LTD ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Biji Rajesh, Ms.Eshita Baruah, Ms.Pooja Singh, Ms.Akanshsha Choudhary & Mr.Sathak Katyal, Advs. Mr.Saud Ahmed, Adv. for the Objector. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present Execution Petition seeks enforcement of the Arbitral Award dated 29.05.2009 passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent.2. It is asserted that the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent challenging the Award was dismissed by the District Judge, Jaipur vide order dated 08.02.2011. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an Execution EX.P.245/2014 Page 1 Petition being Ex. No.1191/2011 before Dist...


Dec 21 2018

Poonnamma Vishwanathan vs.m/s Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital & Ayurve ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:21. t December, 2018 POONNAMMA VISHWANATHAN ........ Petitioner LPA2642016 Through: Dr. Jose P. Verghese, Advocate with versus Mr. K. Gireesh Kumar, Advocate. M/S MOOLCHAND KHAIRATI RAM HOSPITAL & AYURVEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.Y. Khan, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present appeal under clause X of the Letters Patents Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21st December 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge deciding- W.P.(C) 13752/2009 filed by the employee Poonnamma Vishwanathan (Appellant herein) and W.P.(C) 2957/2010 filed by the Management- Respondent.2. By way of the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge has inter- alia remanded Managements application under Section 33(2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'ID Act'), bearing OP No.71/2005 (seeking a...


Dec 21 2018

Attar Singh vs.gnct of Delhi Through Its Cheif Secretary and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

$~5 to 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5647/2016 RAM DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Mr.Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6290/2016 & CM APPL.25777/2016 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Ms.Nazia Parveen for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6292/2016 & CM APPL.25781/2016 SURENDER SINGH RANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, versus Advocates. W.P.(C) 5647/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Ms.N...


Dec 21 2018

Thankamma Joy & Ors. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6586/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50543/2018 THANKAMMA JOY & ORS. Through: Ms. Nishata Chawla, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Satender Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.399/2016, under Section 5 & 7 of The Haryana Eessential Services Maintenance Act, 1974, registered at police station I.P.Estate, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Circular of 14th November, 2017 (Annexure P-7).2. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State, accepts notice and submits that in view of Circular of 14th November, 2017 (Annexure P-7), the proceedings arising out of FIR in question ought not to continue.3. In view of aforesaid Circular, FIR No.399/2016, under Section 5 & 7 of The Haryana Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1974...


Dec 21 2018

Smt. Ritu Gupta vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2018 CRL.REV.P. 1120/2018 SMT. RITU GUPTA versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Samar Bansal and Ms. Vidhi Goel, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Bharat Mr. S.P. Singh, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2112.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 49485/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.A. 49484/2018 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 1120/2018 & Crl.M.A.50737/2018 CRL.REV.P11202018 Page 1 of 3 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 12.01.2018 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner impugning judgment/order on conviction dated 20.01.2017 and order on sentence dated 30.01.2017 has been dismissed....


Dec 21 2018

M/S Nimbus Automotive Pvt. Ltd. Vs.state Bank of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5067/2018 & CM Nos. 19561-19562/2018, 35611/2018, 43353/2018 M/S NIMBUS AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr T. Roy, Advocate with Mr the Vijay Kapoor, AR of petitioner. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Nikita Salwan, Advocate for R-3/DSIIDC. Mr S. L. Gupta with Mr Mithilesh Pal, Advocates for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2112.2018 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. impugning a communication dated 28.12.2017 issued by the respondent bank (State Bank of India - hereafter SBI) rejecting the petitioners consent for One time Settlement (OTS) as conveyed by a letter dated 24.11.2017. The petitioner that an appropriate directions be given to SBI to give effect to the SBI Scheme for One Time Settlement of NPAs and AUCAs in Manufacturing, Trade, Services & Agriculture Sector (hereafter SBI OTS2017). further prays ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial