Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
All India Idbi Officers Association vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:21. t December, 2018 LPA7322018, Cav. 1209/2018 & CM Nos. 54238-54240/2018 ALL INDIA IDBI OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pranav Sachdeva and Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG, Ms. Maninder ........ RESPONDENTS Acharya, ASG, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Barua, Mr. Sahil Sood, Mr. Harshul Choudhary & Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Sanyam Saxena, Adv. with Mr. Sahil Khanna and Mr. J.D. Baruah, Advs. for R3 Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dipak K. Nag and Mr. Apurva Upmanyau, Advs. for R-6 Mr. H.S. Parihar and Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Advs. for RBI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CAV. 1209/2018 Learned counsel for the caveator has put in appearance. Caveat stands discharged. LPA7322018 Page 1 of 17 CM Nos. 54239-54240/2018 Exemptio...
Ge Japan Ltd. Vs.cit (International Taxation), Delhi-I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + + + + ITA6272017 & connected matters (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 & ITA6852017 Versus ...... Appellant GE GENBACHER GMBH & CO. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6442017; ITA6522017, C.M. APPL.29312/2017; ITA6532017; ITA6662017 & ITA8372017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX Versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD....... Appellant COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6452017; ITA6542017; ITA6572017; ITA6682017; ITA6842017 & ITA6882017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX GE PACKAGED POWER INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus INCOME TAX ...... App...
Ge Multilin vs.cit (International Taxation), Delhi-I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + + + + ITA6272017 & connected matters (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 & ITA6852017 Versus ...... Appellant GE GENBACHER GMBH & CO. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6442017; ITA6522017, C.M. APPL.29312/2017; ITA6532017; ITA6662017 & ITA8372017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX Versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD....... Appellant COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6452017; ITA6542017; ITA6572017; ITA6682017; ITA6842017 & ITA6882017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX GE PACKAGED POWER INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus INCOME TAX ...... App...
Ashish Kapoor vs.barkha Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:21. 12.2018 Cont. Cas. (C) No.966/2018 ASHISH KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana & Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates. BARKHA KAPOOR Versus ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.54379/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. Cont. Cas. (C) No.966/2018 1. By this petition under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent/contemnor for deliberately resiling from the settlement dated 10.11.2017 and for violating the order dated 08.01.2018 passed by the court of the learned Judge, Family Court, Shahdara District, Delhi in HMA No.255/2017 and punish her in accordance with law.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized, as per Hindu rites Cont. Cas. (C) No.9...
Sh. Manoj Jain and Ors. Vs.air India Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order:21. December, 2017 W.P.(C) 11495/2017 SH. MANOJ JAIN AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sanjeev Singh, Advocate and Ms.Anandita Singh, Advocate versus AIR INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Ratna Dhingra, Ms.Bhavna Dhami and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates for R-1 to R-4 Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC and Ms.Manisha Saroha, Advocate for R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER CM No.46863/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.11495/2017 1. The grievance of petitioners in this case is that they have not been considered for promotion to the post of Senior Managers. While asserting that not only juniors but even two ineligible candidates were promoted, it is submitted that this grievance was brought to the notice of W.P.(C) No.11495/2017 Page 1 of 2 first respondent by way of a representation (Annexure P-5 Colly) on 20th November, 2017 and even prior thereto, a representation (A...
Nafe Singh vs.sanjay Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NAFE SINGH RFA No.1036/2018 21st December, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advocate (M. No.9810134793). SANJAY GUPTA versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos. 54260/2018 (for condonation of delay in filing) & 54261/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 1 day in filing and 18 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.1036/2018 Page 1 of 7 RFA No.1036/2018 and C.M. No.54259/2018(stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 26.07.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of earnest money of Rs. 90,00,000/- paid ...
Sanjeev Kumar Bhardwaj vs.sanjay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. t December, 2018 + MAC.APP. 711/2017, CM APPL. 32446/2018 & CM APPL. 38908/2018 SANJEEV KUMAR BHARDWAJ ...Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Mr. Dishank Dhawan and Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocates. versus SANJAY KUMAR ... Respondent Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma and Mr. Bharvi Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the impugned award in DAR No.145dated 13.04.2017 passed by the Additional District Judge (NE) Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Pilot Court), Karkardooma Court, Delhi whereby the compensation of Rs.99,317/- alongwith interest at the rate of 9% p.a. on the total compensation amount from the date of filing of petition till realization has been awarded in favor MAC.APP. 711/2017, CM APPL. 32446/2018 & CM APPL. 38908/2018 Page 1 of 6 of Respondent/Complainant.2. The facts alleged are that on 10.03.2013 at about 12 PM injure...
Om Prakash & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi Through Its Chief Secre ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~5 to 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5647/2016 RAM DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Mr.Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6290/2016 & CM APPL.25777/2016 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Ms.Nazia Parveen for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6292/2016 & CM APPL.25781/2016 SURENDER SINGH RANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, versus Advocates. W.P.(C) 5647/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Ms.N...
Dheeraj & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6605/2018 & Crl.M.A.50616/2018 DHEERAJ & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta and Mr. B.Singh, Versus Advocates STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents CORAM: Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Deepak Bhardwaj Mr. N.L. Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.135/2012, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC registered at police station Adarsh Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 30th August, 2018 (Annexure-4).2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the father of complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Deepak Bhardwaj as well as by his counsel.3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that Sapna, who is the complainant...
Sabir & Ors vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 Crl.M.C. 6566/2018 & CRL.M.A. 50495/2018 SABIR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates Versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor, with ASI Ram Lal... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.23/2015, under Sections 323/341/3of IPC. registered at police station Malviya Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding dated 10th October, 2018 (Annexure- B).2. Upon notice, Mr. M.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondents No.2 & 3 are the complainant party of FIR in question and they are present in the Court and have been identified to be so, by ASI Ram Lal on the basis of identity proof furnished by them. Crl.M.C. 6566/2018 Page 1 of 3 3.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 submit that the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »